Interval carcinomas of the breast: A group with intermediate outcome

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 141-144

  Schroën, Alma A ^a   Wobbes, Theo ^a   Van Der Sluis, Rigtje F ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

breast neoplasms; interval carcinoma; screening; survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS; AXILLA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0029826209     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199611)63:3<141::AID-JSO2>3.0.CO;2-D     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Holmberg LH, Adami HO, Tabár L, Bergström R: Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinations. Lancet II:27-30, 1986.
2. Frisell J, Eklund G, Hellström L, Somell A: Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm. Breast Cancer Res Treat 9:219-225, 1987.
3. DeGrootte R, Rush BF, Milazzo J, et al.: Interval breast cancer: A more aggressive subset of breast neoplasias. Surgery 94:543-547, 1983.
4. Anderson I. What can we learn from interval carcinomas? Recent Cancer Res 90:219-225, 1984.
5. Ikeda DM, Andersson I, Wattsgård C, et al.: Interval carcinomas in the Malmö mammographic screening trial. Radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. Am J Roengenol 159:287-294, 1992.
6. Hendriks JHCL. Population screening for breast cancer by means of mammography in Nijmegen, 1975-1980, thesis, Nijmegen University, Nijmegen, Thieme bv, 1982.
7. Crisp WJ, Higgs MJ, Cowan WK, et al.: Screening for breast cancer detects tumours at an earlier biological stage. Br J Surg 80:863-865, 1993.
8. Kallioniemi O, Kärkkäinen A, Auvinen O, et al.: DNA flow cytometric analysis indicates that many breast cancers detected in the first round of mammographic screening have a low malignant potential. Int J Cancer 42:697-702, 1988.
9. Klemi PJ, Joensuu H, Toikkanen S, et al.: Aggressiveness of breast cancers found with and without screening. Br Med J 304:467-469, 1992.
10. Rosen von A, Erhardt K, Hellström L, et al.: Assessment of malignancy potential in so-called interval mammary carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 6:221-227, 1985.
11. Arnerlöv C, Emdin SO, Lundgren B, et al.: Breast carcinoma growth rate described by mammographic doubling time and S-phase fraction. Cancer 70:1928-1934, 1992.