Robot-assisted anterior lumbar interbody fusion in a swine model in vivo test of the da vinci surgical-assisted spinal surgery system

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Yang, Moon Sool ^a   Yoon, Do Heum ^a   Kim, Keung Nyun ^a   Kim, Hoon ^a   Yang, Joong Won ^a   Yi, Seong ^a   Lee, John Y K ^b   Jung, Woo Ju ^a   Rha, Koon Ho ^a   Ha, Yoon ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

minimally invasive; Robotics; spinal fusion; surgical procedures; video assisted surgery

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CAGE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DA VINCI SURGICAL ASSISTED SPINE SURGERY; EUTHANASIA; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MALE; NERVE INJURY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY; ROBOTICS; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIDEO ASSISTED SURGERY;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, ANIMAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SPINAL FUSION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SWINE; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 79551512793     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d40ba3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389-402.
2. Ballantyne GH, Moll F. The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1293-304.
3. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, et al. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 2004;239:14-21.
4. Lee JY, O'Malley B, Newman JG, et al. Transoral robotic surgery of cranio cervical junction and atlantoaxial spine: a cadaveric study. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:13-18.
5. Mathews HH, Evans MT, Molligan HJ, et al. Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary review. Spine 1995;20:1797.
6. Kaiser MG, Haid RW, Subach BR, et al. Comparison of the miniopen versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 2002;51:97-103; discussion 103-5.
7. Kang BU, Choi WC, Lee SH, et al. An analysis of general surgeryrelated complications in a series of 412 minilaparotomic anterior lumbosacral procedures. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;10:60-5.
8. Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2000;214: 129-40.
9. Mack MJ. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 2001;285:568-72.
10. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2004;18:790-5.
11. Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, et al. Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system. Am J Surg 2004;187:309-15.
12. Maniar HS, Council ML, Prasad SM, et al. Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption. J Surg Res 2005;125:23-9.
13. Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology 2006;68:1077-81.
14. Kaouk JH, Hafron J, Parekattil S, et al. Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results. J Endourol 2008;22:2153-9.
15. Tatooles AJ, Pappas PS, Gordon PJ, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1978-82; discussion 1982.
16. Chitwood WR, Rodriguez E, Chu MW, et al. Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136:436-41.
17. O'Malley BW, Weinstein GS. Robotic skull base surgery: preclinical investigations to human clinical application. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:1215-19.
18. Weinstein GS, O'Malley BW, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope 2005;115: 1315-19.
19. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Schuler TC, et al. Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91:1181-9.
20. Gazzeri R, Tamorri M, Galarza M, et al. Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless approach (BERG) for lumbar interbody fusion: is it a valid alternative to the laparoscopic approach? Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50:150-4.
21. Chung SK, Lee SH, Lim SR, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2003;12:613-17.
22. Inamasu J, Guiot BH. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review of outcome studies. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005;48:340-7.
23. Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, et al. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1383-9.
24. Mauroy B, Demondion X, Drizenko A, et al. The inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic plexus): its importance in neural preservation techniques. Surg Radiol Anat 2003;25:6-15.
25. Frumovitz M, Sun C, Schover LR, et al. Quality of life and sexual functioning in cervical cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7428-36.
26. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 2005;92: 1124-32.
27. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:1551-6.
28. Tewari A, Rao S, Martinez-Salamanca JI, et al. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008;101:1013-18.
29. Casale P, Patel RP, Kolon TF. Nerve sparing robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation. J Urol 2008;179:1987-90.
30. Bozkus H, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, et al. Comparative anatomy of the porcine and human thoracic spines with reference to thoracoscopic surgical techniques. Surg Endosc 2005;19: 1652-65.
31. Ponnusamy K, Chewning S, Mohr C. Robotic approaches to the posterior spine. Spine 2009;34:2104-9.