The politics of property rights at the national level signals and trends

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 181-189

  Jacobs, Harvey M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LAND USE PLANNING; NATIONAL PLANNING; PROPERTY RIGHTS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038604405     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360308976305     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, C., Adler, S., and Howe, D., 2001. A quiet counterrevolution in land use regulation:The origins and impacts of Oregon's Measure 7, Portland, OR:Portland State University. Unpublished manuscript
2. Bethell, T., 1998. The noblest triumph:Property and prosperity through the ages, New York:St. Martin's Press.
3. Bumiller, E., April 13 2002. “ On a snowy day, Bush defends record ”. In New York Times April 13, A18 (national ed.)
4. Brick, P. D., and Cawley, R. M., eds. 1996. A wolf in the garden:The land rights movement and the new environmental debate, Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield.
5. DeLong, J. V., 1997. Property matters:How property rights are under assault—and why you should care, New York:The Free Press.
6. Echeverria, J. D., 2001a. A preliminary analysis of. Palazzolo v. Rhode Island. Environmental Law Reporter, 31:11112–11122.
7. Echeverria, J. D., 2001b. Reflections on Oregon Measure 7 Retrieved from http://www.envpoly.org/papers/measure7.html
8. Egan, T., May 15 2001. “ In energy plan, property rights may be an issue ”. In New York Times, national ed. May 15, A1, A 20
9. Ely, J. W., Jr. 1992. The guardian of every other right:A Constitutional history of property rights, New York:Oxford University Press.
10. Emerson, K., and Wise, C. R., 1997. Statutory approaches to regulatory takings:State property rights legislation issues and implications for public administration. Public Administration Review, 57:411–422.
11. Folsom, R. E., 1993. Executive order 12,630:A president's manipulation of the Fifth Amendment's just compensation clause to achieve control over executive agency regulatory decisionmaking. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 20:639–697.
12. Gillespie, E., and Schellhas, B., eds. 1994. Contract with America:The bold plan by Rep. Newt Gingrich, Rep. Dick Armey and the House Republicans to change the nation, New York:Times Books.
13. Glaberson, W., December 5 2001. “ A nation challenged:The government's case; support for Bush's antiterror plan ”. In New York Times, national ed. December 5, B6
14. Goldberg, C., May 25 2001. “ Jeffords, and fellow Vermonters, emphasize tradition ”. In New York Times, Jeffords, and fellow Vermonters, emphasize traditionnational ed. May 25, A19
15. Gottlieb, A. M., ed. 1989. The wise use agenda, Bellevue, WA:Free Enterprise Press.
16. Greenhouse, L., April 24 2002. “ Justices weaken movement backing property rights ”. In New York Times, national ed. April 24, A1, A18
17. Hernandez, R., April 15 2002. “ Political battle looming over superfund plan ”. In New York Times, national ed. April 15, A22
18. Jacobs, H. M., 1995. The anti-environmental, ‘wise use’ movement in America. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 47 (2):3–8.
19. Jacobs, H. M., 1996. Whose rights, whose regulations? Land theory, land policy, and the ambiguous future of the new private property rights movement in the U.S. Environmental Planning Quarterly, 13 (3):3–8.
20. Jacobs, H. M., 1997a. “ La controverse sur les droits de propriété aux Etats-Unis:Un avenir incertain (The controversy over property rights in the United States:An uncertain future) ”. In Droits de propriété et En-vironnement (Property Rights and Environment, Edited by:Falque, M., and Massenet, M., 306–317. Paris:Dalloz.
21. Jacobs, H. M., 1997b. Le culte de la propriété aux Etats-Unis (The cult of ownership in the United States). Études Foncières, 77:55–58.
22. Jacobs, H. M., 1998a. The impact of state property rights laws:Those laws and my land. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 50 (3):3–8.
23. Jacobs, H. M., 1998b. “ The “wisdom,” but uncertain future, of the wise use movement ”. In Who owns America? Social conflict over property rights, Edited by:Jacobs, H. M., 29–44. Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
24. Jacobs, H. M., ed. 1998c. Who owns America? Social conflict over property rights, Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
25. Jacobs, H. M., 1999a. Fighting over land:America's legacy … America's future?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65:141–149.
26. Jacobs, H. M., 1999b. State property rights laws:The impacts of those laws on my land, Cambridge, MA:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (Policy Focus Report)
27. Jacobs, H. M., and Ohm, B. W., 1995. Statutory takings legislation:The national context, the Wisconsin and Minnesota proposals. Wisconsin Environmental Law Journal, 2:173–223.
28. Jeffords, J., 2001. Statement of Senator James Jeffords—“Dec-laration of independence.” Retrieved from http://www.senate.gov/∼jeffords/524statement.html
29. Jehl, D., March 11 2001a. “ Moves on environment disappoint industry ”. In New York Times, national ed. March 11, A16
30. Jehl, D., March 28 2001b. “ Urging Bush to resist pressure, forest chief resigns ”. In New York Times, national ed. March 28, A15
31. Kayden, J. S., 2002. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency:About more than moratoria. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 54 (10):3–5.
32. Labaton, S., May 23 2001. “ Bush is putting team in place for a full-bore assault on regulation ”. In New York Times, national ed. May 23, C1, C4
33. Leo, J., 2001. Republicans had better rethink their anti-environmentalist stance. Wisconsin State Journal, April 3:A6
34. Lewis, N. A., February 15 2001. “ Prize job for a Bush rescuer ”. In New York Times, national ed. February 15, A20
35. Norton, G. A., April 20 2002. “ Helping citizens conserve their own land—and America's ”. In New York Times, national ed. April 20, A17
36. Ohm, B. W., 2000. Reforming land planning legislation at the dawn of the 21st century:The emerging influence of smart growth and livable communities. The Urban Lawyer, 32:181–210.
37. Palazzolo v. Rhode Island. 2001. 533 U.S. 606
38. Risen, J., January 31 2001. “ Conservative land-use groups gain in vote ”. In New York Times, national ed. January 31, A15
39. Rosenbaum, D. E., April 19 2002. “ Senate blocks drilling in Alaska wildlife refuge ”. In New York Times, national ed. April 19, A16
40. Seelye, K., October 26 2001. “ Bush White House reverses Clinton decision on mining ”. In New York Times, national ed. October 26, A12
41. Seelye, K., April 22 2002. “ President to use Earth Day to sell environmental plan ”. In New York Times, national ed. April 22, A19
42. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. 2002. 122 S. Ct. 1465
43. Toner, R., March 19 2001a. “ Conservatives savor their role as insiders at the White House ”. In New York Times, national ed. March 19, A1, A16
44. Toner, R., April 4 2001b. “ Environmental reversals leave moderate Republicans hoping for greener times ”. In New York Times, national ed. April 4, A14
45. Toner, R., November 18 2001c. “ Civil liberty vs. security:Finding a wartime balance ”. In New York Times, national ed. November 18, A1, B6
46. White, S. S., 2000. State property rights laws:Recent impacts and future implications. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 52 (7):3–9.
47. Winter, G., March 20 2002. “ U.S. acts to shrink endangered species habitats ”. In New York Times, national ed. March 20, A16
48. Yandle, B., ed. 1995. Land rights:The 1990s property rights rebellion, Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield.