Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: Evidence from stimulus-response compatibility

Human Movement Science

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 257-274

  Koch, Iring ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Motor chunking; S R compatibility; Sequence learning; Simon effect

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYMBOLISM; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; HUMANS; LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33947426497     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Clegg B.A. Stimulus-specific sequence representation in serial reaction time tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A (2005) 1087-1101
2. Cohen A., Ivry R.I., and Keele S.W. Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 (1990) 17-30
3. Curran T. Effects of aging on implicit sequence learning: Accounting for sequence structure and explicit knowledge. Psychological Research 60 (1997) 24-41
4. Deroost N., and Soetens E. The role of response selection in sequence learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2006) 449-456
5. Deroost N., and Soetens E. Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology 53 (2006) 16-30
6. Dienes Z., and Berry D. Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4 (1997) 3-23
7. Dutta A., and Proctor R.W. Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (1992) 801-809
8. Fitts P.M., and Posner M.I. Human performance (1967), Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA
9. Fitts P.M., and Seeger C.M. S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (1953) 199-210
10. Frensch P.A., and Miner C.S. Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory and Cognition 22 (1994) 95-110
11. Goschke T. Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. In: Stadler M.A., and Frensch P.A. (Eds). Handbook of implicit learning (1998), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 401-444
12. Hoffmann J., and Koch I. Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research 60 (1997) 87-97
13. Hoffmann J., and Koch I. Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In: Stadler M.A., and Frensch P.A. (Eds). Handbook of implicit learning (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 161-199
14. Hommel B. S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A (1996) 546-571
15. Keele S.W., Cohen A., and Ivry R. Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In: Jeannerod M. (Ed). Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (1990), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 77-110
16. Keele S.W., Ivry R., Mayr U., Hazeltine E., and Heuer H. The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 316-339
17. Keller, P., & Koch, I. (in press). Action planning in sequential skills: Relations to music performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
18. Keller P., and Koch I. The planning and execution of short auditory sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 (2006) 711-716
19. Koch I., and Hoffmann J. Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction time tasks. Psychological Research 67 (2000) 22-35
20. Koch I., and Hoffmann J. The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 863-882
21. Koch I., Keller P., and Prinz W. The ideomotor approach to movement control: Implications for skilled performance. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2 (2004) 362-375
22. Koch I., Philipp A.M., and Gade M. Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 346-350
23. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 253-270
24. Lien M.-C., and Proctor R.W. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (2002) 212-238
25. Lu C.-H., and Proctor R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 (1995) 174-207
26. Mayr U. Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 350-364
27. Nissen M.J., and Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 1-32
28. Proctor R.W., and Wang H. Enhancement of the Simon effect by response-location precues: Evaluation of the stimulus-identification account. Acta Psychologica 95 (1997) 279-298
29. Reed J., and Johnson P. Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (1994) 585-594
30. Shanks D.R., and St. John M.F. Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1994) 367-447
31. Simon J.R. The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. In: Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. (Eds). Advances in psychology Vol. 65 (1990), North-Holland, Amsterdam 31-86
32. Tubau E., and López-Moliner J. Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: The role of explicit knowledge. Psychological Research 68 (2004) 55-63
33. Vaquero J.M.M., Jiménez L., and Lupiánez J. The problem of reversals in assessing implicit sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research 175 (2006) 97-109
34. Verwey W.B. Processing modes and parallel processors in producing familiar keying sequences. Psychological Research 67 (2003) 106-122
35. Verwey W.B., and Clegg B.A. Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research 69 (2005) 242-251
36. Willingham D.B. Implicit motor learning is not purely perceptual. Memory and Cognition 27 (1999) 561-572
37. Wühr P. Response preparation modulates interference from irrelevant spatial information. Acta Psychologica 122 (2006) 206-220
38. Wulf G., and Prinz W. Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8 (2001) 648-660
39. Zirngibl C., and Koch I. The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning. Experimental Psychology 49 (2002) 153-162