The evaluation of selected attachment systems for implant-retained overdenture based on retention characteristics analysis

Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 75-83

  Chladek, Grzegorz ^a   Wrzuś Wieliński, Marcin ^b  

^a SILESIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b Private practice   (Poland)

Author keywords

Attachment; Denture; Force; Implant; Mechanical characteristic; Overdenture; Retention; Work

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTURE; EQUIPMENT; FRICTION; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FRICTION; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 78651399978     PISSN: 1509409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bredent - products for the dental-technical laboratory, 2005.
2. Chladek W., Chladek G., Lipski T., Margielewicz J., Zmudzki J., Biomechanical problems related to design of implantological overdenture stabilization system (in Polish), Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śla{ogonek}skiej, Gliwice, 2008.
3. ® system, Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 1992, 3, 104-111.
4. Macentee M.I., Walton J.N., Glick N., A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: Three-year results, J. Prosthet. Dent., 2005, 93, 28-37.
5. Walton J.N., Huizinga S.C., Peck C.C., Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience, Int. J. Pros-thodont, 2001, 14, 523-530.
6. Naert E., Hooghe M., Quirynen M., Van Steenberghe D., The reliability of implant-retained hinging overdentures for the fully edentulous mandible. An up to 9-year longitudinal study, Clin. Oral Invest., 1997, 1, 119-124.
7. Watson G.K., Payne A.G., Purton D.G., Thomson W.M., Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service, Int. J. Prosthodont, 2002, 15, 259-266.
8. Behr M., Lang R., Leibrook A., Rosentritt M., Handel G., Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and MZ dental implants, Clin. Oral. Impl. Res., 1998, 9, 51-8.
9. Chladek W., Hadasik E., Chladek G., Influence of surface modification on friction coefficient of the titanium-elastomer couple, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2007, Vol. 9, No. 2.
10. Chladek G., Durability evaluation of a friction couple intended for implantological stabilization of complete dentures, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2008, Vol. 10, No. 3.
11. Chladek G., Influence of tribological wear on the effectiveness of the new type implantological attachment (in Polish), Inżynieria Materiałowa, styczen-luty 2009, Nr 1 (167).
12. Breeding L., Dixon D., Schmitt S., The effect of simulated function on the retention of bar-clip retained removable prostheses, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996 May, 75(5), 570-573.
13. Chladek G., Krawczyk C., Investigation of viscoelasticity of silicone rubber samples (in Polish), Nowoczesny Technik Dentystyczny - wydanie specjalne, Katowice, 2007.
14. Walton J.N., Ruse N.D., In vitro changes in clips and bars used to retain implant overdentures, J Prosthet. Dent., 1995 Nov, 74(5), 482.
15. Wolf K., Ludwig K., Hartfil H., Kern M., Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments, Quintessence Int., 2009 May, 40(5), 405-412.
16. van Kampen F., Cune M., van der Bilt A., Bosman F., Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overden-ture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function, Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2003 Dec, 14(6), 720- 726.
17. Sadig W., A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures, Quintessence Int., 2009 Apr, 40(4), 313-319.
18. Besimo C.E., Guarneri A., In vitro retention force changes of prefabricated attachments for overdentures, J. Oral. Reha-bil., 2003 Jul, 30(7), 671-678.
19. Botega D.M., Mesquita M.F., Henriques G.E., Vaz L.G., Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems, J. Oral. Rehabil., 2004, 31, 884-889.
20. Fromentin O., Lassauzay C., Abi Nader S., Feine J., de Albuquerque Jr R.F., Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures - validation of an original force measurement system, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2010, 37, 54-62.
21. Setz I., Lee S.H., Engel E., Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1998, 80, 323-329.
22. Svetlize C.A., Bodereau Jr E.F., Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures, Quintessence Int., 2004, 35, 443-448.
23. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M., Condos S., Deutsch A.S., Comparative study of two precision overdenture attachment designs, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1996 Aug, 76(2), 145-152.
24. Rutkunas V., Mizutani H., Takahashi H., Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture, J. Oral. Rehabil., 2007 Jan, 34(1), 41-51.
25. Chung K.H., Chung C.Y., Cagna D.R., Cronin R.J. Jr, Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures, J. Prosthodont., 2004 Dec, 13(4), 221-226.
26. Persson B.N.J., Sliding friction, Surface Science Reports, 1999, 33, 83-119.
27. Persson B.N.J., On the theory of rubber friction, Surface Science, 1998, 401, 445-454.