Transoral robotic surgery: Supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model

Laryngoscope

Volumn 115, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1315-1319

  Weinstein, Gregory S ^a,b   O'Malley Jr , Bert W ^a   Hockstein, Neu G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Da Vinci; Endoscopic; Laryngeal cancer; Larynx; Microsurgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Partial laryngectomy; Robotic; Transoral robotic surgery (TORS)

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; DOG; HEMOSTASIS; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX CANCER; MICROSURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SUBMUCOSA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VIDEORECORDING;

ANIMALS; DOGS; LARYNGECTOMY; MOUTH; ROBOTICS;

EID: 21844462825     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000170848.76045.47     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Rudert HH, Werner JA, Hoft S. Transoral carbon dioxide laser resection of supraglottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:819-827.
2. Steiner W. Results of curative laser microsurgery of laryngeal carcinomas. Am J Otolaryngol 1993;14:116-121.
3. Boehm DH, Arnold MB, Detter C, Reichenspurner HC. Incorporating robotics into an open-heart program. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1369-1380.
4. Binder J, Brautigam R, Jonas D, Bentas W. Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy? BJU Int 2004;94:1183-1187.
5. Jacobsen G, Berger R, Horgan S. The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003;13: 279-283.
6. Advincula AP, Falcone T. Laparoscopic robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004;31:599-609, ix-x.
7. Gourin CG, Terris DJ. Surgical robotics in otolaryngology: expanding the technology envelope. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;12:204-208.
8. Haus BM, Kambham N, Le D, et al. Surgical robotic applications in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2003;113: 1139-1144.
9. Hockstein NG, Nolan P, O'Malley J, et al. Robotic microlaryngeal surgery: a technical feasibility study using the da Vinci surgical robot and an airway mannequin. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:780-785.
10. Hockstein NG, Nolan P, O'Malley J, et al. Robot-assisted microlaryngeal surgery: results of robotic cadaver dissections. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:1003-1008.
11. National Academy of Sciences. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: DHHS Publication, NIH No 85-23, revised 1985.
12. Carew JF, Ward RF, LaBruna A, et al. Effects of scalpel, electrocautery, and CO2 and KTP lasers on wound healing in rat tongues. Laryngoscope 1998;108:373-380.
13. Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ. A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;116:379-385.
14. Oluwasanmi AF, Mal RK. Diathermy epiglottectomy: endoscopic technique. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:289-292.
15. Steiner W, Ambrosch P. Endoscopic Laser Surgery of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract, 1st ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Gerg Thieme Verlag, 2000.