Supramolecular chemistry approach to the design of a high-resolution sensor array for multianion detection in water

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 129, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 7538-7544

  Palacios, Manuel A ^a   Nishiyabu, Ryuhei ^a   Marquez, Manuel ^a   Anzenbacher Jr , Pavel ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; HYDROGELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY; WATER;

APOENZYME; COFACTORS; COLORIMETRIC SENSOR MATERIALS;

SENSOR ARRAYS;

ACETIC ACID; ANION; APOENZYME; BENZOIC ACID; BENZYL THIOCYANATE; BROMIDE; CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CHLORIDE; FLUORIDE; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; NITRATE; PHOSPHATE; PYROPHOSPHATE; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; TOOTHPASTE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COLORIMETRY; CROSS REACTION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HYDROGEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSOR; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 34250799672     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0704784     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Harsanyi, G. In Sensors in Biomedical Applications: Fundamentals, Technology & Applications; Technomic: Lancaster, PA, 2000.
2. Fraden, J. In Handbook of Modern Sensors: Physics, Designs, and Applications; AIP Press/Springer: New York, 2004.
3. Wilson, J. S. In Sensor Technology Handbook; Wilson, J. S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2005.
4. (a) Beebe, K. R.; Pell, R. J.; Seasholtz, M. B. In Chemometrics: A Practical Guide; Wiley: New York, 1998.
5. (b) Otto, M. In Chemometrics: Statistics and Computer Application in Analytical Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, New York, 1999; p 314.
6. Cunningham, A. J. Introduction to Bioanalytical Sensors; Techniques in Analytical Chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1998.
7. Optical Biosensors: Present and Future; Ligler, F. S., Rowe Taitt, C. A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2002.
8. Prasad, P. N. Introduction to Biophotonics; Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2003.
9. (a) Albert, K. J.; Lewis, N. S.; Schauer, C. L.; Sotzing, G. A.; Stitzel, S. E.; Vaid, T. P.; Walt, D. R. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2595.
10. (b) Gardner, J. W.; Bartlett, P. N. Electronic Noses: Principles and Applications; Oxford University Press: New York, 1999.
11. Schena, M. In Microarray Analysis; Wiley-Liss: Hoboken, NJ, 2003; p 630.
12. Wright, A. T.; Anslyn, E. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 14-28.
13. Lavigne, J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3118-3130.
14. Jurs, P. C.; Bakken, G. A.; McClelland, H. E. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2649-2678.
15. Burns, J. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2583-2601.
16. Dickinson, T. A.; White, J.; Kauer, J. S.; Walt, D. R. Nature 1996, 382, 697-700.
17. Folmer-Andersen, J. F.; Kitamura, M.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5652-5653.
18. Krantz-Rulcker, C.; Stenberg, M.; Winquist, F.; Lundstrom, I. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 426, 217-226.
19. Rakow, N. A.; Suslick, K. S. Nature 2000, 406, 710-713.
20. (a) Zhang, C.; Bailey, D. P.; Suslick, K. S. J. Agric Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4925-4931.
21. (b) Zhang, C.; Suslick, K. S. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 237-242.
22. Zhou, H.; Baldini, L.; Hong, J.; Wilson, A. J.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2421-2425.
23. Wright, A. T.; Griffin, M. J.; Zhong, Z.; McCleskey, S. C.; Anslyn, E. V.; McDevitt, J. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6375-6378.
24. Matson, R. S.; Rampal, J. B. Genomic/Proteomic Technol. 2003, 3, 37-44.
25. Legin, A.; Smimova, A.; Rudnitskaya, A.; Lvova, L.; Suglobova, E.; Vlasov, Y. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 385, 131-135.
26. Potyrailo, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 702-723.
27. Green, E.; Olah, M. J.; Abramova, T.; Williams, L. R.; Stefanovic, D.; Worgall, T.; Stojanovic, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15278-15282.
28. Di Natale, C.; Davide, F.; Brunink, J. A. J.; D'Amico, A.; Vlasov, Y. G.; Legin, A. V.; Rudnitskaya, A. M. Sens. Actuators, B 1996, 34, 539-542.
29. Sessler, J. L.; Gale, P. A.; Cho, W. In Anion Receptor Chemistry; Monographs in Supramolecular Chemistry; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, U.K., 2006.
30. Schmidtchen, F. P.; Berger, M. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609-1646.
31. Steed, J. W.; Atwood, J. L. In Supramolecular Chemistry; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., New York, 2000.
32. Nishiyabu, R.; Palacios, M. A.; Dehaen, W.; Anzenbacher, P., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11496-11504.
33. Nishiyabu, R.; Anzenbacher, P., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8270-8271.
34. Nishiyabu, R.; Anzenbacher, P., Jr. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 359-362.
35. Anzenbacher, P., Jr.; Palacios, M. A.; Jursikova, K.; Marquez, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5027-5030.
36. The concentration of 20 mM was used for nitrate and hydrogen sulfate as these anions gave somewhat ambiguous responses at 5 mM.
37. The gray pixel value is a numerical value of the grey shade that for an 8-bit pixel depth detector ranges between 0 and 255.
38. The Supporting Information lists the response profiles for all the analytes.
39. (a) Suslick, K. S. MRS Bull. 2004, 29, 720-725.
40. (b) Suslick, K. S.; Rakow, N. A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 11133-11138.
41. Ward, J. H., Jr. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236-244.
42. For Ward's method first each sample is considered its own cluster; therefore, the variance is null. Then, each following step will consider a pair of objects that can be fused while keeping the amount of variance as small as possible. This process repeats until a remaining supercluster is formed.
43. (a) Poucher's Perfumes, Cosmetics and Soaps, 10th ed.; Butler, H., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2000.
44. (b) Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, 2nd ed.; Paye, M., Barel, A. O., Maibach, H. I., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
45. (c) Ingredient Analysis: Aquafresh toothpaste, 2007; http://www.chem.ox. ac.uk/course/ityeartwo/html/aquafreshtoothpaste.htm.
46. (d) Toothpastes, 2007; http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= Toothpaste&oldid=129361524.
47. Fluoridex, 2007; http://www.discusdental.com/products/oral_hygiene/ fluorides.php?group_skey=4540.
48. The HCA dendrogram yields similar results; for more details refer to the Supporting Information.
49. Cyanide samples were not included before because the response of the eight-sensor array is not completely reversible for the whole set of sensors in the presence of this anion.
50. 10 patterns. This deduction of the practical discriminatory limit is adapted from the method proposed in ref 36b by Suslick and Rakow.