Social conflict over property rights: The end, a new beginning, or a continuing debate?

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 329-349

  Jacobs, Harvey M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use; Legislation; Policy; Property

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551513877     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: 2152050X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511481003788760     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abbott, Carl, Sy Adler, and Deborah Howe. 2003. "A quiet counterrevolution in land use regulation: The origins and impacts of Oregon's measure 7." Housing Policy Debate 14, no. 3: 383-425.
2. Adams, John. 1851(1790). "Discourses on Davilia, A series of papers on political history." In The works of John Adams, Vol. 6, ed. Charles Francis Adams. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
3. Bosselman, Fred P., and David Callies. 1971. The quiet revolution in land use control. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O.
4. Bosselman, Fred, David Callies, and John Banta. 1973. The taking issue: An analysis of the constitutional limits of land use control. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
5. Brands, H.W. 2000. The first American: The life and times of Benjamin Franklin. New York: Anchor Books.
6. Brick, Philip D., and McGreggor R. Cawley, eds. 1996. A wolf in the garden: The land rights movement and the new environmental debate. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
7. Budd-Falen, Karen. 1996. "Protecting community stability and local economies: Opportunities for local government influence in federal decision- and policy-making processes." In A wolf in the garden: The land rights movement and the new environmental debate, eds. P.D. Brick, and McGreggor R. Cawley, 73-85. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
8. Callies, David L., ed. 1993. After lucas: Land use regulation and the taking of property without compensation. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
9. Castle Coalition. 2007. 50 State report card: Tracking eminent domain reform legislation since Kelo. Arlington, VA: Castle Coalition.
10. Cerundolo, Pat A. 1998. "The limited impact of Lucas V. South Carolina Coastal council on Massachusetts Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 25, no. 2: 431-83.
11. Cronon, William. 1983. Changes in the land: Indians, colonists and the ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.
12. Daniels, Tom, and Deborah Bowers. 1997. Holding our ground: Protecting America's farms and farmland. Covelo, CA: Island Press.
13. Deal, Carl. 1993. The greenpeace guide to anti-environmental organizations. Berkeley, CA: Odonian Press.
14. Echeverria, John D., and Thekla Hansen-Young. 2008. The track record on takings legislation: Lessons from democracy's laboratories.Washington, DC: Georgetown Environmental Law and Policy Institute, Georgetown University Law Center.
15. Egan, Timothy. 2005. "Ruling sets off Tug of war over private property." The New York Times, July 30 (national edition): A1, A10.
16. Ely, James W., Jr. 1992. The guardian of every other right: A constitutional history of property rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Emerson, Kirk, and Charles R. Wise. 1997. Statutory approaches to regulatory takings: State property rights legislation issues and implications for public administration." Public Administration Review 57, no. 5: 411-22.
18. Folsom, Robin E. 1993. "Executive order 12,630: A president's manipulation of the fifth amendment's just compensation clause to achieve control over executive agency regulatory Decision making." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 20, no. 4: 639-97.
19. Franklin, Benjamin. 1907(1789). "Queries and remarks respecting alterations in the constitution of Pennsylvania." In The writings of Benjamin Franklin, Vol. 10, ed. Albert H. Smith, London: Macmillan.
20. Gates, Paul W. 1968. History of public land law development. (Written for the Public Land Law Review Commission). Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O.
21. Gottlieb, Alan M., ed. 1989. The wise use agenda. Bellevue, WA: The Free Enterprise Press.
22. Greenhouse, Linda. 2002. "Justices weaken movement backing property rights." The New York Times. April 24 (national edition): A1, Ax.
23. Greenhouse, Linda. 2005. "Justices uphold taking property for development." The New York Times, June 24 (national edition): A1, Ax.
24. Haberman, Clyde. 2007. "So many presidential debates, so little concern shown for cities." The New York Times, December 14 (New York edition).
25. Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 1961. The federalist papers. New York: Mentor Books. (Original work published 1788).
26. Harden, Blaine 2005. "Anti-sprawl laws, property rights collide in Oregon." The Washington Post, February 28: A1, A7.
27. Huffman, James L. 2008. "Background principles and the rule of law: Fifteen years after Lucas." Ecology Law Quarterly 35, no. 1: 1-28.
28. Hungerford, Andrea. 1995. "'Custom and culture'ordinances: Not a wise move for the wise use movement." Tulane Environmental Law Journal 8, no. 2: 457-503.
29. Jacobs, Hannah. 2007. "Searching for balance in the aftermath of the 2006 takings initiatives." Yale Law Journal 116, no. 7: 1518-66.
30. Jacobs, Harvey M. 1995. "The anti-environmental, 'wise use' movement in America." Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 47, no. 2: 3-8.
31. Jacobs, Harvey M. 1998a. "The impact of state property rights laws: Those laws and my land." Land Use Law and Zoning Digest 50, no. 3: 3-8.
32. Jacobs, Harvey M. 1998b. "The 'wisdom,' but uncertain future, of the wise use movement." In Who owns America? Social conflict over property rights, ed. H.M. Jacobs, 29-44. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
33. Jacobs, Harvey M. 1999a. "Fighting over land: America's legacy America's future?". Journal of the American Planning Association 65, no. 2: 141-9.
34. Jacobs, Harvey M. 1999b. State property rights laws: The impacts of those laws on my land, Policy focus report. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
35. Jacobs, Harvey M. 2003. "The politics of property rights at the national level: Signals and trends." Journal of the American Planning Association 69, no. 2: 181-9.
36. Jacobs, Harvey M. 2007. "New actions or new arguments over regulatory takings?". Yale Law Journal Pocket Part 117: 65-70. http://yalelawjournal.org/2007/09/16/jacobs.html.
37. Jacobs, Harvey M., and Ellen M. Bassett. 2010a. "After 'Kelo': Political rhetoric and policy responses." Land Lines 22, no. 2: 14-20.
38. Jacobs, Harvey M., and Ellen M. Bassett. 2010b. All sound, no fury? Assessing the impacts of state-based Kelo laws on planning practice. Working paper. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
39. th century American planning." Journal of the American Planning Association 75, no. 2: 135-43.
40. Kayden, Jerold S. 2002. "Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency: About more than Moratoria." Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 54, no. 10: 3-5.
41. Kayden, Jerold S. 2004. "Charting the constitutional course of private property: Learning from the 20th century." In Private property in the 21st century, ed. H.M. Jacobs, 31-49. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
42. Kolnick, Kathy. 2008. Order before zoning: Land use regulation in Los Angeles, 1880-1915. Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
43. Locke, John. 1952(1690). The second treatise of government, ed. T.P. Peardon. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Educational.
44. Marzulla, Nancie G. 1996. "Property rights movement: How it began and where it is headed." In A wolf in the garden: The land rights movement and the new environmental debate, eds. P.D. Brick, and R. McGreggor Cawley, 39-58. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
45. McClaughry, John 1975. "The new feudalism." Environmental Law 5, no. 3: 675-702.
46. McClaughry, John 1976. "Farmers, freedom, and feudalism: How to avoid the coming serfdom." South Dakota Law Review 21, no. 3: 486-541.
47. Meltz, Robert, Dwight H. Merriam, and Richard M. Frank. 1999. The takings issue: Constitutional limits on land-use controls and environmental regulation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
48. Miniter, Richard 1994. "You just can't take it anymore: America's property rights Revolt." Policy Review 70: 40-6.
49. Moss, Elaine, ed. 1977. Land use controls in the United States: A handbook on the legal rights of citizens by the natural resources defense council, inc. New York: The Dail Press/James Wade.
50. Nelson, Arthur C., and Casey J. Dawkins. 2004. Urban containment in the US: History, models, and techniques for regional and metropolitan growth management. Planning Advisory Service Report 520. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
51. Oliver, Gordon. 2004. "Oregon on the cusp." Planning 70, no. 9: 4-9.
52. Ozawa, Connie, ed. 2004. The Portland edge: Challenges and successes in growing communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
53. Pollot, Mark L. 1989. "The effect of the federal takings executive order." Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 41, no. 5: 3-7.
54. Pristin, Terry 2006. "Voters back limits on eminent domain." The New York Times, November 15 (national edition): Cx.
55. Protos, Jill Dickey. 1993. "Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: A tremor on the regulatory takings richter scale." Case Western Reserve Law Review 43, no. 2: 669-97.
56. Reed, Scott W. 1996. "The county supremacy movement: Mendacious myth marketing." In A wolf in the garden: The land rights movement and the new environmental debate, eds. P.D. Brick, and R. McGreggor Cawley, 87-104. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
57. Revell, Keith D. 1999. "The road to Euclid v. Ambler: City planning, state-building, and the changing scope of the police power." Studies in American Political Development 13, no. 1: 50-145.
58. Ring, Ray 2006. "Taking liberties." High Country News, July 24. http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=16409.
59. Roddewig, Richard J., and Christopher J. Duerksen. 1989. Responding to the takings challenge: A guide for officials and planners. Planning Advisory Service Report No. 416. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
60. Rohse, Mitch. 2004. "Oregon's measure 37: Just or unjust compensation." Planning 70, no. 9: 6.
61. Salkin, Patricia E. 2001. Trends in land use law from A to Z: Adult uses to zoning. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
62. Scott, Mel. 1969. American city planning since 1890. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
63. Siegan, Bernard H. 2001. Property rights: From Magna Carta to the fourteenth amendment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
64. Sugameli, Glenn, P. 1999. "Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: The categorical and other "exceptions" to liability for fifth amendment takings of private property far outweigh the "rule." Environmental Law 29, no. 4: 939-87.
65. Teles, Steven M. 2008. The rise of the conservative legal movement: The battle for control of the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Treanor, William Michael. 1995. "The original understanding of the takings clause and the political process." Columbia Law Review 95, no. 4: 782-887.
67. Turner, Frederick Jackson. 1893. "The significance of the frontier in American history." Report of the American Historical Association: 199-227.
68. White, Stacey S. 2000. "State property rights laws: Recent impacts and future implications." Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 52, no. 7: 3-9.
69. Yandle, Bruce, ed. 1995. Land rights: The 1990's property rights rebellion. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.