Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 884-889

  Botega, D M ^a   Mesquita, M F ^a,c   Henriques, G E P ^a   Vaz, L G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Attachments; Fatigue strength; Mechanical properties; Osseointegrated implants; Overdentures; Retention

Indexed keywords

SALIVA SUBSTITUTE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTURE; FORCE; HEALTH SERVICE; IMMERSION; MACHINE; MECHANICAL STRESS; SIMULATION; STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH;

DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 5444257227     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01308.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Epstein DD, Epstein PL, Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK. Comparison of the retentive properties of six prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:579-584.
2. Petropoulos VC, Smith W, Kousvelari E. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:176-185.
3. Naert I, Quirynen M, Hooghe M, Van-Steenberghe D. A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Bränemak implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:486-491.
4. Walton JN, Ruse D. In vitro changes in clips and bars used to retain implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:482-486.
5. Lehmann KM, Arnim FV. Studies on the retention forces of snap-on attachments. Quintes Dent Technol. 1978;7:45-48.
6. Gamborena JI, Hazelton LR, Nabadalung D, Brudvik J. Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:123-130.
7. Fromentin O, Picard B, Tavernier B. In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent. 1999;11:391-397.
8. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Comparative study of two precision overdenture attachment designs. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:145-152.
9. Wichmann MG, Kuntze W. Wear behavior of precision attachments. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:409-414.
10. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Schmitt S. The effect of simulated function on the retention of bar-clip retained removable prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:570-573.
11. Setz J, Hyung S, Engel E. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:323-329.
12. Nagaoka E, Nagayasu Y, Yamashita H, Matsushiro H, Okuno Y. Study of retention in attachments for overdenture (II) O-ring attachment. J Osaka Univ Dent School. 1980;20:215-226.
13. Rigdon TF. The removable implant overdenture - 'Why didn't someone tell me that?'. J Oral Implantol. 1996;22:59-62.
14. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials, 19 edn. St Louis, MO, Mosby; 1993:54-105.