Is developmental education helping community college students persist? a critical review of the literature

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 173-184

  Melguizo, Tatiana ^a   Bos, Johannes ^b,c   Prather, George ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Berkeley Planning Associates   (United States)

^c AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

^d Los Angeles Community College District   (United States)

Author keywords

basic skills; community colleges; evaluation; remedial math

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651432562     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764210381873     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Abou-Sayf, F. (2008). Does the elimination of prerequisites affect enrollment and success? Community College Review, 36, 47-62.
2. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment (Monograph). Washington, DC: Office of Education Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
3. Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 886-924.
4. Baxter, J., & Smith, S. (1998). Subsequent grades assessment of pedagogies in remedial mathematics. Primus, 8, 276-288.
5. Bettinger, E.P., & Long, B.T. (2004). Shape up or ship out: The effects of remediation on students at four-year colleges (NBER Working Paper 10369). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6. Bettinger, E.P., & Long, B.T. (2005). Remediation at the community college: Student participation and outcomes. New Directions for Community Colleges, 129, 17-26.
7. Bloom, H.S., Michalopoulos, C., & Hill, C.J. (2005). Using experiments to assess nonexperimental comparison-group methods for measuring program effects. In H. S. Bloom (Ed.), Learning more from social experiments (pp. 173-235). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Boylan, H.R. (2002). What works: Research-based best practices in developmental education. Boone, NC: National Center for Developmental Education.
9. Boylan, H., Bliss, L., & Bonham, D. (1994). Characteristics components of developmental programs. Review of Research in Developmental Education, 11(1), 1-4.
10. Boylan, H., Bliss, L., & Bonham, D. (1997). Program components and their relationship to students' performance. Journal of Developmental Education, 20(3), 1-8.
11. Boylan, H., & Saxon, D. (1999). What works in remediation: Lessons from 30 years of research. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncde.appstate.edu/reserve_reading/what_works.htm.
12. Breneman, D.W., & Haarlow, W.N. (1998). Remedial education: Costs and consequences. Remediation in higher education. In Fordham report: Volume 2(9). Remediation in higher education: A symposium (pp. 1-50). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
13. Calcagno, J.C. (2007). Evaluating the impact of developmental education in community colleges: A quasi-experimental regression-discontinuity design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
14. Calcagno, J.C., & Long, B.T. (2008). The impact of remediation using a regression discontinuity approach: Addressing endogenous sorting and noncompliance (NBER Working Paper 14194). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15. California Legislative Analyst Office. (2008). From back to basics: Improving college readiness of community college students. Retrieved on fromhttp://www.cos.edu/eli/files/ccc_readiness_0608.pdf.
16. Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally.
17. Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
18. Dehejia, R.H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in non-experimental studies: Re-evaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1053-1062.
19. Dehejia, R.H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151-161.
20. Doyle, W. (2009). Impact of increased academic intensity on transfer rates: An application of matching estimators to student-unit record data. Research in Higher Education, 50, 52-72.
21. Heckman, J.J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
22. Heckman, J., LaLonde, R., & Smith, J. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 1865-2097). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
23. Illowsky, B. (2008). The California Basic Skills Initiative. New Directions for Community Colleges, 144, 83-91.
24. James, J., Morrow, V.P., & Perry, P. (2002). Study session on basic skills. Sacramento, CA: Board of Governors California Community Colleges.
25. Jepsen, C. (2006, April). Basic skills in California's community colleges: Evidence from staff and self referrals. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA.
26. Lavin, D., Alba, R., & Silberstein, R. (1981). Right versus privilege: The open admissions experiment at City University of New York. New York: Free Press.
27. Lazarick, L. (1997). Back to the basics: Remedial education. Community College Journal, 68(2), 10-15.
28. Lesik, S.A. (2006). Applying the regression discontinuity design to infer causality with non-random assignment. Review of Higher Education, 30, 1-19.
29. Lipsey, M.W., & Garrard, W.M. (2007, June). Evaluating a school-level statewide conflict resolution education program for middle schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.
30. Martorell, P., & McFarlin, I. (2007). Help or hindrance? The effect of remediation on academic and labor market outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
31. Melguizo, T., Hagedorn, L.S., & Cypers, S. (2008). The need for remedial/developmental education and the cost of community college transfer: Calculations from a sample of California community college transfers. Review of Higher Education, 31, 401-431.
32. Merisotis, J.P., & Phipps, R.A. (2000). Remedial education in colleges and universities: What's going on? Review of Higher Education, 24, 67-85.
33. O'Connor, W., & Morrison, T. (1997). Do remedial mathematics programmes improve students' mathematical ability? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 201-207.
34. O'Hear, M.F., & MacDonald, R.B. (1995). A critical review of research in developmental education: Part I. Journal of Developmental Education, 19(2), 2-6.
35. O'Hear, M.F., & MacDonald, R.B. (1996). A critical review of research in developmental education: Part II. Journal of Developmental Education, 19(1), 8-10.
36. Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2003). Remedial education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in fall 2000 (NCES Publication No. 2004-010). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
37. Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges. (2005). Environmental scan: A summary of key issues facing California community colleges pertinent to the strategic process. Retrieved fromhttp://ftp.rpgroup.org/documents/projects/CCC-StrategicPlan/EvScanCCC-StrategicPln-RPCSS-07-05.pdf.
38. Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
39. Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
40. Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W., & Shavelson, R. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs (Governing Board of the American Educational Research Association Grants Program White paper). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
41. Schochet, P.A. (2006). Regression discontinuity design case study: National evaluation of early reading first. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
42. Spann, M.G. (2000). Remediation: A must for the 21st century learning society (Policy paper). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
43. Waycaster, P. (2001). Factors impacting success in community college developmental mathematics courses and subsequent courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 406-416.
44. Winship, C., & Morgan, L.M. (1999). The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 659-707.
45. Wirt, J., Choy, S., Gerald, D., Provasnik, S., Rooney, P., Watanabe, S.,. . & Glander, M. (2001). The condition of education 2001 (NCES Publication No. NCES 2001-072). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, United States Department of Education.