Prediction of protein binding regions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 888-897

  Chennamsetty, Naresh ^a   Voynov, Vladimir ^a   Kayser, Veysel ^a   Helk, Bernhard ^b   Trout, Bernhardt L ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Genetic engineering; Molecular simulation; Protein aggregation; Protein protein interactions; Spatial aggregation propensity

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; FC RECEPTOR; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G1 ANTIBODY; PROTEIN A; PROTEIN G; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR ALPHA;

ANTIBODY STRUCTURE; ARTICLE; GENE MAPPING; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

BINDING SITES; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTOR, EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR;

EID: 79551480295     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22926     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Halatsch ME, Schmidt U, Behnke-Mursch J, Unterberg A, Wirtz CR. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and other malignant brain tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 2006; 32: 74-89.
2. Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. The impact of structural genomics: expectations and outcomes. Science 2006; 311: 347-351.
3. Norvell JC, Machalek AZ. Structural genomics programs at the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Nat Struct Biol 2000; 7: 931.
4. Terwilliger TC. Structural genomics in North America. Nat Struct Biol 2000; 7: 935-939.
5. Watson JD, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15: 275-284.
6. Jones S, Thornton JM. Searching for functional sites in protein structures. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004; 8: 3-7.
7. Huang B, Schroeder M. Using protein binding site prediction to improve protein docking. Gene 2008; 422: 14-21.
8. Vries SD, van Dirj A, Bonvin A. WHISCY: what information does surface conservation yield? Application to data-driven docking. Proteins 2006; 63: 479-489.
9. Gottschalk K, Neuvirth H, Schreiber G. A novel method for scoring of docked protein complexes using predicted protein-protein binding sites. Protein Eng 2004; 17: 183-189.
10. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002; 47: 409-443.
11. Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 1990; 31: 7134-7155.
12. Guharoy M, Chakrabarti P. Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 43: 15447-15452.
13. Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 13-20.
14. Young L, Jernigan RL, Covell DG. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci 1994; 3: 717-729.
15. Tsai C, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci 1997; 6: 53-64.
16. Conte LL, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999; 285: 2177-2198.
17. DeLano WL, Ultsch MH, de Vos AM, Wells JA. Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface. Science 2000; 287: 1279-1283.
18. Nooren IM, Thornton JM. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 2003; 325: 991-1018.
19. Glaser F, Steinberg DM, Vakser IA, Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2001; 43: 89-102.
20. Larsen TA, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS. Morphology of protein-protein interfaces. Structure 1998; 6: 421-427.
21. Šikić M, Tomić S, Vlahoviček K. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in sequences and 3D structures by random forests. PLoS Comput Biol 2009; 5: e1000278.
22. Ofran Y, Rost B. ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: e13-e16.
23. Res I, Mihalek I, Lichtarge O. An evolution based classifier for prediction of protein interfaces without using protein structures. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2496-2501.
24. Liang S, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucl Acids Res 2006; 34: 3698-3707.
25. Porollo A, Meller J. Prediction-based finger-prints of protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2007; 66: 630-645.
26. Bradford JR, Westhead DR. Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 1487-1494.
27. Chen H, Zhou HX. Prediction of interface residues in protein-protein complexes by a consensus neural network method: test against NMR data. Proteins 2005; 61: 21-35.
28. Aytuna AS, Gursoy A, Keskin O. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2850-2855.
29. H. Neuvirth, R. Raz, Schreiber, G. Promate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 2004; 338: 181-199.
30. Jones S, Thornton JM. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J Mol Biol 1997; 272: 133-143.
31. Lichtarge O, Sowa ME. Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12: 21-27.
32. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor-Shental D, Martz E, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 163-164.
33. Guney E, Tuncbag N, Keskin O, Gursoy A. HotSprint: database of computational HotSpots at protein interfaces. Nucl Acids Res 2007; 36: D662-D666.
34. Simon AL, Stone EA, Sidow A. Inference of functional regions in proteins by quantification of evolutionary constraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 2912-2917.
35. Chennamsetty N, Voynov V, Kayser V, Helk B, Trout BL. Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 11937-11942.
36. Chennamsetty N, Helk B, Voynov V, Kayser V, Trout BL. Aggregation prone motifs in Human immunoglobulin G. J Mol Biol 2009; 391: 404-413.
37. Voynov V, Chennamsetty N, Kayser V, Helk B, Trout BL. Predictive tools for stabilization of therapeutic proteins. MAbs 2009; 1: 580-582.
38. Chennamsetty N, Voynov V, Kayser V, Helk B, Trout BL. Prediction of aggregation prone regions of therapeutic proteins. J Phys Chem B 2010; 114: 6614-6624.
39. Saphire EO, Parren PW, Pantophlet R, Zwick MB, Morris GM, Rudd PM, Dwek RA, Stanfield RL, Burton DR, Wilson IA. Crystal structure of a neutralizing human IGG against HIV-1: a template for vaccine design. Science 2001; 293: 1155-1159.
40. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan W, Karplus MJ. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. Comput Chem 1983; 4: 187-217.
41. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kalé L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1781-1802.
42. MacKerell AD, Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, III, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of protein. J Phys Chem B 1998; 102: 3586-3616.
43. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983; 79: 926-935.
44. Kuttel M, Brady JW, Naidoo KJ. Carbohydrate solution simulations: producing a force field with experimentally consistent primary alcohol rotational frequencies and populations. J Comput Chem 2002; 23: 1236-1243.
45. Black SD, Mould DR. Development of hydrophobicity parameters to analyze proteins which bear post- or cotranslational modifications. Anal Biochem 1991; 193: 72-82.
46. Radaev S, Motyka S, Fridman WH, Sautes-Fridman C, Sun PD. The structure of a human type III Fcγ receptor in complex with Fc. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 16469-16477.
47. Deisenhofer J, Jones TA, Huber R, Sjodahl J, Sjoquist J. Crystallization, crystal structure analysis and atomic model of the complex formed by a human Fc fragment and fragment B of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus. Hoppe-Seyler's Z Physiol Chem 1978; 359: 975-985.
48. Deisenhofer J. Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of a human Fc fragment and its complex with fragment B of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus at 2.9- and 2.8-A resolution. Biochemistry 1981; 20: 2361-2370.
49. Sauer-Eriksson AE, Kleywegt GJ, Uhlen M, Jones TA. Crystal structure of the C2 fragment of streptococcal protein G in complex with the Fc domain of human IgG. Structure 1995; 3: 265-278.
50. Pechmann S, Levy ED, Tartaglia GG, Vendruscolo M. Physicochemical principles that regulate the competition between functional and dysfunctional association of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 10159-10164.
51. Wang X, Das TK, Singh SK, Kumar S. Potential aggregation prone regions in biotherapeutics. MAbs 2009; 1: 1-14.
52. Ogiso H, Ishitani R, Nureki O, Fukai S, Yamanaka M, Kim JH, Saito K, Inoue M, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S. Crystal structure of the complex of human epidermal growth factor and receptor extracellular domains. Cell 2002; 110: 775-787.
53. Garrett TP, McKern NM, Lou M, Elleman TC, Adams TE, Lovrecz GO, Zhu HJ, Walker F, Frenkel MJ, Hoyne PA, Jorissen RN, Nice EC, Burgess AW, Ward CW. Crystal structure of a truncated epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain bound to transforming growth factor alpha. Cell 2002; 110: 763-773.