Categorization of activities of daily living of lower limb amputees during short-term use of a portable kinetic recording system: A preliminary study

Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 2-11

  Frossard, Laurent ^a,b   Stevenson, Nathan ^b,c   Sullivan, John ^d   Uden, Maggie ^d   Pearcy, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^d QUEEN MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

activities of daily living; classification; load sensor; lower limb amputation; outcome assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651436762     PISSN: 10408800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0b013e318207914c     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, et al. The Amputee Mobility Predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lowerlimb amputee's ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:613-627.
2. Miller L, McCay JA. Summary and conclusions from the academy's sixth state-of-the-science conference on lower limb prosthetic outcome measures. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:2-7.
3. Condie E, Scott H, Treweek S. Lower limb prosthetic outcome measures: a review of the literature 1995 to 2005. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:13-45.
4. Parker K, Kirby RL, Adderson J, Thompson K. Ambulation of people with lower-limb amputations: relationship between capacity and performance measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91:543-549.
5. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé M-C. Tools to measure outcome of people with a lower limb amputation: update on the PPA and LCI. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:61-67.
6. Boone DA, Coleman KL. Use of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:68-79.
7. Hagberg K, Brånemark R, Hagg O. Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA): initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41:695-706.
8. Ryall N, Eyres S, Neumann V, et al. The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population-specific measure for lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:833-844.
9. Gailey RS. Predictive outcome measures versus functional outcome measures in the lower limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:51-60.
10. Stepien JM, Cavenett S, Taylor L, Crotty M. Activity levels among lower-limb amputees: self-report versus Step Activity Monitor. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:896-900.
11. Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M. Lower extremity prosthetic mobility: a comparison of 3 self-report scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1432-1440.
12. Day HJB. The assessment and description of amputee activity. Prosthet Orthot Int 1981;5:23-28.
13. Boone DA, Coleman KL. Use of a Step Activity Monitor in determining outcomes. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:86-92.
14. Ramstrand N, Nilsson K-Ã. Validation of a patient activity monitor to quantify ambulatory activity in an amputee population. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:157-166.
15. Coleman KL, Smith DG, Boone DA, et al. Step activity monitor: long-term continuous recording of ambulatory function. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:8-18.
16. Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, et al. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 2001;34:873-881.
17. Tryon WW. Measuring activity using actometers: a methodological study. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 1984;6:147-153.
18. Jafari R, Li W, Bajcsy R, et al. Physical activity monitoring for assisted living at home. In: Leonhard S, ed. 4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks; Aachen, Germany: Springer; 2007:213-219.
19. Frossard L, Stevenson N, Smeathers J, et al. Monitoring of the load regime applied on the osseointegrated fixation of a transfemoral amputee: a tool for evidence-based practice. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008;32:68-78.
20. Oshima Y, Kawaguchi K, Tanaka S, et al. Classifying household and locomotive activities using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture 2010;31:370-374.
21. Zahedi MS, Spence WD, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. Repeatability of kinetic measurements in gait studies of the lower limb amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int 1987;11:55-64.
22. Lee W, Frossard L, Hagberg K, et al. Kinetics analysis of transfemoral amputees fitted with osseointegrated fixation performing common activities of daily living. Clin Biomech 2007;22: 665-673.
23. Lee WC, Frossard LA, Hagberg K, et al. Magnitude and variability of loading on the osseointegrated implant of transfemoral amputees during walking. Med Eng Phys 2008;30:825-833.
24. Brånemark R, Brånemark P-I, Rydevik B, Myers R. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38:175-181.
25. Sullivan J, Uden M, Robinson K, Sooriakumaran S. Rehabilitation of the trans-femoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis: the United Kingdom experience. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27:114-120.
26. Hagberg K. Chapter 25: Physiotherapy for patients having a trans-femoral amputation. In: Brånemark P-I, editor. The Osseointegration Book-from Calvarium to Calcaneus. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlag-GmbH; 2005:477-487.
27. Pitkin M. On the way to total integration of prosthetic pylon with residuum. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46:345-360.
28. Frossard L, Beck J, Dillon M, et al. Development and preliminary testing of a device for the direct measurement of forces and moments in the prosthetic limb of transfemoral amputees during activities of daily living. J Prosthet Orthot 2003;15:135-142.
29. Frossard L, Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Branemark R. Load-relief of walking aids on osseointegrated fixation: instrument for evidencebased practice. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009;17:9-14.
30. Dumas R, Cheze L, Frossard L. Loading applied on prosthetic knee of transfemoral amputee: comparison of inverse dynamics and direct measurements. Gait Posture 2009;30:560-562.
31. Seliktar R, Yekutiel M, Bar A. Gait consistency test based on the impulse-momentum theorem. Prosthet Orthot Int 1979;3:91-98.
32. Frossard L, Gow DL, Hagberg K, et al. Apparatus for monitoring load bearing rehabilitation exercises of a transfemoral amputee fitted with an osseointegrated fixation: a proof-of-concept study. Gait Posture 2010;31:223-228.
33. Frossard LP, Hagberg KP, Haggstrom ECPO, et al. Functional outcome of transfemoral amputees fitted with an osseointegrated fixation: temporal gait characteristics. J Prosthet Orthot 2010;22:11-20.
34. Skinner H, Efferney D. Special review "Gait analysis in amputees." Am J Phys Med 1985;2:82-89.
35. Murray MP, Mollinger LA, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Gait patterns in above-knee amputee patients: hydraulic swing control vs constant-friction knee components. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:339-345.
36. Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardener G, Mollinger L. Gait patterns of above-knee amputees using constant friction knee components. Bull Prosthet Res 1980;17:35-45.
37. DiAngelo DJ, Winter DA, Ghista DN, Newcombe WR. Performance assessment of the Terry Fox jogging prosthesis for aboveknee amputees. J Biomech 1989;22:543-548.
38. Stephenson P, Seedhom BB. Estimation of forces at the interface between an artificial limb and an implant directly fixed into the femur in above-knee amputees. J Orthop Sci 2002;7: 192-297.
39. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:932-938.