Charting the constitutional course of private property: Learning from the 20th century

Private Property in the 21st Century: The Future of an American Ideal

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 31-49

  Kayden, Jerold S ^a,b  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN   (United States)

^b National Trust for Historic Preservation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896146825     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781008461.00011     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Altshuler, A.A. and Gomez-Ibanez, J.A. (1993). Regulation for Revenue: The political economy of land use exactions. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2. Brauneis, R. (1996). The foundation of our ‘regulatory takings’ jurisprudence: The myth and meaning of Justice Holmes’s Opinion in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon. Yale Law Journal, 106, 613-702.
3. Coursen, D. (1996). Property rights legislation: A survey of federal and state assessment and compensation measures. Environmental Law Reporter, 26, 10239-51.
4. Echeverria, J. and Eby, R. (eds). (1995). Let the People Judge: Wise use and the private property rights movement. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5. Echeverria, J. (2000). Is the Penn Central Three-Factor Test Ready for History’s Dustbin?. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest, 52(1), 3-8.
6. Epstein, R.A. (1985). Takings: Private property and the power of eminent domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Haar, C.M. and Wolf, M.A. (2002). Euclid lives: The survival of progressive jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review, 115, 2158-203.
8. Heller, M. (2000). Three Faces of Private Property. Oregon Law Review, 79, 417-34.
9. Jacobs, H.M. (1995). The anti-environmental, ‘wise use’ movement in America. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest, 47(2), 3-8.
10. Jacobs, H.M. (1998). The impact of state property rights laws: Those laws and my land. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest, 50(3), 3-8.
11. Kayden, J.S. (1989). Judges as planners: Limited or general partners. In C.M. Haar and J.S. Kayden (eds), Zoning and the American Dream: Promises still to keep. Chicago: Planners Press, American Planning Association in association with Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 223-51.
12. Kayden, J.S. (1996). Hunting for quarks: Constitutional takings, property rights, and government regulation. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 50, 125-39.
13. Michelman, F. (1988). Takings, 1987. Columbia Law Review, 88, 1600-29.
14. Pollak, D. (2000). Have the US Supreme Court’s 5th Amendment Takings Decisions Changed Land Use Planning in California? CRB-00-004. Sacramento, CA: California Research Bureau.
15. Reich, C. (1964). The new property. Yale Law Journal, 73, 733-48.
16. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1988). Against ad hocery: A comment on Michelman. Columbia Law Review, 88, 1697-711.