An Internet Version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV): Correspondence of the ADHD Section With the Paper-and-Pencil Version

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 231-234

  Steenhuis, Mark Peter ^a   Serra, Marike ^a   Minderaa, Rudolf Boudewijn ^a   Hartman, Catharina Annette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ADHD; childhood psychiatric problems; Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC IV); Internet based data collection; reliability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHIATRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW SCHEDULE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOL CHILD;

ADULT; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; CHILD; DATA COLLECTION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PARENTS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 66549100705     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0015925     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American National Standards Institute. X3H2 Records (CBI 168) [database management system] (2003). http://special.lib.umn.edu/findaid/xml/cbi00168.xml Charles Babbage Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from http://special.lib.umn.edu/findaid/xml/cbi00168.xml
2. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measures 46 (1960) 20-37
3. Ferdinand R.F., and van der Ende J. Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children IV: Parent Version (1998), Erasmus University, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
4. Fisher P. Scoring manual: Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV) (2000), Columbia University-New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
5. Gosling S.D., Vazire S., Srivastava S., and John O.P. Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist 59 (2004) 93-104
6. Hauan M.J. JADE: Computerization of a structured interview for childhood psychiatric diagnosis. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium (1999) 276-280
7. Hayes M.A., McReynolds L.S., and Wasserman G.A. Paper and voice MAYSI-2: Format comparability and concordance with the voice DISC-IV. Assessment 12 (2005) 395-403
8. Ho T.P., Leung P.W., Lee C.C., Tang C.P., Hung S.F., Kwong S.L., et al. Test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Version 4 (DISC-IV). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46 (2005) 1135-1138
9. Internetworldstats. European Union Internet usage and population stats (2009). http://www.Internetworldstats.com/europa.htm#nl Retrieved February, 11, 2009, from http://www.Internetworldstats.com/europa.htm#nl
10. Jensen P., Roper M., Fisher P., Piacentini J., Canino G., Richters J., et al. Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1): Parent, child, and combined algorithms. Archives of General Psychiatry 52 (1995) 61-71
11. Ko S.J., Wasserman G.A., McReynolds L.S., and Katz L.M. Contribution of parent report to voice DISC-IV diagnosis among incarcerated youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 43 (2004) 868-877
12. Lucas C.P. The use of structured diagnostic interviews in clinical child psychiatric practice. In: First M. (Ed). Structured evaluation in clinical practice 22 (2003), American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC 75-102 Review of Psychiatry
13. Lucas C.P., Fisher P., Piacentini J., Zhang H., Jensen P.S., Shaffer D., et al. Features of interview questions associated with attenuation of symptom reports. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 27 (1999) 429-437
14. Lucia S., Herrmann L., and Killias M. How important are interview methods and questionnaire designs in research on self-reported juvenile delinquency? An experimental comparison of Internet vs paper-and-pencil questionnaires and different definitions of the reference period. Journal of Experimental Criminology 3 (2007) 39-64
15. Peters L., and Andrews G. Procedural validity of the computerized version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) in the anxiety disorders. Psychological Medicine 25 (1995) 1269-1280
16. Peters L., Clark D., and Carroll F. Are computerized interviews equivalent to human interviewers? CIDI-Auto versus CIDI in anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychological Medicine 28 (1998) 893-901
17. PHP Group. PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor [server side scripting] (2001-2009). http://www.php.net Retrieved January 2, 2009, from http://www.php.net
18. Shaffer D., Fisher P., Lucas C.P., Dulcan M.K., and Schwab-Stone M.E. NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): Description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39 (2000) 28-38
19. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 2 (1979) 420-428
20. Wasserman G.A., McReynolds L.S., Lucas C.P., Fisher P., and Santos L. The voice DISC-IV with incarcerated male youths: Prevalence of disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 41 (2002) 314-321
21. West P., Sweeting H., Der G., Barton J., and Lucas C. Voice-DISC identified DSM-IV disorders among 15-year-olds in the west of Scotland. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 42 (2003) 941-949
22. White T.M., and Hauan M.J. Using client-side event logging and path tracing to assess and improve the quality of web-based surveys. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium (2002) 894-898
23. World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 2.1 (2007). http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/index.html Retrieved January 10, 2007, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/index.html