Analyse the sources of equifinality in hydrological model using GLUE methodology

IAHS-AISH Publication

Volumn 331, Issue , 2009, Pages 130-138

  Lu, Li ^a,b   Jun, Xia ^a   Xu, Chong Yu ^c   Jianjing, Chu ^a,b   Rut, Wang ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

DTVGM; Equifinality; GLUE; Hydrological model; Multi objective function

Indexed keywords

BASEFLOWS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSTRAINT CONDITIONS; DTVGM; EQUIFINALITY; GENERALIZED LIKELIHOOD UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; INPUT DATAS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MONTE CARLO; MULTI-OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; NORTH CHINA; OBJECT FUNCTIONS; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY; RIVER BASINS; SEPARATION METHODS;

CLIMATE MODELS; ERRORS; GLUES; GLUING; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; INPUT OUTPUT PROGRAMS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; STREAM FLOW; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS; WATER RESOURCES;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DISCHARGE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; RIVER BASIN; STREAMFLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CHAOHE BASIN; CHINA;

EID: 78751655788     PISSN: 01447815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Beven, K. & Binley, A. (1992) Future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Processes 6(3), 279-298.
2. Beven, K. & Freer, J. (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. J. Hydrol. 249(1-4), 11-29.
3. Chapman, T. G. (1991) Comment on "Evaluation of Automated Techniques for Base Flow and Recession Analyses" by R. J. Nathan & T. A. McMahoa Water Resour. Res. 27(7), 1783-1784.
4. Choi, H. T. & Beven, K. (2007) Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework. J. Hydrol. 332(3-4), 316-336.
5. Engeland, K., Xu, C.-Y. & Gottschalk, L. (2005) Assessing uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology. Hydrol. Sci. J. 50(1), 45-63.
6. Franks, S. W., Beven, K. J., Chappell, N. A. & Gineste, P. (1997) The utility of multi-objective conditioning of a distributed hydrological model using uncertain estimates of saturated areas. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: MODSIM971,335-340.
7. Franks, S. W., Gineste, P., Beven, K. J. & Merot, P. (1998) on constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process. Water Resour. Res. 34,787-797.
8. Freer, J., Beven, K. & Ambroise, B. (1996) Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resour. Res. 32(7), 2161-2174.
9. Gallart, F., Latron, J. Llorens, P. & Beven, K. J. (2007) Using internal catchment information to reduce the uncertainty of discharge and baseflow predictions. Adv. Water Resour. 30(4), 808-823.
10. Huang, G. R. & Xie, H. H. (2007) Uncertainty analyses of watershed hydrological model based on GLUE method. J. South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) 35(3), 137-142,149 (in Chinese).
11. Kirkby, M. J. (1978) Hillslope Hydrology. Chichester, New York, USA.
12. Kuczera, G. & Mroczkowski, M. (1998) Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of multiresponse data. Adv. Water Resour. 34(6), 1481-1489.
13. Lyne, V. & Hollick M. (1979) Stochastic time-variable rainfall-runoff modelling. In: Institute of Engineers Australia National Conference. Publ. 79/10,89-93.
14. Mazvimavi, D., Meijerink, A. M. et al. (2004) Prediction of base flows from basin characteristics: a case study from Zimbabwe. Hydrol. Sci. J. 49(4), 703-715.
15. Mo, X. & Beven, K. (2004) Multi-objective parameter conditioning of a three-source wheat canopy model. Agricultural & Forest Meteorol. 122(1-2), 39-63.
16. Nash, J. E. & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1, A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10(3), 282-290.
17. Refsgaard, J. C. & Storm, B. (1996) Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models. Distributed Hydrological Modelling, 41-54.
18. Ren, X. S., He, Shan, et al. (2007) Water resources assessment of Hai River Basin. Chinese Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
19. Shu, Chang, Liu, S. X., Mo, X. G., Liang, Z. M. & Dai, Dong (2008) Uncertainty analysis of Xinanjiang model parameter. Geographical Res. 27(2), 343-352 (in Chinese).
20. Wang, G. S. (2005) Theory and method of distributed time-variant gain model doctoral thesis. Grad. Sch. of the Chin. Acad, of Sci., Beijing, China (in Chinese).
21. Weeks, W. D. & Boughton, W. C. (1987) Tests of ARMA model forms for rainfall-runoff modelling. J. Hydrol. 91(1/2).
22. Xia, J., O'Connor, K. M. et al. (1997) A non-linear perturbation model considering catchment wetness and its application in river flow forecasting. J. Hydrol. 200(1-4), 164-178.
23. Xia, J., Wang, G. S., Lv, A. F. & Tan, G. (2003) A research on distributed time variant gain modelling. Acta Geographica Sinica 58(05), 789-796 (in Chinese).
24. Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V. et al. (1998) Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. J. Hydrol. 204(1-4), 83-97.
25. Ysep, R. A. H. (1996) A computer program streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis. In: USGS Water Resources Investigations Report. USGS, Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA.
26. Zak, S. K. & Beven, K. J. (1999) Equifinality, sensitivity and predictive uncertainty in the estimation of critical loads. Science Total Environ. 236(1-3), 191-214.
27. Zeng, Z. X. (2005) The study of equifinality of conceptual rainfall-runoff model parameter. Master Thesis, Wu Han University,Wu Han, China.