Evaluation of the generality and accuracy of a new mesh morphing procedure for the human femur

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 112-120

  Grassi, Lorenzo ^a   Hraiech, Najah ^b   Schileo, Enrico ^a   Ansaloni, Mauro ^a   Rochette, Michel ^b   Viceconti, Marco ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b ANSYS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone biomechanics; Femur; Mesh morphing; Radial basis function; Subject specific finite element model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN; FE MODEL; FE-MODELLING; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENTS; HUMAN FEMORA; IN-VITRO; MESH MORPHING; MESH QUALITY; MORPHING; P-VALUES; PREDICTION ACCURACY; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELLING; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC;

ALGORITHMS; ATTITUDE CONTROL; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FORECASTING; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; RATING; STATISTICAL METHODS; STRAIN;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANTEVERSION ANGLE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOMECHANICAL LENGTH; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EPICONDYLE LENGTH; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR HEAD RADIUS; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR NECK LENGTH; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STRAIN; MECHANICAL STRESS; MESH MORPHING ALGORITHM; MORPHOLOGY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PERIOSTEUM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VARUS VALGUS ANGLE; VOLUMETRIC SKEWNESS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78650938491     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Viceconti M., Davinelli M., Taddei F., Cappello A. Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. J Biomech 2004, 37:1597-1605.
2. Bessho M., Ohnishi I., Matsuyama J., Matsumoto T., Imai K., Nakamura K. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. J Biomech 2007, 40:1745-1753.
3. Trabelsi N., Yosibash Z., Milgrom C. Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur. J Biomech 2009, 42:234-241.
4. Schileo E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Cristofolini L., Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J Biomech 2007, 40:2982-2989.
5. Schileo E., Taddei F., Cristofolini L., Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. J Biomech 2008, 41:356-367.
6. Baldwin M.A., Langenderfer J.E., Rullkoetter P.J., Laz P.J. Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009, 97:232-240.
7. Sigal I.A., Whyne C.M. Mesh morphing and response surface analysis: quantifying sensitivity of vertebral mechanical behavior. Ann Biomed Eng 2009, 38:41-56.
8. Bryan R., Mohan P.S., Hopkins A., Galloway F., Taylor M., Nair P.B. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. Med Eng Phys 2010, 32:57-65.
9. Alexa M. Recent advances in mesh morphing. Comput Graph Forum 2002, 21:173-198.
10. Sigal I.A., Hardisty M.R., Whyne C.M. Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling. J Biomech 2008, 41:1381-1389.
11. Belenguer Querol L., Buchler P., Rueckert D., Nolte L.P., Gonzalez Ballester M.A. Statistical finite element model for bone shape and biomechanical properties. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006, 9:405-411.
12. Bryan R., Mohan P.S., Hopkins A., Galloway F., Taylor M., Nair P.B. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. Med Eng Phys 2009, 32:57-65.
13. Couteau B., Payan Y., Lavallée S. The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3D mesh generator for finite element structures. J Biomech 2000, 33:1005-1009.
14. Luboz V., Chabanas M., Swider P., Payan Y. Orbital and maxillofacial computer aided surgery: patient-specific finite element models to predict surgical outcomes. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2005, 8:259-265.
15. Luboz V., Couteau B., Payan Y. 3D finite element meshing of entire femore by using the mesh matching algorithm. Proceedings of the Transactions of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society 2001, 522. B.S. Tripped (Ed.).
16. O'Reilly M.A., Whyne C.M. Comparison of computed tomography based parametric and patient-specific finite element models of the healthy and metastatic spine using a mesh-morphing algorithm. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33:1876-1881.
17. Tada M., Yoshida H., Mochimaru M. Geometric modeling of living tissue for subject-specific finite element analysis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006, (Suppl.):6639-6642.
18. Rajamani K.T., Hug J., Nolte L.P., Styner M. Bone morphing with statistical shape models for enhanced visualization. Medical Imaging 2004: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display 2004, SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, p. 122-30. 1st ed.
19. Hraiech N., Taddei F., Malvesin E., Rochette M., Viceconti M. Fast 3D mesh generation of femur based on planar parameterization and morphing. 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008. ISBI 2008, 1561-1564.
20. Bishop C.M. Pattern recognition and machine learning 2006, Springer, p. 740.
21. Hraiech N., Rochette M., Taddei F., Viceconti M. Finite element femur generation using morphing and spherical parameterization techniques. Book of Abstracts: IV International Congress on Computational Bioengineering including the first European Symposium on Biomedical Integrative Research: DEIS, Alma Mater Studiorum 2009, 27.
22. Yoo D.-J. Three-dimensional morphing of similar shapes using a template mesh. Int J Precision Eng Manuf 2009, 10:55-66.
23. Taosong H., Wang S., Kaufman A. Wavelet-based volume morphing. IEEE Conference on Visualization, 1994, Visualization '94 Proceedings 1994, 85-92. CP8.
24. Athanasiadis T., Fudos I., Christophoros N., Vasiliki S. Feature-based 3D morphing based on geometrically constrained sphere mapping optimization. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2010, ACM, Sierre, Switzerland.
25. Lin L., Lee C., Lee T.-Y. Distributed volume morphing. Cluster Comput 1999, 2:219-227.
26. Pettersson J., Borga M., Andersson M., Knutsson H. Volume morphing for segmentation of bone from 3D data. Symposium on Image Analysis SSBA 2005.
27. Viceconti M., Taddei F. Automatic generation of finite element meshes from computed tomography data. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2003, 31:27-72.
28. Carr J., Beatson R., Cherrie J., Mitchell T., Fright R., McCallum B., et al. Reconstruction and representation of 3D objects with radial basis functions. SIGGRAPH 2001, Computer Graphics Proceedings 2001, 67-76. ACM Press/ACM SIGGRAPH. E. Fiume (Ed.).
29. Arad N., Dyn N., Reisfeld D., Yeshurun Y. Image warping by radial basis functions: applications to facial expressions. CVGIP: Graph. Models Image Process 1994, 56:161-172.
30. Taddei F., Martelli S., Reggiani B., Cristofolini L., Viceconti M. Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006, 53:2194-2200.
31. Viceconti M., Lattanzi R., Antonietti B., Paderni S., Olmi R., Sudanese A., et al. CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med Eng Phys 2003, 25:371-377.
32. Viceconti M., Taddei F., Montanari L., Testi D., Leardini A., Clapworthy G., et al. Multimod data manager: a tool for data fusion. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2007, 87:148-159.
33. Cristofolini L. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1997, 25:409-483.
34. Ruff C.B., Hayes W.C. Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae-a biomechanical investigation. II. Sex, age, side differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 1983, 60:383-400.
35. Noble P.C., Box G.G., Kamaric E., Fink M.J., Alexander J.W., Tullos H.S. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 31-44.
36. Murphy S.B., Simon S.R., Kijewski P.K., Wilkinson R.H., Griscom N.T. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987, 69:1169-1176.
37. Schileo E., Dall'ara E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Schotkamp T., Baleani M., et al. An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. J Biomech 2008, 41:2483-2491.
38. Morgan E.F., Bayraktar H.H., Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 2003, 36:897-904.
39. Allemang R.J., Brown D.L. A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. International Modal Analysis Conference 1982, 110-116.
40. Vollmer J., Mencl R., uuml ller H. Improved Laplacian smoothing of noisy surface meshes. Comput Graph Forum 1999, 18:131-138.
41. Bah M.T., Nair P.B., Browne M. Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31:1235-1243.