The nature of information science: Changing models

Information Research

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Robinson, Lyn ^a   Karamuftuoglu, Murat ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651446245     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
2. Barwise, J. & Seligman, J. (1997). Information flow: the logic of distributed systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science 44).
3. Bates, M.J. (2006). Fundamental forms of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 57(8), 1033-1045
4. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5tWY3WqL5)
5. Bawden, D. (2008). Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants: the developing foundations of information science. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 415-426
6. Bawden, D. (2007). organized complexity, meaning and understanding: an approach to a unified view of information for information science. Aslib Proceedings, 59(4/5), 307-327
7. Boolos, G.S., Burgess, J.P. & Jeffrey, R.C. (2007). Computability and logic. (5th edition) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8. Buckland, M.K. (1997) What is a 'document'?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9), 804-809
9. Capurro, R. & Hjörland, B., (2003), The concept of information. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 37, 343-411.
10. Devlin, K. (1991). Logic and information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5tWYQHtVc)
12. Duff, A.S. (1997). Some post-war models of the information chain. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 29(4), 179-187
13. Farradane, J.E.L. (1955). Professional education of the information scientist. In Congrès international des bibliothèques et des centres de documentation, Brussels, September 1955. Volume 2B, (pp. 76-81). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
14. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5tWcVGLnQ)
15. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5tWcaw5Jr)
16. Frohmann, B. (2009). Revisiting 'what is a document?' Journal of Documentation, 65(2), 291-303.
17. Hartel J. (2003). The serious leisure frontier in library and information science: hobby domains. Knowledge organization, 30(3/4), 228-238.
18. Hawkins, D.T. (2001), Information Science Abstracts: tracking the literature of information science. Part 1: definition and map. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 44-53.
19. Heilprin, L.B. (1989). Foundations of information science re-examined. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 23, 343-372
20. Hjørland, B. (2007). Information: objective or subjective/situational? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 1448-1456
21. Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422-462
22. Hjørland, B. & Albrechtsen H. (1995). Towards a new horizon in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425.
23. Hjørland, B. & Hartel, J. (2003). Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains. Knowledge organization, 25(4), 162-201.
24. Karamuftuoglu M. (2009). Situating logic and information in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(10), 2019-2031.
25. Karamuftuoglu M. (2007). Need for a systemic theory of classification in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(13), 1977-1987.
26. Karamuftuoglu, M., (2006). Information arts and information science: time to unite? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1780-1793
27. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5tWdaMAWv)
28. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Meadows, A.J. (1991). Introduction to knowledge and communication: essays on the information chain, London: Bingley
30. Peirce, C.S. (1958). Collected papers, Vols. 1-8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Robinson, L. (2009). Information science: communication chain and domain analysis. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 578-591
32. Shapiro, F.R. (1995). Coinage of the term 'Information Science'. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(5), 384-385
33. Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communications. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
34. Summers, R., Oppenheim, C., Meadows, J., McKnight, C. & Kinnell, M., (1999), Information science in 2010: a Loughborough University view. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1153-1162
35. Sundin, O., (2003), Towards an understanding of symbolic aspects of professional information: an analysis of the nursing domain. Knowledge organization, 30(3/4), 170-181
36. Tennis, J.T. (2003). Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge organization, 30(3/4), 191-195
37. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5tWfGc1aw)
38. van Rijsbergen, C.J. and Lalmas M., (1996), Information Calculus for Information Retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(5), 385-398.
39. Vickery, B.C. (2009), Meeting the challenge (guest editorial). In A. Gilchrist, (Ed.). Information science in transition, (pp. xxi-xxix). London: Facet Publishing.
40. Webber, S. (2003). Information science in 2003: a critique. Journal of Information Science, 29(4), 311-330
41. Zins, C. (2007). Conceptions of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(3), 335-350