A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures

Quintessence International

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 313-319

  Sadig, Walid ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Ball; Implant; Locators; Magnet; Overdenture; Retention; Stability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAGNETISM; MANDIBLE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL CLASPS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE BASES; DENTURE PRECISION ATTACHMENT; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MAGNETICS; MANDIBLE;

EID: 67649743782     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gotfredsen K. Implant supported overdentures-The Copenhagen experience. J Dent 1997;25 (suppl 1):S39-42.
2. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures:A randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 390-396.
3. Pjetursson BE. Implant supported dentures and masticatory performance. Evid Based Dent 2008; 9: 22.
4. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on over-dentures.Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patien. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 601-602.
5. Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: Peri-implant outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 695-702.
6. Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr, Giglio JA. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant over-dentures: Part II-Patient satisfaction and preference. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 364-369.
7. Burns DR. Mandibular implant overdenture treatment:Consensus and controversy. J Prosthodont 2000; 9: 37-46.
8. Walmsley A. Magnetic retention in prosthetic dentistry. Dent Update 2002; 29: 428-433.
9. Chu F, Deng FL, Siu A, Chow T. Implant-tissue supported, magnet-retained mandibular overdenture for an edentulous patient with Parkinson's disease:A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 219-222.
10. Akaltan F, Can G. Retentive characteristics of different dental magnetic systems. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 422-427.
11. Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: A cross-over clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 99-105.
12. Alsiyabi AS, Felton DA, Cooper LF. The role of abutment- attachment selection in resolving inadequate interarch distance: A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2005; 14: 184-190.
13. Fenlon MR, Palmer RM, Palmer P, Newton JT, Sherriff M. A prospective study of single stage surgery for implant supported overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 365-370.
14. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part II:Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 195-202.
15. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part II:Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 170-177.
16. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Mulder J, Kalk W. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 263-267.
17. Highton R, Caputo AA, Kinni M, Matyas J. The interaction of a magnetically retained denture with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 486-490.
18. Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin RJ Jr. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont 2004; 13: 221-226.
19. Petropoulos VC, Smith W. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 526-535.
20. Rutkunas V, Mizutani H. Retentive and stabilizing properties of stud and magnetic attachments retaining mandibular overdenture. An in vitro study. Stomatolgija Baltic Dent Maxillofac J 2004; 6: 85-90.
21. Maeda Y. Criteria for attachment selection for implant overdenture. In:Maeda Y, Walmsley D (eds). Implant Dentistry with New Generation Magnetic Attachments: Maximum Results with Minimum Number of Implant. Tokyo: Quintessence, 2005:32-35.
22. Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. In vitro study of mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: Comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 128-134.
23. Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr, Giglio JA. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I-Patient satisfaction and preference. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 364-369.
24. Geertman ME, van Waas MA , van't Hof MA, Kalk W. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 194-200.
25. Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 375-383.