Comparative study of two precision overdenture attachment designs

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 145-152

  Cohen, Brett I ^a   Pagnillo, Mark ^a   Condos, Spyridon ^a,b   Deutsch, Allan S ^a  

^a Essential Dental Laboratories   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE PRECISION ATTACHMENT; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; HUMANS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030208975     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90298-X     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Binder J. The new Flexi-post overdenture attachment. Gen Dent 1986;362-3.
2. Jumber S. An atlas of overdentures and attachments. Chicago: Quintessence Publ Co Inc; 1981.
3. Johnson L. Overdentures using attachments and inserts. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:352-5.
4. Epstein DD, Epstein PL. A clinical comparison of three overdenture anchors. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1992;13:762-6.
5. Dummer PM, Edmunds DH, Gidden P Jr. Root canal retained restorations: 3. root-face attachments. Dent Update 1990;17:335-9.
6. Stewart BL, Edwards RO. Retention and wear of precision-type attachments. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:28-34.
7. Anderson JN, Bates JP. Cobalt-chromium partial denture: a clinical survey. Br Dent J 1959;107:57-62.
8. Tomlin HR, Osborne J. Cobalt-chromium partial dentures; a clinical survey. Br Dent J 1961;110:307-10.
9. Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Endodontic posts and cores. Part III. Clinical use of Flexi-Post. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;70:22-8.
10. Cohen BI, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention properties of a split-shaft threaded post: cut at different apical lengths. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:894-8.
11. Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A new prefabricated post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:631-4.
12. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:264-8.
13. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, Bernardi S. Retentive properties of a new post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:12-4.
14. Millstein PL, Yu H, Hsu CS, Nathanson D, Effects of cementing on retention of a prefabricated screw post. J Prosthel Dent 1987;57:171-4.
15. Brown JD, Mitchem JC. Retentive properties of dowel post systems. Oper Dent 1987;12:15-9.
16. Saunders RD, Lorey RE, Powers JM. Comparison of five post-cement systems for tensile retentive capacity [Abstract]. J Dent Res 1988; 67:304.
17. Burns DR, Douglas HB, Moon PC. Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:262-6.
18. Burgess JO, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:899-903.
19. Greenfeld RS, Roydhouse RH, Marshall FJ, Schoner B. A comparison of two post systems under applied compressive-shear loads. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:17-24.
20. Ross RS, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. J Endodont 1991; 17:450-6.
21. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the photoelastic stress for a split-shank threaded post versus a threaded post. J Prosthodont 1994;3:53-5.
22. Cohen BI, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Cyclic fatigue testing of six endodontic post systems. J Prosthodont 1993;2:28-32.
23. Leung T, Preiskel HW, Retention profiles of stud-type precision attachments. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:175-9.