Representations underlying skill in the discrete sequence production task: Effect of hand used and hand position

Psychological Research

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 685-694

  de Kleine, Elian ^a   Verwey, Willem B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); ORIENTATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; SPACE PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 79151485052     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0174-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adam, J. J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2003). Preparing for perception and action (I): The role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 302-358.
2. Allport, D. A. (1980). Patterns and actions: Cognitive mechanisms are content-specific. In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 26-64). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
4. Bapi, R. S., Doya, K., & Harner, A. M. (2000). Evidence for effectorindependent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 132, 149-162.
5. Bapi, R. S., Miyapuram, K. P., Graydon, F. X., & Doya, K. (2006). fMRI investigation of cortical and subcortical networks in the learning of abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences. Neuroimage, 32, 714-727.
6. Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 319-349.
7. Deroost, N., Zeeuws, I., & Soetens, E. (2006). Effector-dependent and response location learning of probabilistic sequences in serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 469-480.
8. Fitts, P. M. (1964). Perceptual-motor skill learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 243-285). New York: Academic.
9. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (1998). Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 369-378.
10. Hardy, L., Mullen, R., & Jones, G. (1996). Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 621-636.
11. Harrington, D. L., Rao, S. M., Haaland, K. Y., Bobholz, J. A., Mayer, A. R., Binderx, J. R., et al. (2000). Specialized neural systems underlying representations of sequential movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 56-77.
12. Heuer, H., & Sangals, J. (1998). Task-dependent mixtures of coordinate systems in visuomotor transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 224-236.
13. Hikosaka, O., Nakahara, H., Rand, M. K., Sakai, K., Lu, X., Nakamura, K., et al. (1999). Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends in Neuroscience, 22, 464-471.
14. Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1997). Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 60, 87-97.
15. Koch, I. (2007). Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: Evidence from stimulus-response compatibility. Human Movement Science, 26, 257-274.
16. Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000a). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 863-882.
17. Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000b). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22-35.
18. Liu, T., Lungu, O. V., Waechter, T., Willingham, D. T., & Ashe, J. (2007). Frames of reference during implicit and explicit learning. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 273-280.
19. Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 350-364.
20. Park, J. H., & Shea, C. H. (2005). Sequence learning: Response structure and effector transfer. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 387-419.
21. Rhodes, B. J., Bullock, D., Verwey, W. B., Averbaeck, B. B., & Page, M. P. A. (2004). Learning and production of movement sequences: Behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives. Human Movement Science, 23, 699-746.
22. Rieger, M. (2004). Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 555-565.
23. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
24. Shaffer, L. H. (1991). Cognition and motor programming. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Turorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 371-383). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Ungerleider, L. G., Doyon, J., & Karni, A. (2002). Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 78, 553-564.
26. Verwey, W. B. (2001). Concatenating familiar movement sequences: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica, 106, 69-95.
27. Verwey, W. B. (2003). Processing modes and parallel processors in producing familiar keying sequences. Psychological Research, 67, 106-122.
28. Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2005). Effector-dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 69, 242-251.
29. Verwey, W. B., & Eikelboom, T. (2003). Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence-production task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 171-181.
30. Verwey, W. B., Lammens, R., & Van Honk, J. (2002). On the role of the SMA in the discrete sequence production task: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1268-1276.
31. Verwey, W. B., & Wright, D. L. (2004). Effector-independenst and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64-70.