Property rights: The neglected theme of 20th-century American planning

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 134-143

  Jacobs, Harvey M ^a   Paulsen, Kurt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use; Planning history; Property rights

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; FUTURE PROSPECT; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; LAND USE PLANNING; LEGISLATION; PLANNING HISTORY; PRIVATE LAND; PROPERTY RIGHTS; TWENTIETH CENTURY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70549101047     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360802619721     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (74)

1. Abbott, C., Adler, S., & Howe, D.(2003). A quiet counterrevolution in land use regulation: The origins and impact of Oregon's Measure 7. Housing Policy Debate, 14 (3), 383-425.
2. Babcock, R. (1966). The zoning game: Municipal practices and policies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Berman v. Parke, 348 U.S. 26 (1954).
4. Bettman, A. (1926). Brief of amicus curiae on behalf of the National Conference on City Planning et al., Landmark briefs and arguments of the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional law (Vol. 24, pp. 757-824). Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America, Inc.
5. Bosselman, F., & Callies, D. (1971). The quiet revolution in land use control. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. Brick, P. D., & Cawley, R. M. (Eds.). (1996). A wolf in the garden: The land rights movement and the new environmental debate. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
7. Claeys, E. (2004). Euclid lives? The uneasy legacy of progressivism in zoning. Fordham Law Review, 73(2), 731-770.
8. Daniels, T. (2001). Smart growth: A new American approach to regional planning. Planning Practice and Research, 16(3-4), 271-279.
9. Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31 (4), 544-555.
10. Dyckman, C. (2008). The covenant conundrum in urban water conservation. The Urban Lawyer, 40(1), 17-50.
11. Ely, J. W. (1992). The guardian of every other right: A constitutional history of property rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Emerson, K., & Wise, C. (1997). Statutory approaches to regulatory takings: State property rights legislation issues and implications for public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(5), 411-422.
13. Epstein, R. A. (1985). Takings: Private property and the power of eminent domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Epstein, R. A. (2008). Supreme neglect: How to revive Constitutional protection for private property. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Euclid (Village of Euclid, Ohio) v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926).
16. Feiss, C. (1985). The foundations of federal planning assistance: A personal account of the 701 program. Journal of the American Planning Association, 51(2), 175-184.
17. Fischel, W. (2004). An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Studies, 41(2), 317-340.
18. Fischler, R. (1998). The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: Revisiting the 1916 New York City ordinance. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 170-177.
19. Fishman, R. (2000). The American planning tradition: An introduction and interpretation. In R. Fishman (Ed.), The American planning tradition: Culture and policy (pp. 1-32). Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
20. Fishman, R. (2007). Revolt of the urbs: Robert Moses and his critics. In H. Ballon & K. Jackson (Eds.), Robert Moses and the modern city: The transformation of New York (pp. 122-129). New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
21. Fogelson, R. M. (2005). Bourgeois nightmares: Suburbia, 1870-1930. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Folsom, R. E. (1993). Executive Order 12630: A president's manipulation of the Fifth Amendment's just compensation clause to achieve control over executive agency regulatory decision making. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 20(4), 639-697.
23. Goodman, R. (1971). After the planners. New York: Simon and Schuster.
24. Gottlieb, A. (1989). The wise use agenda. Bellevue, WA: The Free Enterprise Press.
25. Hall, P. (2002). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Hardin, G. (1968, December). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
27. Hayden, D. (2003). Building suburbia: Green fields and urban growth, 1820-2000. New York: Pantheon Books.
28. Heiman, M. (1988). The quiet evolution: Power, planning and profits in New York. New York: Praeger.
29. Jacobs, H. (2007). Searching for balance in the aftermath of the 2006 takings initiatives. Yale Law Journal, 116(7), 1518-1566.
30. Jacobs, H. M. (1998a). The "wisdom," but uncertain future, of the wise use movement. In H. M. Jacobs (Ed.), Who owns America? Social conflict over property rights (pp. 29-44). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
31. Jacobs, H. M. (Ed.). (1998b). Who owns America? Social conflict over property rights. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
32. Jacobs, H. M. (1999). State property rights laws: The impacts of those laws on my land, Policy Focus Report. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
33. Jacobs, H. M. (2003). The politics of property rights at the national level: Signals and trends. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 181-189.
34. Jacobs, H. M. (2008). The future of regulatory takings issues in the U.S. and Europe: Divergence or convergence? Urban Lawyer, 40(1), 51-72.
35. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities New York: Vantage Books.
36. Just v. Marinette County, 56 Wis.2d 7, 201 N.W.2d 761 (Wis.1972).
37. Kantor, H. (1994). Benjamin Marsh and the fight over congestion. In D. Krueckeberg (Ed.), The American planner: Biographies and recollections (pp. 113-132). New Brunswick, NJ: The Center for Urban Policy Research.
38. Kayden, J. (1989). Judges as planners: Limited or general partners? In C. Haar & J. Kayden (Eds.), Zoning and the American dream: Promises still to keep (pp. 223-251). Chicago: Planner's Press.
39. Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).
40. Kolnick, K. (2008). Order before zoning: Land use regulation in Los Angeles, 1880-1915. Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
41. Korngold, G. (2001). The emergence of private land use controls in large-scale subdivisions: The companion story to Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. Case Western Reserve Law Review,51(4), 617-643.
42. Krueckeberg, D. (1983). The culture of planning. In D. Krueckeberg (Ed.), Introduction to planning history in the United States (pp. 1-12). New Brunswick, NJ: The Center for Urban Policy Research
43. Lang, R., & Nelson, A. (2007). Boomburb politics and the rise of private government. Housing Policy Debate, 18(3), 627-634.
44. Large, D. (1973). This land is whose land? Changing concepts of land as property. Wisconsin Law Review, 1039-1083.
45. Legates, R., & Stout, F. (2000). Modernism and early urban planning, 1870-1940. In R. Legates & F. Stout (Eds.), The city reader (2nd ed., pp. 299-313). New York: Routledge.
46. McClaughry, J. (1975). The new feudalism. Environmental Law, 5(3), 675-702.
47. McClaughry, J. (1976). Farmers, freedom, and feudalism: How to avoid the coming serfdom. South Dakota Law Review, 21(3), 486-541.
48. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49. Mohl, R. A. (1993). Shifting patterns of American urban policy since 1900. In A. Hirsch & R. A. Mohl (Eds.), Urban policy in twentieth century America (pp. 1-31). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
50. Mohl, R. A. (2004). Stop the road: Freeway revolts in American cities. Journal of Urban History, 30(5), 674-706.
51. Moynihan, D. P. (1969). Maximum feasible misunderstanding: Community action in the war on poverty. New York: Free Press.
52. Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
53. Nelson, R. H. (2003). The rise of the private neighborhood association: A Constitutional revolution in local government. In D. Netzer (Ed.), The property tax, land use and land use regulation (pp. 209-272). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
54. New plan for building heights and restricted areas will stabilize values, home and business conditions. (1916, July 30). New York Times p 6.
55. Olmsted, F. L., Jr. (1916). Introduction. In J. Nolen (Ed.), City planning: A series of papers presenting the essential elements of a city plan (pp. 1-18). New York: D. Appleton and Co.
56. Peattie, L. (1968). Reflections on advocacy planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34(2), 80-88.
57. Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922).
58. Peterson, J. A. (2003). The birth of city planning in the United States, 1840-1917. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
59. Pollot, M. L. (1989). The effect of the federal takings Executive Order. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest, 41(5), 3-7.
60. Popper, F. (1988). Understanding American land use regulation since 1970. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54 (3), 291-301.
61. Reps, J. (1964). Requiem for zoning. Planning 1964, 54-67.
62. Revell, K. D. (1999). The road to Euclid v. Ambler: City planning, state-building, and the changing scope of the police power. Studies in American Political Development, 13(1), 50-145.
63. Schmidt, S. (2008). The evolving relationship between open space preservation and local planning practice. Journal of Planning History, 7(2), 91-112.
64. Scott, M. (1969). American city planning since 1890: A history commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the American Institute of Planners. Berkeley: University of California Press.
65. Stilgoe, J. (1988). Borderland: Origins of the American suburb, 1820-1939. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66. Stone, C. (1974). Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.
67. Talen, E. (2005). New urbanism and American planning: The conflict of cultures. New York: Routledge.
68. Teaford, J. (2000). Urban renewal and its aftermath. Housing Policy Debate, 11(2), 443-465.
69. U.S. Census Bureau. (1926). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
70. Weiss, M. (1980). The origins and legacy of urban renewal. In P. Clavel, J. Forester, & W. Goldsmith (Eds.), Urban and regional planning in an age of austerity (pp. 53-80). New York: Pergamon Press.
71. Weiss, M. (1987). The rise of the community builders: The American real estate industry and urban land planning. New York: Columbia University Press.
72. Weitz, J. (1999). From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. Journal of Planning Literature, 14(2), 266-337.
73. Williams, N. (1971). The three systems of land use control (or, exclusionary zoning and revision of the enabling legislation). Rutgers Law Review, 25(1), 80-101.
74. Yandle, B. (Ed.). (1995). Land rights: The 1990's property rights rebellion. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.