Tools to measure outcome of people with a lower limb amputation: Update on the PPA and LCI

Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

Volumn 18, Issue 6 PROCEEDINGS, 2006, Pages

  Gauthier Gagnon, Christiane ^a   Grisé, Marie Claude ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

amputation; artificial limbs; lower extremity; outcome assessment; psychometrics; rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547510855     PISSN: 10408800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008526-200601001-00007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Breakey JW. Body image: the lower-limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 1997;9:58-66.
2. Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EV, et al. The Amputee Mobility Predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:613-627.
3. Callaghan BG, Sockalingam S, Treweek SP, Condie E. A post-discharge functional outcome measure for lower limb amputees: test-retest reliability with trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002;26:113-119.
4. Grisé MCL, Gauthier-Gagnon C, Martineau GG. Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:862-870.
5. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC. The Locomotor Capabilities Index: content validity. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1998;2:40-46.
6. Hart DL. Orthotics and Prosthetics national office Outcomes Tool (OPOT): initial reliability and validity assessment for lower extremity prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot 1999;11:101-111.
7. O'Reily C. Orthotics and prosthetics users' survey (OPUS) ready for nation-wide testing in 2001. Capabilities January 2001; pp 5-9.
8. O'Reilly P. OPUS: orthotics and prosthetics users' survey out-come measures of O & P services. Capabilities Autumn 2002; pp 5-13.
9. O'Reilly P, Heinemann AW, Body RK. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Capabilities Summer 2003; pp 4-8.
10. Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, Del Águila M. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:931-939.
11. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1309-3914.
12. Hagberg K, Branemark R, Hagg O. Questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA): initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41:695-706.
13. Bilodeau S, Hébert R, Desrosiers J. Questionnaire sur la satisfaction des personnes amputées du membre inférieur face à leur prothèse: développement et validation. Occup Ther 1998;66: 23-31.
14. Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Positive meaning in amputation and thoughts about the amputated limb. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000;24:196-204.
15. Green LW, Kreuter MW, Deeds SG, Partridge KB. Health Education Planning, a Diagnostic Approach. Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing; 1980.
16. World Health Organization. ICIDH: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: WHO: 1980.
17. World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
18. Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys, the Total Design Method. New York: Wiley and Sons; 1978.
19. Del Greco L, Walop W, Eastridge L. Questionnaire development: III: translation. Can Med Assoc J 1987;136:699-700.
20. th World Congress. Hong Kong, China, August 1-6, 2004.
21. Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, et al. Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:583-590.
22. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC. Predisposing factors related to prosthetic use by people with a transtibial and transfemoral amputation. J Prosthet Orthot 1998;10:99-109.
23. Streppel KRM, De Vries J, Van Harten WH. Functional status and prosthesis use in amputees, measured with the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee (PPA) and the short version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68). M J Rehabil Res 2001;24:251-256.
24. Franchignoni F, Orlandini D, Ferriero G, Moscato TA. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Locomotor Capabilities Index in adults with lower-limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:743-748.
25. th World Congress, Hong Kong, China, August 1-6, 2004.
26. th World Congress, Hong Kong, China, August 1 to 6, 2004.
27. Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M. Lower extremity prosthetic mobility: a comparison of 3 self-report scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1432-1440.
28. Panesar BS, Morrison P, Hunter J. A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:157-171.
29. Treweek SP, Condie ME. Three measures of functional outcome for lower limb amputees: a retrospective review. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998;22:178-185.
30. Rushton PW, Miller WC. Goal attainment scaling in the rehabilitation of patients with lower-extremity amputations: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:771-775.
31. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC, Potvin D. Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80: 706-713.