Efficient colorimetric anion detection based on positive allosteric system of urea-functionalized poly(phenylacetylene) receptor

Macromolecules

Volumn 43, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 7406-7411

  Sakai, Ryosuke ^a,b   Okade, Shota ^a   Barasa, Eric B ^a   Kakuchi, Ryohei ^a   Ziabka, Magdalena ^a,c   Umeda, Satoshi ^b   Tsuda, Katsuyuki ^b   Satoh, Toshifumi ^a   Kakuchi, Toyoji ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ASAHIKAWA NATIONAL COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOSTERISM; ANION BINDING; ANION RECEPTOR; ANION RECOGNITION; ANION SENSING; BINDING MODES; COMPLEX FORMATIONS; COMPLEX UNITS; COOPERATIVE BINDING; COOPERATIVITY; ELECTRONWITHDRAWING; FUNCTIONALIZED; HIGH YIELD; HILL COEFFICIENT; HILL PLOTS; HYDROGEN BONDINGS; MAIN CHAINS; NMR TITRATION; NORBORNADIENE; POLY(PHENYLACETYLENE); POLYMER CHAINS; RESPONSE ABILITY; STEREOSELECTIVE POLYMERIZATION; TRIFLUOROMETHYL; UREA GROUPS;

ACETYLENE; AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS; BINDING ENERGY; BIOCHEMISTRY; COLOR; COLORIMETRY; METABOLISM; POLYMERS; RHODIUM; UREA;

NEGATIVE IONS;

EID: 78651325731     PISSN: 00249297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ma1016852     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Caltagirone, C.; Gale, P. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (2), 520-563.
2. Martinez-Manez, R.; Sancenon, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103 (11), 4419-4476.
3. Gunnlaugsson, T.; Glynn, M.; Tocci, G. M.; Kruger, P. E.; Pfeffer, F. M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 3094-3117.
4. Gale, P. A.; Quesada, R. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 3219-3244.
5. Anzenbacher, P., Jr.; Nishiyabu, R.; Palacios, M. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 2929-2938.
6. Davis, A. P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 2939-2951.
7. Katayev, E. A.; Ustynyuk, Y. A.; Sessler, J. L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 3004-3037.
8. Miyaji, H.; Sessler, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, (1) 154-157.
9. Palacios, M. A.; Nishiyabu, R.; Marquez, M.; Anzenbacher, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (24), 7538-7544.
10. Takeuchi, M.; Ikeda, M.; Sugasaki, A.; Shinkai, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34 (11), 865-873.
11. Shinkai, S.; Ikeda, M.; Sugasaki, A.; Takeuchi, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34 (6), 494-503.
12. Takeuchi, M.; Shioya, T.; Swager, T. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40 (18), 3372-3376.
13. Hirata, O.; Takeuchi, M.; Shinkai, S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 30, 3805-3807.
14. dos Santos, C. M. G.; McCabe, T.; Watson, G. W.; Kruger, P. E.; Gunnlaugsson, T. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73 (23), 9235-9244.
15. Willans, C. E.; Anderson, K. M.; Potts, L. C.; Steed, J. W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7 (13), 2756-2760.
16. Okamoto, Y.; Nakano, T. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94 (2), 349-372.
17. McQuade, D. T.; Pullen, A. E.; Swager, T. M. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100 (7), 2537-2574.
18. Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (12), 3893-4012.
19. Nakano, T.; Okamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (12), 4013-4038.
20. Cornelissen, J. J. L.M.; Rowan, A. E.; Nolte, R. J.M.; Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (12), 4039-4070.
21. Thomas, S. W.; Joly, G. D.; Swager, T. M. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107 (4), 1339-1386.
22. Yashima, E.; Maeda, K.; Nishimura, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10 (1), 42-51.
23. Yashima, E.; Maeda, K. Macromolecules 2008, 41 (1), 3-12.
24. Kakuchi, R.; Nagata, S.; Sakai, R.; Otsuka, I.; Nakade, H.; Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14 (33), 10259-10266.
25. Kakuchi, R.; Nagata, S.; Tago, Y.; Sakai, R.; Otsuka, I.; Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Macromolecules 2009, 42 (5), 1476-1481.
26. Kakuchi, R.; Tago, Y.; Sakai, R.; Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Macromolecules 2009, 42 (13), 4430-4435.
27. Kakuchi, R.; Kodama, T.; Shimada, R.; Tago, Y.; Sakai, R.; Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Macromolecules 2009, 42 (12), 3892-3897.
28. Amendola, V.; Boiocchi, M.; Colasson, B.; Fabbrizzi, L. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45 (16), 6138-6147.
29. Nishiyabu, R.; Anzenbacher, P. Org. Lett. 2006, 8 (3), 359-362.
30. Gomez, D. E.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Monzani, E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3 (8), 1495-1500.
31. Jose, D. A.; Kumar, D. K.; Ganguly, B.; Das, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46 (32), 5343-5346.
32. Amendola, V.; Esteban-Gomez, D.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39 (5), 343-353.
33. Gale, P. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39 (7), 465-475.
34. Boiocchi, M.; Del Boca, L.; Gomez, D. E.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Monzani, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (50), 16507-16514.
35. a is the apparent microscopic association constant, and n is the Hill coefficient. See: Connors, K. A. Binding Constants: the Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability Wiley: New York, 1987; 59-65.
36. One reviewer of this paper pointed out the possibility that the newly developed absorbance at 470nm corresponds not to the quantity of anion bound to polymer but to the extent of conformational change. This is definitely sensible.
37. In fact, Yashima et al. have reported amplification of circular dichroism (CD) signal based on cooperative conformational change of polymer chain.37 However, we think such possibility is excluded by the following reasons: (1)Poly-1 shows the colorimetric response by the addition of anions, in which conformational change of poly-1 actually plays crucial roles as well as the complex formation. However, the colorimetric response is unexplainable by only the conformation change of poly-1.
38. In contrast toCDsignals, abosorption change should be ascribable to the complex formation event. (2)In anion recognition chemistry, a number of small molecular receptors with chromophores show the colorimetric response as a direct consequence of anion recognition event, in which the color change is considered to be based on the complex formation.
39. 470 values in the range from 0.5 to 1.0 should be much higher due to the signal amplification effect.
40. Therefore, we believe that the absorbance at 470 nm is almost identical with the quantity of anion bound to the polymer. At least, the determination of the apparent binding constant and cooperativity using this absorbance is considered to be appropriate.
41. Nonokawa, R.; Yashima, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (5), 1278-1283.
42. Green, M. M.; Peterson, N. C.; Sato, T.; Teramoto, A.; Cook, R.; Lifson, S. Science 1995, 268 (5219), 1860-1866.
43. Green, M. M.; Park, J. W.; Sato, T.; Teramoto, A.; Lifson, S.; Selinger, R. L. B.; Selinger, J. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38 (21), 3139-3154.
44. Due to the good solubility in THF, poly-2 was employed to compare the anion binding ability. See ref 26.
45. The acid-base equilibrium constants in DMSO were used as an alternative. For F-: (a) Frederick, G. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456-463.
46. For other anions: (b) Izutsu, K. Acid-Base Dissociation Constants in Dipolar Aprotic Solvents; Blackwell: London, 1990.
47. Kishimoto, Y.; Itou, M.; Miyatake, T.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. Macromolecules 2002, 28 (19), 6662-6666.