Beyond the learning frontier and the human capital development: New and old technological opportunities for the competence-based enterprises

Knowledge and Process Management

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 270-279

  Capece, Guendalina ^a   Gitto, Simone ^a   Campisi, Domenico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251510069     PISSN: 10924604     EISSN: 10991441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.318     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 16: 227–247.
2. Bagozzi RP, Davis FD, Warshaw PR. 1992. Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7): 660–686.
3. Brandford BS, Sae-Wong L, Yeung SK. 2006. The impact of HR on professional competences in HRM: implications for the development of HR professionals. Human Resource Management 45: 295–308.
4. Becker GS. 1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Columbia University Press: New York, USA.
5. Benhabib J, Spiegel M. 1994. The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics 34: 143–173.
6. Bozeman B, Rogers JD. 2002. A churn model of scientific knowledge value: internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy 31: 769–794.
7. Bronzini R, Piselli P. 2006. Determination of long-run regional productivity: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Bank of Italy, Temi di discussione, No. 597.
8. Bucci A. 2003. R&D, imperfect competition and growth with human capital accumulation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 30(4): 417–439.
9. Czaja SJ, Hammond K, Blascovich JJ, Swede H. 1986. Learning to use a word processing system as a function of training strategy. Behavior and Information Technology 5: 203–216.
10. Davenport TH, Prusack L. 1998. Working Knowledge, How Organizations Manage What They Know. HBS Press: Boston, MA, USA.
11. Davis FD. 1986. Technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-users information system: theory and results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation; Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12. Davis FD. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and users acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1(3): 319–340.
13. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35: 982–1003.
14. de la Fuente A, da Rocha JM. 1996. Capytal humano y crecimiento: un panorama de la evincia empirica y algunos resultados para la OCDE. Moneta-e-Credito 203: 43–84.
15. Goldin C, Katz LF. 1998. The origins of technology-skill complementarity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(3): 693–732.
16. Howell DR, Wolff EN. 1991. Tends in the growth and distribution of skills in the U.S. workplace, 1960–85. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44(3): 486–502.
17. Kaminsky K, Rezabek L. 2000. Student perception: printing activities' influence on satisfaction with web-based instruction. National Convection of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Denver, CO.
18. Keil M, Beranek PM, Konsynski BR. 1995. Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems 13(9): 75–91.
19. Kim Y, Shim SJ, Yoon KP. 1999. Critical skills for is professionals: developing a curriculum for the future. Journal of Information Systems Education 11: 3–14.
20. Landry BJL, Grieffeth R, Hartman S. 2006. Measuring students perceptions of blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 4(1): 87–99.
21. Lightfoot D. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Blackwell: Oxford, UK.
22. Lucas RB. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.
23. Malone D. 2002. Knowledge management. A model for organizational learning. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 3: 111–123.
24. Mankiw G, Romer D, Weil D. 1992. A contribution to the empirics of economics growth. Quartely Journal of Economics 107: 407–437.
25. Mincer J. 1970. The distribution of labor incomes: a survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature 8(1): 1–26.
26. Moisio A, Riitta S. 2004. E-learning: a service offer. Knowledge and Process Management 11(4): 252–260.
27. Nelson R, Phelps E. 1966. Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. American Economic Review 61: 69–75.
28. O'Dell C, Grayson C. 1998. If Only We Knew What We Know: identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review 40(3): 154–174.
29. Redding S. 1996. The low-skill, low-quality-trap: strategic complementarities between human capital and R&D. Economic Journal 106: 458–470.
30. Schultz TW. 1961. Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review 51(1): 1–17.
31. Segars AH, Grover V. 1993. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly 17: 517–525.
32. Stewart T. 1986. Task fit, ease-of-use and computer facilities. In Managing Computer Impact: An International Study of Management and Organizations, Bjørn-Andersen N, Eason K, Robey D (eds). Ablex: Norwood, NJ; 63–76.
33. Stokey N. 1991. Human capital, product quality and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 587–601.
34. Ulrich D, Brockbank W, Yeung AK, Lake DG. 1995. Human resources competencies: an empirical assessment. Human Resource Management 34: 473–492.
35. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2): 186–204.