Comparison of paper and computer-based questionnaire modes for measuring health outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 285-293

  Shervin, Nina ^a   Dorrwachter, Janet ^a   Bragdon, Charles R ^a   Shervin, David ^a   Zurakowski, David ^a   Malchau, Henrik ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INPUT DEVICE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; EUROQOL 5D; FEMALE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES ACTIVITY SCORE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

EID: 79551514001     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01104     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Liang MH, Katz JN, Phillips C, Sledge C, Cats-Baril W. The total hip arthroplasty outcome evaluation form of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Results of a nominal group process. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Task Force on Outcome Studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:639-46.
2. Bellamy N, Campbell J. Hip and knee rating scales for total joint arthroplasty: a critical but constructive review; part I. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1989;2:3-21.
3. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:517-26.
4. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-55.
5. Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:189-97.
6. Rubash HE, Harris WH. Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modern cementing techniques. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:241-8.
7. Mahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, Harris WH. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:575-80.
8. Ritter MA, Fechtman RW, Keating EM, Faris PM. The use of a hip score for evaluation of the results of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:187-9.
9. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Correlation of patient questionnaire responses and physician history in grading clinical outcome following hip and knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of 201 joint arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:47-57.
10. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:81-8. (Pubitemid 126510382)
11. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):S217-32.
12. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:958-65.
13. Saleh KJ, Radosevich DM, Kassim RA, Moussa M, Dykes D, Bottolfson H, Gioe TJ, Robinson H. Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:1146-51.
14. Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, Dammann KL, Dale Ø, Aanerud GJ, Alme TN, Uhlig T. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1480-4.
15. Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, Hjollund NH. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9:e25.
16. Fouladi RT, McCarthy CJ, Moller NP. Paper-and-pencil or online? Evaluating mode effects on measures of emotional functioning and attachment. Assessment. 2002;9:204-15.
17. Steenhuis MP, Serra M, Minderaa RB, Hartman CA. An Internet version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV): correspondence of the ADHD section with the paper-and-pencil version. Psychol Assess. 2009;21:231-4.
18. Shapiro S, Wilk MD. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika. 1965;52:591-611.
19. Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2005. p 49-51.