The basic semen analysis

Male Infertility: Diagnosis and Treatment

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 141-169

  Menkveld, Roelof ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056552025     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (194)

1. Schirren C. Practical Andrology. Berlin: Verlag Brüder Hartman, 1972: 10
2. Lode A. Untersuchungen über die Zahlen und Regene Rationsverhältnisse der Spermatozoiden bei Hund und Mensch. Arch Gesamte Physiol 1891; 50: 278
3. Hotchkiss RS. Factors in stability and variability of semen specimens -observations on 640 successive samples from 23 men. J Urol 1941; 45: 875
4. MacLeod J, Heim LM. Characteristics and variations in semen specimens of 100 normal young men. J Urol 1945; 54: 474
5. Belding DL. Fertility in the male: I. Technical problems in establishing standards of fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1933; 26: 868
6. Williams WW, McGugan A, Carpenter HD. The staining and morphology of the human spermatozoon. J Urol 1934; 32: 201
7. Cary WH, Hotchkiss RS. Semen appraisal. A differential stain that advances the study of cell morphology. JAMA 1934; 102: 587
8. Pollak OJ, Joël CA. Sperm examination according to the present state of research. JAMA 1939; 113: 95
9. Davis CD, et al. Therapy of seminal inadequacy. I. Use of pituitary chorionic and equine gonadotropins. J Clin Endocrinol 1943; 3: 268
10. Harvey C, Jackson MH. Assessment of male fertility by semen analysis. An attempt to standardise methods. Lancet 1945; 2: 99,134
11. Hotchkiss RS. Fertility in Man. London: William Heineman Medical Books, 1945
12. Williams WW. Routine semen examinations and their interpretation. Trans Am Soc Stud Steril 1946; 139
13. Abarbanel AR, et al. Evaluation of the barren marriage. Minimal procedures. Fertil Steril 1951; 2: 1
14. MacLeod J, Gold RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. IV. Sperm morphology in fertile and infertile marriage. Fertil Steril 1952; 2: 394
15. Freund M. Standards for the rating of human sperm morphology. Int J Fertil 1966; 11: 97
16. Freund M. Semen analysis. In Behrman SJ, Kistner SW, eds., Progress in Infertility, 2nd edn. Boston: ittle, Brown & Co, 1968: 593
17. Eliasson R. Standards for investigation of human semen. Andrologie 1971; 3: 49
18. Eliasson R. Analysis of semen. In Behrman SJ, Kistner SW, eds. Progress in Infertility, 2nd edn. Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1968: 691
19. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 1st edn. Singapore: ress Concern, 1980
20. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 2nd edn. Cambridge: ambridge University Press, 1987
21. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd edn. Cambridge: ambridge University Press, 1992
22. World Health Organization. Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th edn. Cambridge: ambridge University Press, 1999
23. Jager S, Kremer J, Van Slochteren-Draaisma T. A simple method of screening for antisperm antibodies in the human male -detection of spermatozoal surface IgG with the direct Mixed Antiglobulin Reaction carried out on untreated fresh human semen. Int J Fertil 1978; 23: 12
24. Nahoum CR, Cardozo D. Staining for volumetric count of leukocytes in semen and prostate-vesicular fluid. Fertil Steril 1980; 34: 68
25. Kremer J. A simple sperm penetration test. Int J Fertil 1965; 10: 209
26. Zavos PM, Cohen MR. Bovine mucus penetration test: an assay for fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1980; 34: 175
27. Mortimer D, et al. A simplified approach to sperm-cervical mucus interaction testing using a hyaluronate migration test. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 35
28. Kremer J, Jager S. The sperm-cervical mucus contact test: a preliminary report. Fertil Steril 1976; 27: 35
29. Yanagimachi R, Yanagimachi H, Rogers BJ. The use of zona-free hamster ova as a test-system for the assessment of the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1976; 15: 471
30. Franken DR, et al. Hemizona assay and teratozoospermia: ncreasing sperm insemination concentrations to enhance zona pellucida binding. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 497
31. Henkel R, et al. DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa and ART. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7: 477
32. Kruger TF, Menkveld R. Acrosome reaction, acrosin levels, and sperm morphology in assisted reproduction. Assist Reprod Rev 1996; 6: 27
33. Henkel R, et al. Effect of reactive oxygen species produced by spermatozoa and leukocytes on sperm functions in non-leukocytospermic patients. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 635
34. Rhemrev JPT, et al. The acrosome index and the fast TRAP as protection of IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1885
35. McDonough P. Editorial comment: has traditional sperm analysis lost its clinical relevance? Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 585
36. Schrader SM. Safety guidelines for the andrology laborator. Fertil Steril 1989: 51; 387
37. Mortimer D. The male factor in infertility. Part I: emen analysis. Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil 1985; 8: 4
38. Alexander NJ. Male evaluation and semen analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 25: 463
39. Mortimer D. Practical Laboratory Andrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994
40. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Basic semen analysis. In Acosta AA, Kruger TF, eds. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction, 2nd edn. Carnforth: arthenon Publishing, 1996: 53
41. Menkveld R. An investigation of environmental influences on spermatogenesis and semen parameters. PhD dissertation (in Afrikaans), Faculty of Medicine, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, 1987
42. Elzanaty S, Malm J, Giwercman A. Duration of sexual abstinence: epididymal and accessory sex gland secretions and their relationship to sperm motility. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 221
43. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Basic semen analysis. In Acosta AA, et al. eds. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1990: 68
44. Freund M. Performance and interpretation of the semen analysis. In Rolands M, ed. Management of the Infertile Couple. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1968: 48
45. Zaneveld LJD, Polakoski KL. Collection and the physical examination of the ejaculate. In Hafez ESE, ed. Techniques of Human Andrology. Amsterdam: lsevier, North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1977: 147
46. Mandal A, Bhattacharyya AK. Studies on the coagulational characteristics of human ejaculates. Andrologia 1985; 17: 80-6
47. Amelar RD. Coagulation, liquefaction and viscosity of human semen. J Urol 1962; 87: 187
48. Mann T. Biochemical appraisal of human semen. In Joël CA, ed. Fertility Disturbances in Men and Women. Basel: Karger, 1971: 146
49. Portnoy L. The diagnosis and prognosis of male infertility: a study of 44 cases with special reference to sperm morphology. J Urol 1946; 48: 735
50. Vermeiden JPW, et al. Pregnancy rate is significantly higher in in vitro fertilization procedure with spermatozoa isolated from nonliquefying semen in which liquefaction is induced by α-amylase. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 149
51. Tucker M, et al. Use of chymotrypsin for semen preparation in ART. Mol Androl 1990; 2: 179
52. Hancock P, McLaughlin E. British Andrology Society guidelines for the assessment of post vasectomy semen samples. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 812
53. Kvist U, Björndahl L. Manual on Basic Semen Analysis. ESHRE Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002
54. Eliasson R. Supravital staining of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1977; 28: 1257
55. Menkveld R. Leukocytospermia. In Daya S, Harrison RF, Kempers RD, eds. Advances in Fertility and Reproductive Medicine. International Congress Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004; 1266: 218
56. Goldenberg RL, White R. The effect of vaginal lubricants on sperm motility in vitro. Fertil Steril 1975; 26: 872
57. Carruthers GB. Assessment of the semen. In Philipp EE, Carruthers, GB, eds. Infertility. London: illiam Heinemann Medical Books, 1981: 195
58. Appell RA, Evans PR. The effect of temperature on sperm motility and viability. Fertil Steril 1977; 28: 329
59. Makler A. The thickness of microscopically examined seminal samples and its relationship to sperm motility estimation. Int J Androl 1978; 1: 213
60. Folgerí T, et al. Mitochondrial disease and reduced sperm motility. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1863
61. Barthelemy C, et al. Tail stump spermatozoa: morphogenesis of defect. An ultrastructural study of sperm and testicular biopsy. Andrologia 1989; 22: 17
62. Eliasson R, et al. The immotile-cilia syndrome. A congenital ciliary abnormality as an etiologic factor in chronic airway infection and male sterility. N Engl J Med 1977; 297: 1
63. Atherton RW. Evaluation of sperm motility. In Hafez ESE, ed. Techniques of Human Andrology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1977: 173
64. MacLeod J, Pazianos A, Ray BS. Restoration of human spermatogenisis by menopausal gonadotrophins. Lancet 1964; 1: 196
65. Purvis K, Brekke I, Tollefsrud A. Epididymal secretory function in men with asthenoteratozoospermia. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 850
66. Bar-Sagie D, Mayevsky A, Bartoov B. A fluorometric technique for simultaneous measurement of pH and motility in ram semen. Arch Androl 1981; 7: 7
67. Kesserü E, León F. Effect of different solid metals and metallic pairs on human sperm motility. Int J Fertil 1974; 19: 81
68. Macomber D, Sanders MB. The spermatozoa count. Its value in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sterility. N Engl J Med 1929; 200: 81
69. Van Zyl JA. A review of the male factor in 231 infertile couples. S Afr J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 10: 7
70. Menkveld R, Van Zyl JA, Kotze TJvW. A statistical comparison of three methods for the counting of human spermatozoa. Andrologia 1984; 16: 554
71. Makler A. The improved ten-micrometer chamber for rapid sperm count and motility evaluation. Fertil Steril 1980; 33: 337
72. MacLeod J, Gold RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoa counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951; 66: 436
73. Van Zyl JA, et al. The importance of spermiograms that meet the requirements of international standards and the most important factors that influence semen parameter. In Proceedings of the 17th Congress of the International Urological Society. Paris: Diffusion Dion Editeurs, 1976; 2: 263
74. Van Zyl JA, et al. Oligozoospermia: a seven-year survey of the incidence, chromosomal aberrations, treatment and pregnancy rate. Int J Fertil 1975; 20: 29
75. Menkveld R, et al. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 586
76. Kruger TF, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1118
77. Kruger TF, et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112
78. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Evaluation of sperm morphology by light microscopy. In Acosta AA, Kruger TF, eds. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction, 2nd edn. Carnforth: Parthenon Publishing, 1996: 109
79. Mortimer D, Menkveld R. Sperm morphology assessment -historical perspectives and current opinions. J Androl 2001; 22: 192
80. Kruger TF, et al. A quick, reliable staining technique for human sperm morphology. Arch Androl 1987; 18: 275
81. Oettlé EE. Using a new acrosome stain to evaluate sperm morphology. Vet Med 1986; 81: 263
82. Menkveld R. Appendices. In Menkveld R, et al., eds. Atlas of Human Sperm Morphology. Baltimore: illiams & Wilkins, 1991: 115
83. Menkveld R, et al. Effect of different staining and washing procedures on the results of human sperm morphology evaluation by manual and computerised methods. Andrologia 1997; 29: 1
84. Menkveld R, et al. Basic principles and practical aspects. In Menkveld R, et al., eds. Atlas of Human Sperm Morphology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1991: 6
85. Menkveld R, et al. Acrosomal morphology as a novel criterion for male fertility diagnosis: relation with acrosin activity, morphology (strict criteria) and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 637
86. Cooper TG, et al. Cytoplasmic droplets are normal structures of human sperm but are not well preserved by routine procedures for assessing sperm morphology. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2283
87. Cooper TG. New debate. Cytoplasmic droplets: the good, the bad or just confusing? Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 9
88. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Sperm morphology and male urogenital infections. Andrologia 1998; 30 (Suppl 1): 49
89. Johanisson E, et al. Evaluation of ‘round cells’ in semen analysis: a comparative study. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 404
90. Riedel H-H, Semm K. Leucospermia and male fertility. Arch Androl 1980; 5: 51
91. Riedel H-H. Techniques for the detection of leukocytospermia in human semen. Arch Androl 1980; 5: 87
92. Mahmoud A, Comhaire F. Debate continued. Antisperm antibodies. Use of the mixed agglutination reaction (MAR) test using latex beads. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 231
93. Friberg J. A simple and sensitive micro-method for demonstration of sperm-agglutinating activity in serum from infertile men and women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1974; 36 (Suppl): 21
94. Isojima S, Shun T, Ashitaka Y. Immunologic analysis of sperm-immobilizing factor found in sera of women with unexplained sterility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 101: 677
95. Menkveld R, et al. Detection of sperm antibodies on unwashed spermatozoa with the immunobead test: a comparison of results with the routine method and seminal plasma TAT and SCMC test. Am J Reprod Immunol 1991; 25: 88
96. Ariagno J, et al. Shedding of immature germ cells. Arch Androl 2002; 48: 127
97. Endtz AW. A rapid staining method for differentiating granulocytes from ‘germinal cells’ in Papanicolaou-stained semen. Acta Cytol 1974; 18: 2
98. Comhaire F, Verschraegen G, Vermeulen L. Diagnosis of accessory gland infection and its possible role in male infertility. Int J Androl 1980; 3: 32
99. Wolff H. Methods for the detection of male genital tract inflammation. Andrologia 1998; 30 (Suppl 1): 5
100. Shekarriz M. Positive myeloperoxidase staining (Endtz test) as an indicator of excessive reactive oxygen species formation in semen. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12: 70
101. Wolff H, Anderson DJ. Immunohistologic characterization and quantitation of leukocyte subpopulations in human semen. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 497
102. Eggert-Kruse W, et al. Differentiation of round cells by means of monoclonal antibodies and relationship with male fertility. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 046
103. Tomlinson MJ, et al. The removal of morphologically abnormal sperm forms by phagocytes: a positive role for seminal leukocytes? Hum Reprod 1992; 10: 517
104. Tomlinson MJ, et al. Round cells and sperm fertilizing capacity: the presence of immature germ cells but not seminal leukocytes are associated with reduced success of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 1257
105. Ricci G, et al. Leukocyte detection in human semen using flow cytometry. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1329
106. Ludwig M, et al. Evaluation of seminal plasma parameters in patients with chronic prostatitis or leukocytospermia. Andrologia 1998; 30 (Suppl 1): 1
107. Esfandiari N, et al. Utility of nitroblue tetrazolium test for assessment of reactive oxygen species production by seminal leukocytes and spermatozoa. J Androl 2003; 24: 862
108. Punab M, et al. The limit of leukocytospermia from the microbiological viewpoint. Andrologia 2003; 35: 271
109. Wolff H. The biological significance of white blood cells in semen. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1143
110. Fedder J. Nonsperm cells in human semen: with special reference to seminal leukocytes and their possible influence on fertility. Arch Androl 1996; 36: 41
111. Leib Z, et al. Reduced semen quality caused by chronic abacterial prostatitis: an enigma or reality? Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 1109
112. Menkveld R, et al. Morphological sperm alternations in different types of prostatitis. Andrologia 2003; 35: 288
113. Politch JA, et al. Comparison of methods to enumerate white blood cells in semen. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 372
114. Berger RE, et al. The relationship of pyospermia and seminal fluid bacteriology to sperm function as reflected in the sperm penetration assay. Fertil Steril 1982; 37: 557
115. Wolff H, et al. Leukocytospermia is associated with poor semen quality. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 528
116. Tomlinson MJ, Barratt CLR, Cooke ID. Prospective study of leukocytes and leukocytes subpopulations in semen suggest they are not a cause of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 1069
117. Aitken RJ, Baker HWG. Seminal leukocytes: passengers, terrorists or good Samaritans? Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1736
118. Purvis K, Christiansen E. Infection in the male reproductive tract. Impact, diagnosis and treatment in relation to male fertility. Int J Androl 1993; 16: 1
119. Yanushpolsky EH, et al. Antibiotic therapy and leukocytospermia: a prospective, randomised, controlled study. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 142
120. Trum JW, et al. Value of detecting leukocytospermia in the diagnosis of genital tract infection in subfertile men. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 315
121. Rodin DM, Larone D, Goldstein M. Relationship between semen cultures, leukospermia, and semen analysis in men undergoing fertility evaluation. Fertil Steril 2003; 79 (Suppl 3): 1555
122. Eggert-Kruse W, et al. Induction of immunoresponse by subclinical male genital tract infection? Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 1202
123. Cottell E, et al. Are seminal fluid microorganisms of significance or merely contaminants? Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 465
124. Willén M, et al. The bacterial flora of the genitourinary tract in healthy fertile men. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996; 30: 387
125. Omu AE, et al. Seminal immune response in infertile men with leukocytospermia: effect on antioxidant activity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 86: 195
126. Kaleli S, et al. Does leukocytospermia associate with poor semen parameters and sperm function in male fertility? The role of different seminal leukocytes concentrations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 89: 185
127. Kiessling AA, et al. Seminal leukocytes: friends or foes? Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 196
128. Chan PJ, et al. White blood cells in semen affect hyperactivation but not sperm membrane integrity in the head and tail regions. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 86
129. Arata de Bellabarba G, et al. Nonsperm cells in human semen and their relationship with semen parameters. Arch Androl 2000; 45: 131
130. Aitken RJ, et al. Differential contribution of leukocytes and spermatozoa to generation of oxygen species in the ejaculates of oligozoospermic patients and fertile donors. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 94: 451
131. Alvarez JG, et al. Increased DNA damage in sperm from leukocytospermic semen samples as determined by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 319
132. Aitken RJ, Irvine DS, Wu FC. Prospective analysis of sperm oocyte fusion and reactive oxygen species generation as criteria for the diagnosis of infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 542
133. Barratt CLR, Bolton AE, Cooke ID. Functional significance of white blood cells in the male and female reproductive tract. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 39
134. Anderson DJ. Should male infertility patients be tested for leukocytospermia? Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 46
135. Hillier SL, et al. Relationship of bacteriologic characteristics to semen indices in men attending an infertility clinic. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 800
136. Purvis K, Christiansen E. The impact of infection on sperm quality. J Br Fertil Soc 1995; 1: 31
137. Bieniek KW, Riedel H-H. Bacterial foci in teeth, oral cavity, and jaw -secondary effects (remote action) of bacterial colonies with respect to bacteriospermia and subfertility in males. Andrologia 1993; 25: 159
138. Busolo F, Zanchetta R, Cusinato R. Microbial flora in semen of asymptomatic infertile men. Andrologia 1984; 16: 269
139. Skau PA, Folstad I. Do bacterial infections cause reduced ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis of antibiotic treatment of male infertility. Behavioral Ecol 2003; 14: 40
140. Eggert-Kruse W, et al. Antisperm antibodies and microorganisms in genital secretions -a clinical significant relationship? Andrologia 1998; 30 (Suppl 1): 61
141. Mićić S, Petrovic S, Dotlić R. Seminal antisperm antibodies and genitourinary infections. Urology 1990; 35: 54
142. Close CE, Roberts PA, Berger RE. Cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana are related to pyospermia in infertile men. J Urol 1990; 144: 900
143. Trummer H, et al. The impact of cigarette smoking on human semen parameters and hormones. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1554
144. Matthews GJ, Goldstein M, Schlegel HJM. Nonbacterial pyospermia: a consequence of clomiphene citrate therapy. Int J Fertil Menopaus Stud 1995; 40: 187
145. Branigan EF, Muller CH. Efficacy of treatment and recurrence rate of leukocytospermia in infertile men with prostatitis. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 580
146. Branigan EF, Spadoni LR, Muller CH. Identification and treatment of leukocytospermia in couples with unexplained infertility. J Reprod Med 1995; 40: 625
147. Erel TE, et al. Antibiotic therapy in men with leukocytospermia. Int J Fertil 1997; 42: 206
148. Krisp A, et al. Treatment with levofloxacin does not resolve asymptomatic leukocytospermia -a randomised controlled study. Andrologia 2003; 35: 44
149. Maruyama DK, et al. Effects of white blood cells on the in vitro penetration of zona-free hamster eggs by human spermatozoa. J Androl 1985; 6: 127
150. Montag M, Van der Ven H, Haidl G. Recovery of ejaculated spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection after anti-inflammatory treatment of an azoospermic patient with genital tract infection: a case report. Andrologia 1999; 31: 179
151. Malallah YA, Zissis NP. Effect of minocycline on the sperm count and activity in infertile men with high pus cell counts in their seminal fluid. J Chemother 1992; 4: 286
152. Yamamoto M, et al. Antibiotic and ejaculation treatments improve resolution rate of leukocytospermia in infertile men with prostatitis. Nagoya J Med Sci 1995; 58: 41
153. Ekwere PD, Etuk EH. Semen quality among subfertile males following treatment with ofloxacin. Curr Ther Res 1991; 50: 425
154. Bar-Chama N, Goluboff E, Fisch H. Infection and pyospermia in male infertility. Is it really a problem? Urol Clin North Am 1994; 21: 469
155. Schlegel PN, Chang TSK, Marshall FF. Antibiotics: otential hazard to male fertility. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 235
156. Blom E. A one-minute live-dead sperm stain by means of eosin-nigrosin. Fertil Steril 1950; 1: 176
157. Björndahl L, et al. Andrology Lab Corner. Why the WHO recommendations for eosin-nigrosin staining techniques for human sperm vitality assessment must change. J Androl 2004; 25: 671
158. Comhaire F, et al. Why do we continue to determine -glucosidase in human semen? Andrologia 2002; 34: 8
159. Maegawa M, et al. Concentration of granulocyte elastase in seminal plasma is not associated with sperm motility. Arch Androl 2001; 47: 31
160. Blenk H, Hofstetter A. Complement C3, coeruloplasmin and PMN-elastase in the ejaculate in chronic prostato-adnexitis and their diagnostic value. Infections 1991; 19 (Suppl 3): 138
161. Amelar RD. Infertility in Men. Philadelphia: FA Davies, 1966: 13
162. Knuth UA, Yeung C-H, Nieschlag E. Computerized semen analysis: objective measurement of semen characteristics is biased by subjective parameter setting. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 118
163. Mortimer D, Goel N, Shu MA. Evaluation of the CellSoft automated semen analysis system in a routine laboratory setting. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 960
164. Kruger TF, et al. A new computerized method of reading sperm morphology (strict criteria) is as efficient as technician reading. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 02
165. ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Guidelines on the application of CASA technology in the analysis of spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 42
166. ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Consensus workshop on advanced diagnostic andrology techniques. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1463
167. Cooper TG, et al. Semen analysis and external quality control schemes for semen analysis need global standardization. Int J Androl 2002; 25: 306
168. Björndahl L, et al. ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995-1999: immediate beneficial effects of standardized training. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1299
169. Franken DR, et al. Monitoring technologist reading skills in a sperm morphology quality control program. Fertil Steril 2003; 79 (Suppl 3): 1637
170. Álvarez C, et al. Biological variation of seminal parameters in health subjects. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2082
171. Mortimer D, et al. Annual patterns of human sperm production and semen quality. Arch Androl 1983; 10: 1
172. Tjoa WS, et al. Circannual rhythm in human sperm count revealed by serially independent sampling. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 454
173. Saint Pol P, et al. Circannual rhythms of sperm parameters of fertile men. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 030
174. Rojansky N, Brzezinski A, Schenker JG. Seasonality in human reproduction: an update. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 735
175. Henkel R, et al. Seasonal changes in human sperm chromatin condensation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001; 18: 371
176. MacLeod J. The clinical implications of deviations in human spermatogenesis as evidenced in seminal cytology and experimental production of these deviation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Stockholm, June 16-22. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series. 1966; 133: 563
177. MacLeod J. Effect of chickenpox and of pneumonia on semen quality. Fertil Steril 1951; 2: 523
178. Fredricsson B. On the development of different morphologic abnormalities of human spermatozoa. Andrologia 1978; 10: 43
179. Menkveld R, et al. Possible changes in male fertility over a 15-year period. Arch Androl 1986. 17: 143
180. Menkveld R, Kotze TJvW, Kruger TF. Relationship of human sperm morphology with other semen parameters as seen in different reference populations. Hum Reprod 1992; 6 (Suppl 1): 96
181. Mehan DJ, Chehval MJ. A clinical evaluation of a new silastic seminal fluid collection device. Fertil Steril 1977; 28: 689
182. Amelar RD, Dubin L, Schoenfeld C. Semen analysis: n office technique. Urology 1973; 2: 605
183. Taylor PJ, Martin RH. Semen analysis in the investigation of infertility. Can Fam Phys 1981; 27: 113
184. Jouannet P, et al. Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. 1. Study of sperm characteristics. Int J Androl 1988; 11: 379
185. MacLeod J, Gold RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. VIII. A study of variation in semen quality. Fertil Steril 1952; 7: 387
186. MacLeod J. A possible factor in etiology of human male infertility. Fertil Steril 1962; 13: 29
187. Van Zyl JA, Kotze TJvW, Menkveld R. Predictive value of spermatozoa morphology in natural fertilization. In Acosta AA, et al., eds. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction. Baltimore: illiams & Wilkins, 1990: 319
188. Van Zyl JA. The infertile couple. Part II. Examination and evaluation of semen. S Afr Med J 1980; 57: 85
189. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Basic semen analysis: the Tygerberg experience. In Acosta AA, et al., eds. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1990: 164
190. Ombelet W, et al. Semen parameters in a fertile versus infertile population: a need for change in the interpretation of semen testing. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 987
191. Zinaman MJ, et al. Semen quality and human fertility: prospective study with healthy couples. J Androl 2000; 21: 145
192. Guzick DS, et al. Sperm morphology, motility and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1388
193. Günalp S, et al. A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 110
194. Menkveld R, et al. Semen parameters including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardisation of in vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1165