A history of perimetry and visual field testing

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Johnson, Chris A ^a   Wall, Michael ^a,b   Thompson, H Stanley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

glaucoma; history; perimetry; Visual field; visual function

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; FIELD OF VIEWS; GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; SMALL TARGETS; STATISTICAL EVALUATION; TEST PROCEDURES; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL FUNCTIONS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL SYSTEMS;

OPHTHALMOLOGY; TESTING;

VISION;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; HISTORY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PERIMETRY; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD;

AUTOMATION; HISTORY, 17TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, ANCIENT; HUMANS; VISION TESTS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 78651510974     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182004c3b     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. MacLeod RB. William James: Unfinished Business. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1969.
2. Thompson HS, Wall M. Imaging and Perimetry Society (IPS). A History of Perimetry. Available at: http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/ips/PerimetryHistory. Accessed October 4, 2010.
3. Lascaratos J, Marketos S. A historical outline of Greek ophthalmology irom the Hellenistic period up to the establishment oithe iirst universities. Doc Ophthalmol 1988;68:157-69.
4. Thompson HS. How visual field testing was introduced into office ophthalmology. Paper presented at the 1993 David G. Cogan Ophthalmic Historical Society Meeting, 1993.
5. von Graefe A. Ueber die Untersuchung des Gesichtsfeldes bei amblyopischen Affectionen. Graefes Archiv fur Ophthalmologie 1856;2(Pt 2):258-98.
6. Traquair HM. An Introduction to Clinical Perimetry. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1927.
7. Aulhorn E, Harms H. Visual perimetry. In: Jameson D, Hurvich LM, eds. Handbook of Sensory Physiology: Volume VII/4: Visual Psychophysics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1972:102-45.
8. Tate GW, Lynn JR. Principles of Quantitative Perimetry: Testing and Interpreting the Visual Field. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1977.
9. Bebie H, Fankhauser F, Spahr J. Static perimetry: strategies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1976;54:325-38.
10. Bebie H, Fankhauser F, Spahr J. Static perimetry: accuracy and fluctuations. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1976;54:339-48.
11. Fankhauser F, Spahr J, Bebie H. Three years of experience with the 'Octopus' automatic perimeter. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1977;14:7-15.
12. Fankhauser F. Developmental milestones of automated perimetry. In: Hendkind P, ed. ACTA: XXIV International Congress of Ophthalmology. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1982:147-50.
13. Heijl A, Patella VM. Essential Perimetry. The Field Analyzer Primer (3rd ed), Dublin California: Carl Zeiss Meditec, 2002.
14. Anderson DR. Perimetry with and without Automation, 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1987.
15. Johnson CA, Keltner JL. Principles and techniques of the examination of the visual sensory system. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, eds. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1998:153-235.
16. Wall M, Johnson CA. Principles and techniques of the examination of the visual sensory system. In: Miller NR, Walsh FB, Hoyt WF, eds. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology, vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2005:83-149.
17. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Automated perimetry I. A consumer's guide. Ann Ophthalmol 1981;13:275-9.
18. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Automated perimetry. II. Devices manufactured in the United States and abroad. Ann Ophthalmol 1981;13:395-7.
19. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Comparative material on automated and semi-automated perimeters. Ophthalmology 1981;88(suppl):67-9.
20. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters - 1982. Ophthalmology 1982;89(suppl):65-80.
21. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters - 1983. Ophthalmology 1983;90(suppl):1-35.
22. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Automated and manual perimetry-a six-year overview. Special emphasis on neuro-ophthalmic problems. Ophthalmology 1984;91:68-85.
23. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters - 1984. Ophthalmology 1984;91(suppl):25-50.
24. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Automated perimetry. American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendation. Ophthalmology 1984; 91(suppl):51-7.
25. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Comparative material on automated and semi-automated perimeters - 1985. Ophthalmology 1985;92(suppl):34-57.
26. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters - 1986. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1-25.
27. Johnson CA, Sample PA. Perimetry and visual field testing. In: Alm A, Kaufmann P, eds. Adler's Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Approach, 10th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002:552-77.
28. Wall M, Ketoff KM. Random dot motion perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1995,120:587-596.
29. Frisen L. High-pass resolution perimetry. A clinical review. Doc Ophthalmol 1993;83:1-25. Review. (Pubitemid 23179167)
30. Ariyasu RG, Lee PP, Linton KP, LaBree LD, Azen SP, Siu AL. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of screening tests for eye conditions in a clinic-based population [see comments]. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1751-60.
31. Nguyen DT, Fahimi A, Fink W, Nazemi PP, Kim JK, Sadun AA. Novel 3D computer-automated threshold Amsler grid visual field testing of scotomas in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:776-82.
32. Hart WM Jr, Hartz RK, Hagen RW, Clark KW. Color contrast perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984;25:400-13.
33. Demirel S, Johnson CA. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice. J Am Optom Assoc 1996;67:451-6.
34. Johnson CA. Diagnostic value of short-wavelength automated perimetry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1996;7:54-8.
35. Sample PA. Short-wavelength automated perimetry: it's role in the clinic and for understanding ganglion cell function. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000;19:369-83.
36. Racette L, Sample PA. Short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003;16:227-36, vi-vii.
37. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003;22:201-51.
38. Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1173-80.
39. Chan HH. Detection of glaucomatous damage using multifocal ERG. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:410-4.
40. Hood DC. Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000;19:607-46.
41. Kardon RH. Pupil perimetry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1992;3:565-70.
42. Chen Y, Wyatt HJ, Swanson WH, Dul MW. Rapid pupil-based assessment of glaucomatous damage. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85: 471-81.
43. Asakawa K, Shoji N, Ishikawa H, Shimizu K. New approach for the glaucoma detection with pupil perimetry. Clin Ophthalmol 2010;4: 617-23.
44. Frisén L. New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing. Vision Res 2002;42:1931-9.
45. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Parisi L, Zeppieri M. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:180-4.
46. Gloor BP. Franz Fankhauser: the father of the automated perimeter. Surv Ophthalmol 2009;54:417-25.