The Duality of Media: A Structurational Theory of Public Attention

Communication Theory

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 43-66

  Webster, James G ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; MASS MEDIA; MODELING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 78751476905     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01375.x     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. Adamic, L. A. (2008). The social hyperlink. In J. Turow & L. Tsui (Eds.), The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age (227-249). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Adaomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17, 734-749.
3. Anand, N., & Peterson, R. A. (2000). When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry. Organization Science, 11(3), 270-284.
4. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.
5. Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The future of a radical price. New York: Hyperion.
6. Andrews, K., & Napoli, P. M. (2006). Changing market information regimes: A case study of the transition to the BookScan audience measurement system in the U.S. book publishing industry. Journal of Media Economics, 19(1), 33-54.
7. Ang, I. (1991). Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.
8. Baker, C. E. (2002). Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Barnes, B. E., & Thomson, L. M. (1994). Power to the people (meter): Audience measurement technology and media specialization. In J. S. Ettema & D. C. Whitney (Eds.), Audiencemaking: How the media create the audience (75-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Battelle, J. (2005). The search: How Google and its rivals rewrote the rules of business and transformed our culture. New York: Portfolio.
11. Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals' social position. Organization, 13(5), 653-676.
12. Baum, M. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96, 91-109.
13. Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (2000). Social economics: Market behavior in a social environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731.
16. Boczkowski, P. J., & Peer, L. (2008, May). The choice gap: The softening of news and the divergent preferences of journalists and consumers. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
17. Cantor, J. G. (1994). The role of the audience in the production of culture: A personal research retrospective. In J. Ettema & D. Whitney (Eds.), Audiencemaking: How the media create the audience (159-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Caves, R. E. (2005). Switching channels: Organization and change in TV broadcasting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702-734.
20. Cho, J., & Roy, S. (2004). Impact of search engines on page popularity. Proceedings of the WWW Conference, New York, pp. 20-29.
21. Cooper, R., & Tang, T. (2009). Predicting audience exposure to television in today's media environment: An empirical investigation of active-audience and structural theories. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(3), 400-418.
22. Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (11-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement: Beyond the presumption of attention. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Curtin, M. (2007). Playing to the world's biggest audience: The globalization of Chinese film and TV. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in the new media environment. In W. L. Bennett & R. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (160-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
28. DeVany, A. (2004). Hollywood economics: How extreme uncertainty shapes the film industry. London: Routledge.
29. DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
30. Elberse, A. (2008). Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 88-96.
31. Embirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
32. Entman, R. M., & Wildman, S. W. (1992). Reconciling economic and non-economic perspectives on media policy. Transcending the "marketplace of ideas." Journal of Communication, 42(1), 5-19.
33. Ettema, J. S., & Whitney, D. C. (1994). The money arrow: An introduction to audiencemaking. In J. S. Ettema & D. C. Whitney (Eds.), Audiencemaking: How the media create the audience (1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1-40.
35. Falkinger, J. (2007). Attention economies. Journal of Economic Theory, 133, 226-294.
36. Finkelstein, S. (2008). Google, links, and popularity versus authority. In J. Turow & L. Tsui (Eds.), The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age (104-120). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37. Fraser, N. (1996). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Friemel, T. N. (2008, May). Mass media use in social contexts. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
39. Gans, H. J. (1999). Popular culture & high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste (rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books.
40. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41. Gitlin, T. (1985). Inside prime time. New York: Pantheon.
42. Gitlin, T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In T. Liebes & J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (168-174). London: Routledge.
43. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little Brown.
44. Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday [Online], 2(4), April 7.
45. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
46. Halavais, A. (2008). The hyperlink as organizing principle. In J. Turow & L. Tsui (Eds.), The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age (39-55). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47. Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that's fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Hargittai, E. (2000). Open portals or closed gates? Channeling content on the World Wide Web. Poetics, 27, 233-253.
49. Hargittai, E. (2008a). The digital reproduction of inequality. In D. Grusky (Ed.), Social stratification (936-944). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50. Hargittai, E. (2008b). The role of expertise in navigating links of influence. In J. Turow & L. Tsui (Eds.), The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age (85-103). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
51. Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. (2008, September). Trusting the Web: How young adults evaluate online content. Paper presented at the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, VA.
52. Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., & Kane, J. (2008). Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice, 134, 67-86.
53. Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use: A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31, 369-387.
54. Hayes, T. (2008). Jump point: How network culture is revolutionizing business. New York: McGraw-Hill.
55. Hernandez, R., & Elliot, S. (2004, June 14). Advertising: The odd couple vs. Nielsen. New York Times. Retrieved from
56. Hindman, M. (2006). A mile wide and an inch deep: Measuring media diversity online and offline. In P. Napoli (Ed.), Media diversity and localism: Meaning and metrics (327-347). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. Hollander, B. A. (2008). Tuning out or tuning elsewhere? Partisanship, polarization, and media migration from 1998 to 2006. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(3), 23-40.
59. Horrigan, J., Garrett, K., & Resnick, P. (2004). The Internet and democratic debate. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
60. Huberman, B. A. (2001). The laws of the Web: Patterns in the ecology of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
62. Katz, E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 546, 22-33.
63. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
64. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D. L., & Alter, S. (2005). Impact of popularity indications on reader's selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 296-313.
65. Ksiazek, T. B., & Webster, J. G. (2008). Cultural proximity and audience behavior: The tensions between polarization and multicultural fluency. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 485-503.
66. Lanham, R. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. LaRose, R. (2010). The problem of media habits. Communication Theory, 20, 194-222.
68. Lenhart, A. (2009). Adults and social network websites. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
69. Leonardi, P. M. (2009). Crossing the implementation line: The mutual construction of technology and organizing across development and use activities. Communication Theory, 19, 278-310.
70. Lessing, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin Press.
71. Levy, M. R., & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11, 51-78.
72. Lull, J. (1980). The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 6, 197-209.
73. Lyman, P., & Varian, H. R. (2003). How much information? Retrieved September 14, 2006 from
74. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 415-444.
75. McQuail, D. (1997). Audience analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76. Napoli, P. M. (2003). Audience economics: Media institutions and the audience marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.
77. Napoli, P. M. (2010). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
78. Neuendorf, K., Atkin, D., & Jeffres, L. (2001). Reconceptualizing channel repertoire in the urban cable environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(3), 464-482.
79. Neuman, W. R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 159-176.
80. Nielsen. (2009). Global faces and networked places: A Nielsen report on social networking's new global footprint. New York: Nielsen.
81. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398-427.
82. Owen, B. M., & Wildman, S. S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83. Patterson, T. E. (2000). How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the new audience and weakening democracy. Cambridge, MA: Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics, and Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
84. Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900-907.
85. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision-making. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 5-49.
86. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (2004). Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. In M. E. Whitman & A. B. Woszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of information systems research (206-249). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
87. Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20, 149-171.
88. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89. Resnick, P., & Sami, R. (2007). The influence limiter: Provably manipulation-resistant recommender systems. In ACM conference on recommender systems (25-32). Minneapolis, MN.
90. Rich, M. (2009, April 14). Amazon says error removed listings. New York Times. Retrieved from
91. Rosenstein, A. W., & Grant, A. E. (1997). Reconceptualizing the role of habit: A new model of television audience activity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 324-344.
92. Roth, D. (2009, October 19). The answer factory: Demand media and the fast, disposable, and profitable as hell media model. Wired. Retrieved from
93. Rubin, A. M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 67-77.
94. Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (525-548). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
95. st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3-37.
96. Rust, R. T., Kamakura, W. A., & Alpert, M. I. (1992). Viewer preference segmentation and viewing choice models of network television. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(1), 1-18.
97. Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 854-856.
98. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29.
99. Simon, H. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications and the public interest (40-41). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
100. Simon, H. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Free Press.
101. Straubhaar, J. D. (2003). Choosing national TV: Cultural capital, language, and cultural proximity in Brazil. In M. G. Elasmar (Ed.), The impact of international television: A paradigm shift (77-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
102. Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341-366.
103. Sundar, S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52-72.
104. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
106. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Doubleday.
107. Thorson, E. (2008). Changing patterns of news consumption and participation: News recommendation engines. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 473-489.
108. Turow, J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
109. Turow, J. (2006). Niche envy: Marketing discrimination in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
110. Van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2005) Global village or cyperbalkans: Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Science, 51, 851-868.
111. van Rees, K., & van Eijck, K. (2003). Media repertoires of selective audiences: The impact of status, gender, and age on media use. Poetics, 31, 465-490.
112. Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., & Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14, 388-408.
113. Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 441-458.
114. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of "small-world" networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
115. Weber, L. (2007). Marketing to the social Web: How digital customer communities build your business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
116. Webster, J. G. (2005). Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: Television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 366-382.
117. Webster, J. G. (2006). Audience flow past and present: Television inheritance effects reconsidered. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 323-337.
118. Webster, J. G. (2008a). Structuring a marketplace of attention. In J. Turow & L. Tsui (Eds.), The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age (23-38). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
119. Webster, J. G. (2008b). Developments in audience measurement and research. In B. Calder (Ed.), Kellogg on advertising and media (123-138). New York: Wiley.
120. Webster, J. G. (2009). The role of structure in media choice. In T. Hartmann (Ed.), Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview. London: Routledge.
121. Webster, J. G. (2010). User information regimes: How social media shape patterns of consumption. Northwestern University Law Review, 104, 593-612.
122. Webster, J. G., & Phalen, P. F. (1997). The mass audience: Rediscovering the dominant model. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Webster, J. G., Phalen, P. F., & Lichty, L. W. (2006). Ratings analysis: The theory and practice of audience research (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
124. Yim, J. (2003). Audience concentration in the media: Cross-media comparisons and the introduction of the uncertainty measure. Communication Monographs, 70(2), 114-128.
125. Yuan, E., & Webster, J. G. (2006). Channel repertoires: Using peoplemeter data in Beijing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(3), 524-536.
126. Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20, 109-130.
127. Zillmann, D. (2000). Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory. Communication Yearbook, 23, 103-122.