Kinetics of transfemoral amputees with osseointegrated fixation performing common activities of daily living

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 665-673

  Lee, Winson C C ^a   Frossard, Laurent A ^a   Hagberg, Kerstin ^b   Haggstrom, Eva ^b   Brånemark, Rickard ^b   Evans, John H ^a   Pearcy, Mark J ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Osseointegration; Prosthetics; Transducer; Transfemoral amputation

Indexed keywords

BONE; GAIT ANALYSIS; JOINT PROSTHESES; KINETICS; OPTIMIZATION; PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTATION;

BIOMECHANICS;

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MUSCLE FATIGUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; ROTATION; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 34249315391     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berme N., Lawes P., Solomonidis S., and Paul J.P. A shorter pylon transducer for measurement of prosthetic forces and moments during amputee gait. Engineering in Medicine 4 (1975) 6-8
2. Branemark R., Branemark P.I., Rydevik B., and Myers R. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 38 (2001) 175-181
3. DiAngelo D.J., Winter D.A., Ghista D.N., and Newcombe W.R. Performance assessment of the Terry Fox jogging prosthesis for above-knee amputees. Journal of Biomechanics 22 (1989) 543-548
4. Frossard, L., Beck, J., Dillon, M., Evans, J., 2001. Comparison between the forces and moments applied on the residium of above-knee amputees during daily life activities and walking. In: Proceedings of Xth International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics World Congress. Glasgow, Scottland.
5. Frossard L., Beck J., Dillon M., Chappell M., and Evans J.H. Development and preliminary testing of a device for the direct measurement of forces and moments in the prosthetic limb of transfemoral amputees during activities of daily living. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 15 (2003) 135-142
6. Gallagher P., Allen D., and MacLachlan M.I. Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain following lower limb amputation: a descriptive analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation 26 (2001) 522-530
7. Hagberg K., and Branemark R. Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 25 (2001) 186-194
8. Hagberg K., Haggstrom E., Uden M., and Branemark R. Socket versus bone-anchored trans-femoral prostheses: hip range of motion and sitting comfort. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 25 (2005) 186-194
9. Jaegers S.M.H.J., Arendzen J.H., and de Jongh H.J. Prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: a kinematic study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 76 (1995) 736-743
10. James U., and Oberg K. Prosthetic gait pattern in unilateral above-knee amputees. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 5 (1973) 35-50
11. Mak A., Zhang M., and Boone D. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 28 (2001) 161-174
12. Murray M.P., Mollinger L.A., Sepic S.B., and Gardner G.M. Gait patterns in above-knee amputee patients: hydraulic swing control vs constant-friction knee components. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 64 (1983) 339-345
13. Nietert M., Englisch N., Kreil P., and Alba-Lopez G. Loads in hip disarticulation prostheses during normal daily use. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 22 (1998) 199-215
14. Perry J. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function (1992), Slack, Thorofare, NJ
15. Robinson K.P., Branemark R., and Ward D. Future developments: osseointegration in transfemoral amputees. In: Smith D.G., Michael J.w., and Bowker J.H. (Eds). Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies: Surgical, Prosthetic and Rehabilitation Principles (2004), America Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
16. Schmalz T., Blumentritt S., and Marx B. Biomechanical analysis of stair ambulation in lower limb amputees. Gait & Posture 25 (2007) 267-278
17. Stephenson P., and Seedhom B.B. Estimation of forces at the interface between an artificial limb and an implant directly fixed into the femur in above-knee amputees. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 7 (2002) 192-297
18. Sullivan J., Uden M., Robinson K., and Sooriakumaran S. Rehabilitation of the trans-femoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis: the United Kingdom experience. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 27 (2003) 114-120
19. Wearing S.c., Urry S.r., and Smeathers J.E. Ground reaction forces at discrete sites of the foot derived from pressure plate measurements. Foot & Ankle International 22 (2001) 653-661
20. Zahedi M.S., Spence W.D., Solomonidis S.E., and Paul J.P. Repeatability of kinetic measurements in gait studies in gait studies of the lower limb amputee. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 11 (1987) 55-64