Complementary approaches to assessing risk factors for interval breast cancer

Cancer Causes and Control

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 23-31

  Lowery, Jan T ^a   Byers, Tim ^a   Hokanson, John E ^a   Kittelson, John ^a   Lewin, John ^d   Risendal, Betsy ^a   Singh, Meenakshi ^b,c   Mouchawar, Judy ^e  

^a Food Science and Human Nutrition   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Diversified Radiology of Colorado   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethnicity; Family history; Interval breast cancer; Risk factor

Indexed keywords

ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RISK; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GROWTH RATE; HISPANIC; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 78751570943     PISSN: 09575243     EISSN: 15737225     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9663-x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. PL Porter AY El-Bastawissi MT Mandelson, et al. 1999 Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 91 23 2020 2028 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvVSitg%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/91.23.2020 10580027
2. FD Gilliland N Joste PM Stauber, et al. 2000 Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 9 743 749 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lsFersQ%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/92.9.743 10793111
3. M Crosier D Scott RG Wilson CD Griffiths FE May BR Westley 2001 High expression of the trefoil protein TFF1 in interval breast cancers Am J Pathol 159 1 215 221 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlslamurY%3D 11438468
4. MA Raja A Hubbard AR Salman 2001 Interval breast cancer: is it a different type of breast cancer? Breast 10 2 100 108 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2c%2Fns1ertA%3D%3D 10.1054/brst.2000.0217 14965568
5. CE Crane CG Luke JM Rogers PE Playford DM Roder 2002 An analysis of factors associated with interval as opposed to screen-detected breast cancers, including hormone therapy and mammographic density Breast 11 2 131 136 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2Fns1Gnsw%3D%3D 10.1054/brst.2001.0371 14965659
6. HC Burrell DM Sibbering A Wilson, et al. 1996 Screening interval cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors Radiology 199 3 811 817 1:STN:280:DyaK283itVGnug%3D%3D 8638010
7. PJ Klemi S Toikkanen O Rasanen I Parvinen H Joensuu 1997 Mammography screening interval and the frequency of interval cancers in a population-based screening Br J Cancer 75 5 762 766 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7psFKltw%3D%3D 9043038
8. AA Schroen T Wobbes RF van der Sluis 1996 Interval carcinomas of the breast: a group with intermediate outcome J Surg Oncol 63 3 141 144 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FpvFCrtQ%3D%3D 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199611)63:3<141:: AID-JSO2>3.0.CO;2-D 8944056
9. MT Mandelson N Oestreicher PL Porter 2000 Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 13 1081 1087 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvivFyrtA%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081 10880551
10. PA Carney DL Migliorettty BC Yankaskas, et al. 2003 Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 138 168 175 12558355
11. H Wang N Bjurstam H Bjorndal, et al. 2001 Interval cancers in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: frequency, characteristics and use of HRT Int J Cancer 94 594 598 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXns1Gnu70%3D 10.1002/ijc.1511 11745450
12. CT Brekelmans PH Peeters JA Faber JJ Duerenberg HJ Collette 1994 The epidemiologic profile of women with an interval cancer in the DOM screening programme Breast Cancer Res Treat 30 3 223 232 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Fnt1aktg%3D%3D 10.1007/BF00665964 7981442
13. K Kerlikowske D Grady J Barclay EA Sickles V Ernster 1996 Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography JAMA 276 33 38 1:STN:280:DyaK283ptVeqtQ%3D%3D 10.1001/jama.276.1.33 8667536
14. A Kavanagh H Mitchell G Giles 2000 Hormone replacement therapy and the accuracy of mammographic screening Lancet 355 270 274 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3cXhtlCgsbY%3D 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07319-5 10675074
15. RM Nixon P Pharoah L Tabar, et al. 1999 Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 48 325 333
16. K Kerlikowske PA Carner B Geller, et al. 2000 Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer Ann Intern Med 133 855 863 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltVOnuw%3D%3D 11103055
17. E Halapy AM Chiarelli N Klar JA Knight 2005 Accuracy of breast screening among women with and without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer Breast Ca Rsch Treat 90 299 305 10.1007/s10549-004-5168-1
18. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004). National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health
19. RM Elledge GM Clark GC Chamness CK Osborne 1994 Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among White, Hispanic and Black women in the United States J Natl Cancer Inst 86 9 705 712 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3htVGmsA%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/86.9.705 7908990
20. BA Jones SV Kasl MG Curnen PH Owens R Dubrow 1995 Can mammography screening explain the race difference in stage at diagnosis of breast cancer? Cancer 75 8 2103 2113 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3htFOisQ%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19950415) 75:8<2103::AID-CNCR2820750813>3.0.CO;2-2 7697601
21. CP Hunter CK Redmond VW Chen, et al. 1993 Breast cancer: factors associated with stage at diagnosis in black and white women. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group J Natl Cancer Inst 85 14 1129 1137 1:STN:280: DyaK3szgvVOntQ%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/85.14.1129 8320742
22. J Jacobellis G Cutter 2002 Mammography screening and differences in stage of disease by race/ethnicity Am J Public Health 92 7 1144 1150 10.2105/AJPH.92.7.1144 12084699
23. AJ Nixon D Neeuberg DF Hayes 1994 Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer J Clin Oncol 12 888 894 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3hs12gtA%3D%3D 8164038
24. H Eerola P Heikkila A Tamminen K Aittomaki C Blomqvist H Nevanlinna 2005 Histopathological features of breast tumours in BRCA1, BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families Breast Cancer Res 7 1 R93 R100 10.1186/bcr953 15642173
25. KA Phillips K Nichol H Ozcelik, et al. 1999 Frequency of p53 mutations in breast carcinomas from Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 mutations JNCI 91 469 473 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhvFKitLo%3D 10070948
26. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2002
27. S Hofvind B Moller S Thoresen G Ursin 2006 Use of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer detected at screening and between mammographic screens Int J Cancer 118 3112 3117 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XksVKlu7Y%3D 10.1002/ijc.21742 16395702
28. N Loman O Johannsson U Kristoffersson H Olsson A Borg 2001 Family history of breast and ovarian cancers and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of early-onset breast cancer JNCI 93 16 1215 1223 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXms1OrtLc%3D 11504767
29. AH Olsen K Bihrmann MB Jensen I Vejborg E Lynge 2009 Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study Br J Cancer 100 7 1205 1208 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3kslGqtQ%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604989 19293800
30. A Kavanaugh GB Byrnes C Nickson, et al. 2008 Using mammographic density to improve breast cancer outcomes CEBP 17 10 2818 2824
31. A McTiernan CF Martin JD Peck, et al. 2005 Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial J Natl Cancer Inst 97 18 1366 1376 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVKhsrjP 10.1093/jnci/dji279 16174858
32. JE Rossouw GL Anderson RL Prentice, et al. 2002 Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principle results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial JAMA 288 321 333 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xltlegs7k%3D 10.1001/jama.288.3.321 12117397
33. RT Chlebowski SL Hendrix RD Langer, et al. 2003 Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial JAMA 289 24 3243 3253 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkvVOktbg%3D 10.1001/jama.289.24.3243 12824205
34. BT Nicholson AP LoRusso M Smolkin VE Bovbjerg GR Petroni JA Harvey 2006 Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions Acad Radiol 13 9 1143 1149 10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.005 16935726
35. R Taylor R Supramaniam M Rickard J Estoesta C Moreira 2002 Interval breast cancers in New South Wales, Australia, and comparisons with trials and other mammographic screening programmes J Med Screen 9 1 20 25 1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jvFKhsg%3D%3D 10.1136/jms.9.1.20 11943793
36. M Moskowitz 1986 Breast cancer: age-specific growth rates and screening strategies Radiology 161 37 41 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FhslKksA%3D%3D 3532183
37. L Tabar HH Chen G Fagerberg SW Duffy TC Smith 1997 Recent results from the Swedish Two-County Trial: the effects of age, histologic type, and mode of detection on the efficacy of breast cancer screening J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 43 47 9709274
38. SW Duffy NE Day L Tabar, et al. 1997 Markov models of tumor progression: some age-specific results J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 93 97 9709283
39. L Tabar G Fagerberg SW Duffy 1995 Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial Cancer 75 10 2507 2517 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3lsVCguw%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19950515)75:10<2507::AID- CNCR2820751017>3.0.CO;2-H 7736395
40. DS Buist PL Porter C Lehman SH Taplin E White 2004 Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 J Natl Cancer Inst 96 19 1432 1440 10.1093/jnci/djh269 15467032
41. C Nickson AM Kavanagh 2009 Tumor size at detection according to different measures of mammographic breast density J Med Screen 16 3 140 146 10.1258/jms.2009.009054 19805755
42. MA Roubidoux JE Bailey LA Wray MA Helvie 2004 Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors Radiology 230 1 42 48 10.1148/radiol.2301020589 14695385
43. YP Guo LJ Martin W Janna D Banerjee 2001 Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities CEBP 10 243 248 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjtVWmsbg%3D
44. KS Gill BC Yankaskas 2004 Screening mammography performance and cancer detection among black women and white women in community practice Cancer 100 1 139 148 10.1002/cncr.11878 14692034
45. RD Rosenberg JF Lando WC Hunt, et al. 1996 The New Mexico Mammography Project Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993 Cancer 78 8 1731 1739 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fht1eksw%3D%3D 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0142(19961015)78:8<1731::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-Z 8859186
46. SP Poplack AN Tosteson MR Grove WA Wells PA Carney 2000 Mammography in 53, 803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network Radiology 217 3 832 840 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FotVOmtw%3D%3D 11110951
47. K Gower-Thomas H Fielder L Branston S Greening H Beer C Rogers 2002 Reviewing interval cancers: Time well spent? Clin Radiol 57 384 388 10.1053/crad.2001.0882 12014936
48. J McCann PD Britton RML Warren G Hunnam 2001 Radiological peer review of interval cancers in the East Anglian breast screening programme: what are we missing? Jr Med Screen 8 2 77 83 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlyltA%3D%3D 10.1136/jms.8.2.77
49. PJ Klemi S Toikkanen O Rasanen I Parvinen H Joensuu 1997 Mammography screening interval and the frequency of interval cancers in a population-based screening Br Jr Cancer 75 5 762 766 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7psFKltw%3D%3D
50. MA Raja A Hubbard AR Salman 2001 Interval breast cancer: is it a different type of breast cancer? Breast 10 2 100 108 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2c%2Fns1ertA%3D%3D 10.1054/brst.2000.0217 14965568