Accuracy of breast screening among women with and without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 299-305

  Halapy, Erika ^a,c   Chiarelli, Anna M ^a   Klar, Neil ^a   Knight, Julia A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Family history; Interval cancer rate; Screening; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER FAMILY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OVARY CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PEDIGREE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 17744383989     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-5168-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. LL Humphrey M Helfand BKS Chan SH Woolf 2002 Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 137 347 360
2. (CGHFBC) CollaborativeGrouponHormonalFactorsinBreast Cancer, 2001,Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease,Lancet,358:1389 - 1399.
3. S Shapiro W Venet P Strax L Venet R Roeser 1982 Ten to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality J Natl Cancer Inst 69 349 355
4. L Tabar CJ Fagerberg A Gad L Baldetorp LH Holmberg O Grontoft U Ljungquist B Lundstrom JC Manson G Eklund 1985 Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare Lancet 1 829 832
5. S Shapiro EA Coleman M Broeders M Codd H de Koning J Fracheboud S Moss E Paci S Stachenko R Ballard-Barbash 1998 Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines Int J Epidemiol 27 735 742
6. NE Day DRR Williams KT Khaw 1989 Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system Br J Cancer 59 954 958
7. K Kerlikowske PA Carney B Geller MT Mandelson SH Taplin K Malvin V Ernster N Urban G Cutter R Rosenberg R Ballard-Barbash 2000 Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer Ann Intern Med 133 855 863
8. E Banks G Reeves V Beral D Bull B Crossley M Simmonds E Hilton S Bailey N Barrett P Briers R English A Jackson E Kutt J Lavelle L Rockall MG Wallis M Wilson J Patnick 2004 Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study BMJ 329 477 482
9. K Kerlikowske D Grady J Barclay EA Sickles V Ernster 1996 Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography JAMA 276 33 38
10. J Kollias DM Sibbering RW Blamey PAM Holland Z Obuszko ARM Wilson AJ Evans IO Ellis CW Elston 1998 Screening women aged less than 50 years with a family history of breast cancer Eur J Cancer 34 878 883
11. RD Macmillan 2000 Screening women with a family history of breast cancer - results from the British Familial Breast Cancer Group Eur J Surg Oncol 26 149 152
12. EE Halapy AM Chiarelli N Klar J Knight 2004 Breast screening outcomes in women with and without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer J Med Screen 11 32 38
13. AR Libstug V Moravan SE Aitken 1998 Results from the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990-1995 J Med Screen 5 73 80
14. DG Kleinbaum M Klein 2002 Logistic regression: a self-learning text 2nd Edition Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. New York 195 198
15. SAS Institute Inc. 1999-2001 SAS System Version 8.02 Cary North Carolina, USA
16. RM Nixon P Pharoah L Tabar UB Krusemo SW Duffy TC Prevost HH Chen 2000 Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 48 325 331
17. PA Carney DL Miglioretti BC Yankaskas K Kerlikowske R Rosenberg CM Rutter BM Geller LA Abraham SH Taplin M Dignan G Cutter R Ballard-Barbash 2003 Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 138 168 175
18. E Ziv J Shepherd R Smith-Bindman K Kerlikowske 2003 Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 95 556 558
19. B Theis N Boyd G Lockwood D Tritchler 1994 Accuracy of family cancer history in breast cancer patients Eur J Cancer Prev 3 321 327
20. ME Parent P Ghadirian A Lacroix C Perret 1995 Accuracy of reports of familial breast cancer in a case-control series Epidemiology 6 184 186
21. H Eerola C Blomqvist E Pukkala S Pyrhonen H Nevanlinna 2000 Familial breast cancer in southern Finland: how prevalent are breast cancer families and can we trust the family history reported by patients? Eur J Cancer 36 1143 1148