Information Science Abstracts: Tracking the literature of information science. Part 1: definition and map

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 44-53

  Hawkins, Donald T ^a  

^a Information Today Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; INTERNET; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE ABSTRACTS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 0035120850     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<44::AID-ASI1057>3.0.CO;2-6     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bates, M.J. (1998). Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1185-1205.
2. Bates, M.J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1043-1050.
3. Bohnert, L.M. (1989). Information science: What is it? . . . Why not try information retrieval again? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 15(7), 18.
4. Buckland, M. (1999). The landscape of information science: The American Society for Information Science at 62. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 970-974.
5. Diener, R.A.V. (1989). Information science: What is it? . . . What should it be? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 15(5), 17.
6. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: An author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science, 25, 67-78.
7. Farradane, J. (1980). Information science? Journal of Information Science 2, 313-314.
8. Giuliano, V.E. (1969). The relationship of information science to librarianship - Problems and scientific training. American Documentation 20, 344-345.
9. Harmon, G. (1971). On the evolution of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 21, 235-241.
10. Hawkins, D.T. (1987). The commodity nature of information, ONLINE 11(1), 67-70.
11. Hoshovsky, A.G., & Massey, R.J. (1968). Information science: Its ends, means, and opportunities. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting, 5, 47-55.
12. Jacsó, Péter (1997). Databases: Péter's picks & pans. Database 20(1), 84-87.
13. Klempner, I.M. (1969). Information science unlimited? . . . A position paper. American Documentation 20, 339-343.
14. Lipetz, B.-A. (1993). ASI's "other" journal: Information science abstracts. Key Words 1(7), 13-14.
15. Lucky, R.W. (1989). Silicon dreams. New York: St. Martin's Press.
16. Machlup, F., & Mansfield, U. (Eds.). (1983). The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. McCain, K.W. (1995). R&D themes in information science: A preliminary co-descriptor analysis. In M.E.D. Koenig (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the international society for scientometrics and infometrics (pp. 275-282). Medford, NJ: Learned Information, Inc.
18. McCain, K.W. (1998). Private communication.
19. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R.E. (1999). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: Cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information Processing and Management, 35, 45-76.
20. Milstead, J.L. (1998). ASIS thesaurus of information science and librarianship, 2nd ed. ASIS, 1998. (Published for ASIS by Information Today, Inc., Medford, NJ.)
21. Morris, T.A., & McCain, K.W. (1998). The structure of the Medical Informatics Journal literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, 448-466.
22. Rayward, W.B. (1996). The history and historiography of information science: Some reflections. Information Processing and Management 32, 3-17. [Reprinted in 1998 in Historical Studies in Information Science (pp. 7-21), T.B. Hahn & M. Buckland, Michael (Eds.), Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.]
23. Rayward, W.B. (1996). The history and historiography of information science: Some reflections. Information Processing and Management 32, 3-17. [Reprinted in 1998 in Historical Studies in Information Science (pp. 7-21), T.B. Hahn & M. Buckland, Michael (Eds.), Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.]
24. Rice, R.E. (1990). Hierarchies and clusters among communication and library and information science journals, 1977-1987. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 138-153). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Saracevic, T. (1997). Users lost: Reflections on the past, future, and limits of information science. SIGIR Forum, 31(2), 16-27.
26. Saracevic, T. (1999). Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1051-1063.
27. Small, H. (1981). The relationship of information science to the social sciences: A co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management 17, 39-50.
28. Summers, R., Oppenheim, C., Meadows, J., McKnight, C., & Kinnell, M. Information science in 2010: A Loughborough University view. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1153-1162.
29. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citaiton analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49, 327-355.
30. Williams, M.E. (1987-88). Defining information science and the role of ASIS. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 14(2), 17-19.
31. Yerkey, N., & Glogowski, M. (1990). Scatter of library and information science topics among bibliographic databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41, 245-253.