Comparison of visual analogue and Likert scales in evaluation of an emergency department bedside teaching programme

EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 68-75

  Celenza, Antonio ^a   Rogers, Ian R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Education; Emergency medicine; Professional; Visual analogue scale

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSULTATION; EMERGENCY WARD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIKERT SCALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; URBAN AREA; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TEACHING;

EID: 79551489226     PISSN: 17426731     EISSN: 17426723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01352.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Penciner R. Clinical teaching in a busy emergency department: strategies for success. Can. J. Emerg. Med. 2002; 4: 287-90.
2. Burdick WP, Schoffstall J. Observation of emergency medicine residents at the bedside: how often does it happen? Acad. Emerg. Med. 1995; 2: 909-13.
3. Chisholm CD, Whenmouth LF, Daly EA, Cordell WH, Giles BK, Brizendine EJ. An evaluation of emergency medicine resident interaction time with faculty in different teaching venues. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2004; 11: 149-55.
4. Shayne P, Heilpern K, Ander D, Palmer-Smith V. Emory University Department of Emergency Medicine Education Committee. Protected clinical teaching time and a bedside evaluation instrument in an emergency medicine training program. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2002; 9: 1342-9.
5. Cydulka RK, Emerman CL, Jouriles NJ. Evaluation of resident performance and intensive bedside teaching during direct observation. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1996; 3: 345-51.
6. Alam MN, Lang ES, Ross J etal. Evaluation of a dedicated teaching shift involving direct bedside observation of trainees by attending staff. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2004; 11: 479-80.
7. Kelly A. Getting more out of clinical experience in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. (Fremantle) 2002; 14: 127-30.
8. Celenza A, Rogers IR. Qualitative evaluation of a formal bedside clinical teaching programme in an emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 2006; 23: 769-73.
9. Foley DK. Development of a visual analogue scale to measure curriculum outcomes. J. Nurs. Educ. 2008; 47: 209-13.
10. Turner NM, van de Leemput AJ, Draaisma JMT, Oosterveld P, ten Cate OTJ. Validity of the visual analogue scale as an instrument to measure self-efficacy in resuscitation skills. Med. Educ. 2008; 42: 503-11.
11. Sutherland HJ, Dunn V, Boyd NF. Measurement of values for states of health with linear analogue scales. Med. Decis. Making 1983; 4: 234-42.
12. Gudex C, Dolan P, Kind P, Williams A. Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Qual. Life. Res. 1996; 5: 521-31.
13. Parkin D, Devlin N. Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis? Health Econ. 2006; 15: 653-64.
14. Badia X, Monserrat S, Roset M, Herdman M. Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off. Qual. Life. Res. 1999; 8: 303-10.
15. Johannesson M, Jonsson B, Karlsson G. Outcome measurement in economic evaluation. Health Econ. 1996; 5: 279-96.
16. Quilter SM, Band JP, Miller GM. Measuring mental health imagery with visual analogue scales. J. Mental Health Counselling 1999; 21: 161-72.
17. Todd KH. Pain assessment instruments for use in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. Clin. North. Am. 2005; 23: 285-95.
18. Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad. Emerg. Med. 1998; 5: 1086-90.