A mile wide and an inch deep: Measuring media diversity online and offline

Media Diversity and Localism: Meaning and Metrics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 327-347

  Hindman, Matthew ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904776320     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410614407     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Adamic, L., & Glance,N. (2005). The political blogosphere in the 2004U.S. election: Divided they blog. Retrieved February 11, 2005, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/politicalblogs/
2. Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2000). The nature of markets on the World Wide Web. Quarterly Journal of Economic Commerce, 1, 12.
3. Associated Press v. U.S., 326 U.S. 1 (1945)
4. Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-512.
5. Barabasi, A.-L., Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Bianconi,G. (2000).Power lawdistribution of the World Wide Web. Science, 287, 12-13.
6. Barlow, J. P., Birkets, S., Kelly, K., & Slouka, M. (1995). What are we doing online? Harper's, 291, 35-46.
7. Bimber, B. (2003). Notes on the diffusion of the Internet. Retrieved March 31, 2005, from University of California at Santa Barbara Web site: http://www.polsci.ucsb.edu/faculty/bimber/Internet-diffusion.htm
8. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large scale hypertextualWeb search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 107-117.
9. Cederman, L.-E. (2003). Modeling the size of wars: Frombilliard balls to sand piles. American Political Science Review, 97, 135-150.
10. Curtin, M. (2000). Gatekeeping in the neo-network era. In M. Suman & G. Rossman (Eds.), Advocacy groups and the entertainment industry (pp. 65-76). Westport, CT: Praeger.
11. Davis, R. (1998). The web of politics. London: Oxford University Press.
12. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission. (1997). Horizontal merger guidelines. Issued April 2, 1992; revised April 8, 1997. Retrieved October 2, 2004, from http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/horiz_book/hmg1.html
13. Ding, C., He, X., Husbands, P., Zha, H., & Simon, H. (2002). PageRank, HITS, and a unified framework for link analysis (Tech. Rep. No. 49372). Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
14. Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999). On power-law relationships of the internet topology. SIGCOMM, X, 251-262.
15. Gilens, M., & Hertzman, C. (2000). Corporate ownership and news bias: Newspaper coverage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Journal of Politics, 62, 369-386.
16. Gini, C. (1921). Measurement of inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal, 31, 144-126.
17. Guthrie, J. (2004, October 3). Fellow anchors defend Rather on forged papers. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A-2.
18. Hargittai, E. (2003). How wide a Web?: Inequalities in accessing information online. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
19. Hewitt, H. (2005). Blog: Understanding the information reformation that's changing your world. Nashville, TN: Nelson Books.
20. Hindman, M. (2003). 'Googlearchy': How a few heavily linked sites dominate politics online. Unpublished manuscript.
21. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Schlosser, A. E. (2001). The evolution of the digital divide: Examining the relationship of race to Internet access over time. In B. M. Compaine (Ed.), Digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 47-98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Horrigan, J. (2004, April). 55% of adult Internet users have broadband at home or work (Data memo). Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
23. Huberman, B. A. (2001). Laws of the Web. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Huberman, B. A., Pirolli, P. L. T., Pitkow, J. E., & Lukose, R. M. (1998). Strong regularities in world wide web surfing. Science, 280, 95-97.
25. Krugman, P. (1994). Complex landscapes in economic geography. American Economic Review, 84, 412-416.
26. Kumar, R.,Raghavan, P.,Rajagopalan, S., & Tomkins, A. (1999).Trawling the Web for emerging cyber-communities. Computer Networks, 31, 1481-1493.
27. Last, J. V. (2002, March 14). Reading, writing and blogging. Retrieved October 13, 2005, from http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/009flofq.asp
28. Liljeros, F., Edling,C. R., Nunes Amaral, L. A., Stanley, H. E., & Aberg, Y. (2001).Theweb of human sexual contacts. Nature, 411, 907-908.
29. Manjoo, F. (2003, May 21). Can the Web beat big media? Salon. Retrieved June 30, 2003, from http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2003/05/21/web_vs_big_media/
30. Marendy, P. (2001). A review of WorldWideWeb searching techniques, focusing on HITS and related algorithms that utilise the link topology of theWorldWideWeb to provide the basis for a structure based search technology (technical report). North Queensland, Australia: James Cook University.
31. Margolis, M., & Resnick,D. (2000). Politics as usual:The cyberspace 'revolution.'NewYork: Sage.
32. Noam, E. (2004, September 7). Howto measure media concentration. Financial Times [online]. Retrieved October 13, 2005, from www.ft.com
33. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1995). Falling through the 'net: A study of the "have nots" in rural and urban America. Washington, DC: Author.
34. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1998). Falling through the 'net II: New data on the digital divide. Washington, DC: Author.
35. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: Author.
36. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide. New York: Cambridge.
37. Pareto, V. (1971). Manual of political economy. (A. S. Schweir, Trans.; A. S. Schweir & A. N. Page, Eds.). New York: A. M. Kelley.
38. Pennock, D. M., Flake, G.W., Lawrence, S., Glover, E. J., & Giles, C. L. (2002).Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the Web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 5207-5211.
39. Ranie, L. (2005).The state of blogging (Data memo).Washington,DC: PewInternet and American Life Project.
40. Shirky, C. (2004, January 24). Inequality in the weblog world (Seminar presentation). Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
41. Starr, P. (2004). The creation of the American media: The political origins of modern communications. New York: Basic Books.
42. Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Yeager, H. (2004, September 24). Blogs bias and 24-hour news: How a fragmented media are shaping the US election. The Financial Times, p. 17.
44. Yim, J. (2003). Audience concentration in the media: Cross-media comparisons and the introduction of the uncertainty measure. Communications Monographs, 70, 114-128.