Ambiguous words are harder to learn

Bilingualism

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 299-314

  Degani, Tamar ^a   Tokowicz, Natasha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79451475734     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990411     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451-474.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 186-197.
3. Armstrong, B. C., & Plaut, D. C. (2008). Settling dynamics in distributed networks explain task differences in semantic ambiguity effects: Computational and behavioral evidence. Presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Washington University, http://elexicon.wustl.edu/ (retrieved August 14, 2007).
5. Boada, R., Śanchez-Casas, R., García-Albea, J. E., Gaviln, J.M., & Ferr, P. (2009). Effect of number of translations and cognate status in translation recognition performance of proficient bilinguals. Presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Bilingualism, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
6. Bogaards, P. (2001). Lexical units and the learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 321-343.
7. Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Monolingual, bilingual, trilingual: Infants' language experience influences the development of a word-learning heuristic. Developmental Science, 12, 815-823.
8. Degani, T., Prior, A., & Tokowicz, N. (in press). Bidirectional transfer: The effect of sharing a translation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
9. Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (in press). Semantic ambiguity within and across languages: An integrative review. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
10. Doherty, M. J. (2004). Children's difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 31, 203-214.
11. Dufour, R., & Kroll, J. F. (1995). Matching words to concepts in two languages: A test of the concept mediation model of bilingual representation. Memory and Cognition, 23, 166-180.
12. Duyck, W., & de Houwer, J. (2008). Semantic access in second-language visual word processing: Evidence from the semantic Simon paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 961-966.
13. Electronic commerce. (2007). Dictionary.com. http://dictionary.com (retrieved October 22, 2007).
14. Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and L2 processing of homonyms in sentential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 256-283.
15. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Prince, P. (1997). Second language autonomy. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 481-501.
16. Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bailey, L. M., & Wenger,N. R. (1992).Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology, 28, 99-108.
17. Jiang, N. (2002). Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 617-637.
18. Jiang, N. (2004). Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 416-432.
19. Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 259-282.
20. Klepousniotou, E., & Baum, S. R. (2007). Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 1-24.
21. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.
22. Lotto, L., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Effects of learning method and word type on acquiring vocabulary in an unfamiliar language. Language Learning, 48, 31-69.
23. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the Competition Model. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives, pp. 113-142. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121-157.
25. Mazzocco, M. M. M. (1997). Children's interpretations of homonyms: A developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 441-467.
26. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
27. Prior, A., MacWhinney, B., & Kroll, J. F. (2007). Translation norms for English and Spanish: The role of lexical variables, word class, and L2 proficiency in negotiating translation ambiguity. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 1029-1038.
28. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245-266.
29. Śanchez-Casas, R., Buratti, B. S., & Igoa, J. M. (1992). Are bilingual lexical representations interconnected? Presented at the Fifth Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Paris, France.
30. Storkel, H. L., & Maekawa, J. (2005). A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and word frequency. Journal of Child Language, 32, 827-853.
31. Talamas, A., Kroll, J. F., & Dufour, R. (1999). From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 45-58.
32. Tokowicz, N. (2005). The role of proficiency in the influence of L1/L2 differences on L2 processing. Presented at symposium Cross-language Interaction at Different Levels of Proficiency: Psycholinguistic Studies of Late L2 Learners, chaired by J. G. van Hell& T. Dijkstra, held at the Fifth International Symposium onBilingualism, Barcelona, Spain.
33. Tokowicz, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2007). Number of meanings and concreteness: Consequences of ambiguity within and across languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 727-779.
34. Tokowicz, N., Kroll, J. F., de Groot, A. M. B., & van Hell, J. G. (2002). Number-of-translation norms for Dutch-English translation pairs: A new tool for examining language production. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 435-451.
35. Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173-204.
36. Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F. (2004). The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255-272.
37. Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Smith, C. J. (2007). Choices, choices, choices: The consequences of activating too many translation alternatives. Presented at the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, CA.
38. Tokowicz, N., Prior, A., & Kroll, J. F. (2009). Bilingual speech production depends on translation ambiguity. Ms., University of Pittsburgh.
39. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
40. Wilson, M. D. (1988). The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, version 2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 20, 6-11.
41. WordNet 3.0, Princeton University, 2006.