Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: Initial experience and long-term results

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2153-2159

  Kaouk, Jihad H ^a   Hafron, Jason ^a   Parekattil, Sijo ^a   Moinzadeh, Alireza ^a   Stein, Robert ^a   Gill, Inderbir S ^a   Hegarty, Nicholas ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MERTIATIDE TC 99M;

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; PYELOTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 52449086449     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0130     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Schultheiss D, Rathert P, Becht, E. [History of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair (pyeloplasty). From Trendelenburg (1886) to the present]. Urologe A 2004;43:1544-1559.
2. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-1799.
3. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256.
4. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 2002;60:39-45.
5. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002;42:453.
6. Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Forster T, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): solving the technical difficulties. Eur Urol 2006;49:264-272.
7. Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX Jr. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2005;48:973-977.
8. Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001;66:48-50.
9. Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol 2004;171:2629-2631.
10. Gill IS, Grune MT, Munch LC. Access technique for retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 1996;156:1120-1124.
11. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256.
12. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winklemann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002;42:268-277.
13. Munver R, Sosa RE, del Pizzo JJ. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: history, evolution, and future. J Endourol 2004;18:748-755.
14. Berglund RK, Gill IS, Babineau D, Desai M, Kaouk JH. A prospective comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in the extremely obese patient. BJU Int 2007;99:871-874.
15. Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2005;173:38-41.
16. Meraney AM, Sammee AA, Gill IS. Vascular and bowel complications during retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 2002;168:1941-1944.
17. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. J Urol 1995;154:479-483.
18. Rubinstein M, Finelli A, Moinzadeh M, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urology 2005;63:41-44.
19. Bhayani S, Link RE, Varkaraki, JM, Kavoussi LR. Complete da Vinci versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: cost analysis. J Endourol 2005;19:327-332.
20. Luke PP, Girvan AR, Al Omar M, Beasley KA, Carson M. Laparoscopic robotic pyeloplasty using the Zeus telesurgical system. Can J Urol 2004;11:2396-2400.
21. Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Gettman MT. Robotic pyeloplasty: technique and results. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:737-741.
22. Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 2002;60:509-513.
23. Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R, et al. Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up. World J Urol 2003;21:133-138.
24. Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience. J Endourol 2005;19:382-386.
25. Siddiq FM, Leveillee RJ, Villicana P, Bird VG. Computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: university of Miami experience with the da Vinci surgical system. J Endourol 2005;19:387-392.
26. Mendez-Torres F, Woods M, Thomas R. Technical modification for robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2005;19:393-396.
27. Chammas MF, Hubert J, Patel VR. Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a transatlantic comparison of techniques and outcomes. BJU Int 2007;99:1113-1117.