Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease

Cortex

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 332-341

  Galpin, Adam ^a   Tipper, Steven P ^b   Dick, Jeremy P R ^c   Poliakoff, Ellen ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c HOPE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Affordances; Cueing; Parkinson's disease; Stimulus response compatibility; Visuomotor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OBJECT AFFORDANCE EFFECT; ORIENTATION; PARAMETER; PARKINSON DISEASE; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL COMPATIBILITY EFFECT; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 78650969683     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Acosta E., Simon J.R. The effect of irrelevant information on the stages of processing. Journal of Motor Behavior 1976, 8:181-187.
2. Anderson S.J., Yamagishi N., Karavia V. Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2002, 269:1225-1232.
3. Boccardi E., Della Salla S., Motto C., Spinnler H. Utilisation behaviour consequent to bilateral SMA softening. Cortex 1999, 38:289-308.
4. Brown R.G., Jahanshahi M., Marsden D. Response choice in Parkinson's disease: The effects of uncertainty and stimulus-response compatibility. Brain 1993, 116:869-885.
5. Castiello U., Ansuini C., Bulgheroni M., Scaravilli T., Nicoletti R. Visuomotor priming effects in Parkinson's disease patients depend on the match between the observed and the executed action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:835-842.
6. Cope M.T., Georgiou N., Bradshaw J.L., Iansek R., Phillips J.G. Simon effect and attention in Parkinson's disease: A comparison with huntington's disease and tourette's syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1996, 18:276-290.
7. Delaney H.D., Maxwell S.E. On using analysis of covariance in repeated measures designs. Multivariate Behavioural Research 1981, 16:105-128.
8. Ellis R., Tucker M. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of actions by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology 2000, 91:451-471.
9. Fahn S., Elton R.G. Members of the UPDRS development committee: Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease 1987, 153-163. Macmillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park (NJ). S. Fahn, C.D. Marsden, D.B. Calne, M. Goldstein (Eds.).
10. Fielding J., Georgiou-Karistianis N., Bradshaw J., Millist L., White O. No sequence dependent modulation of the Simon effect in Parkinson's disease. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:251-260.
11. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. " Mini-mental state" A practical method for grading the cognitive state for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975, 12:189-198.
12. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
13. Glickstein M., Stein J. Paradoxical movement in Parkinson's disease. Trends in Neurosciences 1991, 14:480-482.
14. Grèzes J., Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:212-222.
15. Grèzes J., Armony J., Rowe J., Passingham R. Activations related to " mirror" and " canonical" neurons in the human brain: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 2003, 18:928-937.
16. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., Passingham R. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 17:2735.
17. Hammond N., Barber P. Evidence for abstract response codes: Ear-hand correspondence effect in a three choice reaction-time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1978, 30:71-82.
18. Jahanshahi M., Jenkins H., Brown R.G., Marsden C.D., Passingham R.E., Brooks D.J. Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with pet and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's diseases subjects. Brain 1995, 118:913-933.
19. Kritikos A., Leahy C., Bradshaw J.L., Iansek R., Phillips J.G., Bradshaw J.A. Contingent and non-contingent auditory cueing in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:1193-1203.
20. Majsak M.J., Kaminski T., Gentile A.M., Flanagan J.R. The reaching movements of patients with Parkinson's disease under self-determined maximal speed and visually cued conditions. Brain 1998, 121:755-766.
21. Nachev P., Kennard C., Hussain M. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:856-869.
22. Nelson H.E. National Adult Reading Test (NART) 1991, NFER-Nelson, London.
23. Nicoletti R., Umilta C. Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research 1994, 56:144-150.
24. Nieuwboer A., Vercruysse S., Feys P., Levin O., Spildooren J., Swinnen S. Upper limb movement interruptions are correlated to freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. European Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:1422-1430.
25. Oliveira R.M., Gurd J.M., Nixon P., Marshall J.C., Passingham R.E. Micrographia in Parkinson's disease: The effect of providing external cues. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1997, 63:429-433.
26. Phillips J.C., Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:540-558.
27. Poliakoff E., Galpin A., Dick J., Moore P., Tipper S.P. The effect of viewing graspable objects and actions in Parkinson's disease. NeuroReport 2007, 18:483-487.
28. Poliakoff E., O'Boyle D.J., Moore A.P., McGlone F.P., Cody F.W.J., Spence C. Orienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: Tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition. Brain 2003, 126:2081-2092.
29. Praamstra P., Plat F.M. Failed suppression of direct visuomotor activation in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:31-43.
30. Raven J.C. Guide to Using the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale with the Progressive Matrices Scales 1958, HK Lewis and Co. Ltd, London.
31. Redgrave P., Prescott T.J., Gurney K. The basal ganglia: A vertebrate solution to the selection problem?. Neuroscience 1999, 89:1009-1023.
32. Rubichi S., Nicoletti R., Iani C., Umilta C. The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1353-1364.
33. Rubinstein T.C., Giladi N., Hausdorff J.M. The power of cueing to circumvent dopamine deficits: A review of physical therapy treatment of gait disturbances in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders 2002, 17:1148-1160.
34. Simon J.R., Acosta E. Effect of irrelevant information on the processing or relevant information: Facilitation and/or interference? The influence of experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics 1982, 31:383-388.
35. Simon J.R., Acosta E., Mewaldt S.P., Speidel C.R. The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics 1976, 19:16-22.
36. Simon J.R., Small A.M. Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology 1969, 53:433-435.
37. Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M. Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:1337-1361.
38. Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M. Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica 2007, 124:238-255.
39. Tipper S.P., Paul M.A., Hayes A.E. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:493-498.
40. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
41. Tucker M., Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:769-800.
42. Van Selst M., Jolicoeur P. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 47:631-650.
43. Vingerhoets G., Vandamme K., Vercammen A. Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain and Cognition 2009, 69:481-489.
44. Wallace R.J. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 88:354-360.
45. Wittfoth M., Buck D., Fahle M., Herrmanna M. Comparison of two Simon tasks: Neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception. NeuroImage 2006, 32:921-929.
46. Wylie S.A., Stout J.C., Bashore T.R. Activation of conflicting responses in Parkinson's disease: Evidence for degrading and facilitating effects on response time. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1033-1043.
47. Yesavage J.A., Brink T.L., Rose T.L., Lum O., Huang V., Adey M., et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1983, 17:37-49.