Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 481-489

  Vingerhoets, G ^a   Vandamme, K ^a   Vercammen, A ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Action priming; Grasping; Object affordance; Tool knowledge; Visuomotor priming

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60849099021     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bartolo A., Daumüller M., Della Sala S., and Goldenberg G. Relationship between object related gestures and the fractionated object knowledge system. Behavioural Neurology 18 (2007) 143-147
2. Buxbaum L.J., and Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language 82 (2002) 179-199
3. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., and Menon R. On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Cognitive Brain Research 25 (2005) 226-239
4. Chao L.L., Haxby J.V., and Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 913-919
5. Chao L.L., and Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 12 (2000) 478-484
6. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Umiltà C.A., and Rizzolatti G. Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. Neuroreport 8 (1996) 347-349
7. Creem-Regehr S.H., and Lee J.N. Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special?. Cognitive Brain Research 22 (2005) 457-469
8. Daprati E., and Sirigu A. How we interact with objects: Learning from brain lesions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 265-270
9. Ellis R., and Tucker M. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology 91 (2000) 451-471
10. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Michigan, Houghton Mifflin 332 pp
11. Goldenberg G., and Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 581-589
12. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., and Rizzolatti G. Premotor activation during observation and naming tools. NeuroImage 6 (1997) 231-236
13. Grèzes J., and Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 212-222
14. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., and Passingham R.E. Object automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 17 (2003) 2735-2740
15. Handy T.C., Grafton S.T., Shroff N.M., Ketay S., and Gazzaniga M.S. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience 6 (2003) 421-427
16. Hodges J.R., Bozeat S., Ralph M.A., Patterson K., and Spatt J. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use-Evidence from semantic dementia. Brain 123 (2000) 1913-1925
17. Hodges J.R., Spatt J., and Patterson K. "What" and "how": Evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 (1999) 9444-9448
18. Hommel B. Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research 56 (1994) 261-268
19. Humphreys G. Objects, affordances, .action!. The Psychologist 14 (2001) 408-412
20. Jeannerod M., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G., and Sakata H. Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neuroscience 18 (1995) 314-320
21. Kornblum S., Stevens G.T., Whipple A., and Requin J. The effects of irrelevant stimuli: The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1999) 855-875
22. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., and Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379 (1996) 649-652
23. Norman D.A. The design of everyday things (1988), New York, Basic books 257p
24. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
25. Osiurak F., Aubin G., Allain P., Jarry C., Richard I., and Le Gall D. Object utilization and object usage: A single-case study. Neurocase 14 (2008) 169-183
26. Phillips J.A., Humphreys G.W., Noppeney U., and Price C.J. The neural substrates of action retrieval: An examination of semantic and visual routes to action. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 662-684
27. Phillips J.C., and Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 540-558
28. Riddoch M.J., and Humphreys G.W. Visual object processing in a case of optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 4 (1987) 131-185
29. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., and Price C.J. Routes to action: Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 6 (1989) 437-454
30. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., and Gallese V. Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12 (2002) 149-154
31. Rumiati R.I., and Humphreys G.W. Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 631-647
32. Roy E.A., and Square P.A. Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal and oral apraxia. In: Roy E.A. (Ed). Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders Vol. 23 (1985), Series Advances in Psychology, North-Holland, Amsterdam 111-161
33. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.R., and Poncet M. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition-A case of multimodal agnosia. Brain 114 (1991) 2555-2573
34. Spatt J., Bak T., Bozeat S., Patterson K., and Hodges J.R. Apraxia, mechanical problem solving and semantic knowledge-Contributions to object usage in corticobasal degeneration. Journal of Neurology 249 (2002) 601-608
35. Symes E., Ellis R., and Tucker M. Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition 12 (2005) 1337-1361
36. Tucker M., and Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 830-846
37. Tucker M., and Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 8 (2001) 769-800
38. Tucker M., and Ellis R. Action priming by briefly presented actions. Acta Psychologica 116 (2004) 185-203
39. Valyear K.F., Cavina-Pratesi C., Stiglick A.J., and Culham J.C. Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp?. NeuroImage 36 (2007) T94-T108
40. Vingerhoets G. Knowing about tools: Neural correlates of tool familiarity and experience. NeuroImage 40 (2008) 1380-1391