Synergy of empirical breeding, marker-assisted selection, and genomics to increase crop yield potential

Crop Science

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1571-1583

  Stuber, Charles W ^a   Polacco, Mary ^b   Senior, M Lynn ^c  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c JEALOTT S HILL RESEARCH STATION   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC IMPROVEMENT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; HETEROSIS; HYBRID; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT YIELD; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0033371127     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1999.3961571x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. Abler, B.S.B., M.D. Edwards, and C.W. Stuber. 1991. Isoenzymatic identification of quantitative trait loci in crosses of elite maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 31:267-274.
2. Ahn, S., J.A. Anderson, M.E. Sorrells, and S.D. Tanksley. 1993. Homeologous relationships of rice, wheat and maize chromosomes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241:483-490.
3. Ahn, S., and S. Tanksley. 1993. Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 90:7980-7984.
4. Alpert, K.B., and S.D. Tanksley. 1996. High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: A major fruit weight quantitative trait locus in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 93:15503-15507.
5. Beckmann, J.S., and M. Soller. 1986. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in plant genetic improvement. Oxford Surv. Plant Mol. Cell Biol. 3:197-250.
6. Bennett, M.D., A.V. Cox, and Leitch. 1997. Angiosperm DNA C-values database, http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval/ (verified June 2, 1999).
7. Bernardo, R. 1994. Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci. 34:20-25.
8. Brown, A.H.D., J. Munday, and R.N. Oram. 1989. Use of isozyme-marked segments from wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) in barley breeding. Plant Breed. 100:280-288.
9. Bubeck, D.M., M.M. Goodman, W.D. Beavis, and D. Grant. 1993. Quantitative trait loci controlling resistance to gray leaf spot in maize. Crop Sci. 33:838-847.
10. Burow, M.D., and T.K. Blake. 1998. Molecular tools for the study of complex traits, p. 13-29. In A.H. Paterson (ed.) Molecular dissection of complex traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
11. Byrne, P.P., M.D. McMullen, M.E. Snook, T.A. Musket, J.M. Theuri, N.W. Widstrom, B.R. Wiseman, and E.H. Coe. 1996. Quantitative trait loci and metabolic pathways: Genetic control of the concentration of maysin, a corn earworm resistance factor, in maize silks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 93:8820-8825.
12. Chen, M., P. SanMiguel, A.C. de Oliviera, S.-S. Woo, H. Shang, R.A. Wing, and J.L. Bennetzen. 1997. Microcolinearity in shehomologous regions of the maize, rice and sorghum genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 94:3431-3435.
13. Coe, E.H., M.L. Polacco, M.D. McMullen, and G.D. Davis. 1999. Maize molecular maps: Markers, bins and databases. In R. Phillips and I. Vasil (ed.) DNA-based markers in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, the Netherlands (in press).
14. Cox, D.R., M.N. Burmeister, E.R. Price, S. Kim, and R.M. Myers. 1990. Radiation hybrid mapping: a somatic cell genetic method for constructing high-resolution maps of mammalian chromosome. Science 250:245-250.
15. Comstock, R. 1978. Quanlitative genetics in maize breeding, p. 191-206. In D. Walden (ed.) Maize breeding and genetics. Wiley, New York.
16. Darrah, L.L., and A.R. Hallauer. 1972. Genetic effects estimated from generation means in four diallel sets of maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 12:615-621.
17. Doebley, J., A. Stec., and L. Hubbard. 1997. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485-488.
18. Dudley, J.W., M.A. Saghai Maroof, and G.K. Rufener. 1992. Molecular marker information and selection of parents in corn breeding programs. Crop Sci. 32:301-304.
19. Duvick, D.N. 1997. What is yield? p. 332-335. In G.O. Edmeades et al. (ed.) Proc. of Symposium on Developing Drought- and Low N-Tolerant Maize. CIMMYT. El Batan. Mexico.
20. Eathington, S.R., J.W. Dudley, and G.K. Rufener. 1997. Marker effects estimated from testcrosses of early and late generations of inbreeding in maize. Crop Sci. 37:1679-1685.
21. Edwards, M.D., T. Helentjaris, S. Wright, and C.W. Stuber. 1992. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: IV. Analysis based on genome saturation with isozyme and restriction fragment length polymorphism markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:765-774.
22. Edwards, M., and L. Johnson. 1994. RFLPs for rapid recurrent selection, p. 33-40. In Proc. of Symposium on Analysis of Molecular Marker Data. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. and CSSA. Corvallis, OR.
23. Edwards, M.D., C.W. Stuber, and J.F. Wendel. 1987. Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116:113-125.
24. Eshed, Y., and D. Zamir. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and line mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
25. Faris, J.D., W.L. Li, D.J. Liu, P.D. Chen, and B.S. Gill. 1999. Candidate gene analysis of quantitative disease resistance in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:219-225.
26. Furbeck, S.M. 1993. The development and evaluation of molecular-marker derived near isogenic lines to study quantitative traits in maize. Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University. Raleigh (Diss. Abstr. DA9330287).
27. Gale, M.D., and K.M. Devos. 1998. Plant comparative genetics after 10 years. Science 282:656-659.
28. Gimelfarb, A., and R. Lande. 1994a. Simulation of marker-assisted selection in hybrid populations. Genet. Res. 63:39-47.
29. Gimelfarb, A., and R. Lande. 1994b. Simulation of marker-assisted selection for non-additive traits. Genet. Res. 64:127-136.
30. Gimelfarb, A., and R. Lande. 1995. Marker-assisted selection and marker-QTL associations in hybrid populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:522-528.
31. Graham, G.I., D.W. Wolff, and C.W. Stuber. 1997. Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci. 37:1601-1610.
32. Han, F., A. Kleinhofs, S.E. Ullrich, A. Kilian, M. Yano, and T. Sasaki. 1998. Synteny with rice: analysis of barley malting quality QTLs and rpg4 chromosome regions. Genome 41:373-380.
33. Hospital, F., L. Moreau, F. Lacoudre, A. Charcosset, and A. Gallais. 1997. More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:1181-1189.
34. Johnson, G.R., and R.H. Mumm. 1996. Marker assisted maize breeding. Proc. 51st Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conf., American Seed Trade Assoc. 51:75-84.
35. Kearsey, M.J., and A.G.L. Farquhar. 1998. QTL analysis in plants: where are we now? Heredity 80:137-142.
36. Knapp, S.J. 1994. Mapping quantitative trait loci. p. 58-96. In R. Phillips and I. Vasil (ed.) DNA-based markers in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
37. Knapp, S.J. 1998. Marker-assisted selection as a strategy for increasing the probability of selecting superior genotypes. Crop Sci. 38: 1164-1174.
38. Koester, R.P. 1992. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling maturity and plant height using molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.) Ph.D. thesis (Diss. Abstr. AAI9221518). North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
39. Koester, R.P., P.H. Sisco, and C.W. Stuber. 1993. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling days to flowering and plant height in two near isogenic lines of maize. Crop Sci. 33:1209-1216.
40. Kurata, N., G. Moore, Y. Nagamura, T. Foote, M. Yana, Y. Minobe, and M.D. Gale. 1994. Conservation of genome structure between rice and wheat. Bio/Technology 12:276-278.
41. National Academy of Sciences. 1998. June 1997, Irvine CA, Colloquium, Protecting our food supply: The value of plant genome initiatives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 95:1969-2032.
42. Lande, R., and R. Thompson. 1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743-756.
43. LeDeaux, J.R., and C.W. Stuber. 1997. Mapping heterosis QTLs in maize grown under various stress conditions. Symposium on the Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. Abstracts, p. 40-41.
44. Li, Z., S.R.M. Pinson, W.D. Park, A.H. Paterson, and J.W. Stansel. 1997. Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 145:453-465.
45. Melchinger, A.E., M. Lee, K.R. Lamkey, and W.L. Woodman. 1990. Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms: Relation to estimated effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 30: 1033-1040.
46. Paterson, A.H. 1998a. High resolution mapping of QTLs. p. 163-173. In A.H. Paterson (ed.) Molecular dissection of complex traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
47. Paterson, A.H. 1998b. Prospects for cloning the genetic determinants of QTLs. p. 289-293. In A.H. Paterson (ed.) Molecular dissection of complex traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
48. Paterson, A.M., J.W. Deverna, B. Lanini, and S.D. Tanksley. 1990. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124:735-742.
49. Paterson, A.H., S. Damon, J.D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H.D. Rabinowitch. S. E. Lincoln, E.S. Lander, and S.D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato. Comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127:181-197.
50. Peng, J.Y., J.C. Glaszmann, and S.S. Virmani. 1988. Heterosis and isozyme divergence in indica rice. Crop Sci. 28:561-563.
51. Pereira, M.G., and M. Lee. 1995. Identification of genomic regions affecting plant height in sorghum and maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:380-388.
52. Ragot, M., P.H. Sisco, D.A. Hoisington, and C.W. Stuber. 1995. Molecular-marker-mediated characterization of favorable exotic alleles at quantitative trait loci in maize. Crop Sci. 35:1306-1315
53. Rector, B.C., J.N. All, W.A. Parrott, and H.R. Boerma. 1998. Identification of molecular markers linked to quantitative trait loci for soybean resistance to corn earworm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 786-790.
54. Rector, B.G., J.N. All, W.A. Parrott, and H.R. Boerma. 1999. Quanti-tative trait loci for antixenosis to corn earworm in soybean. Crop Sci. 39:531-538.
55. Smith, J.S.C., and O.S. Smith. 1989. The use of morphological, biochemical, and genetic characteristics to measure distance and to test for minimum distance between inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) (Mimeo of paper presented at UPOV Workshop, Versailles, France, October 1989). Pioneer Hi-Bred International. Inc., Johnston, IA.
56. Stuber, C.W. 1992. Biochemical and molecular markers in plant breed-ing. In J. Janick (ed.) Plant Breeding Reviews 9:37-61.
57. Stuber, C.W. 1994. Success in the use of molecular markers for yield enhancement in corn. Proc. 49th Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Res. Conf., American Seed Trade Assoc. 49:232-238.
58. Stuber, C.W. 1995. Mapping and manipulating quantitative traits in maize. Trends in Genetics 11:477-481.
59. Stuber, C.W. 1999. Breeding multigenic traits. In R. Phillips and I. Vasil (ed.) DNA-based markers in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (in press).
60. Stuber, C.W. 1998. Case history in crop improvement: Yield heterosis in maize, p. 197-206. In A.H. Paterson (ed.). Molecular Analysis of Complex Traits. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.
61. Stuber, C.W., and M.D. Edwards. 1986. Genotypic selection for improvement of quantitative traits in corn using molecular marker loci. Proc. 41st Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Res. Conf., American Seed Trade Assoc. 41:70-83.
62. Stuber, C.W., M.D. Edwards, and J.F. Wendel. 1987. Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: II. Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci. 27:639-648.
63. Stuber, C.W., G. Graham, and M.L. Senior. 1996. Effects of environmental stresses on mapping heterosis QTLs in maize. Plant Genome IV Abstr. p. 23.
64. Stuber, C.W., S.E. Lincoln, D.W. Wolff, T. Helentjaris, and E.S. Lander. 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823-839.
65. Stuber, C.W., and P.H. Sisco. 1991. Marker-facilitated transfer of QTL alleles between elite inbred lines and responses in hybrids. Proc. 46th Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Res. Conf., American Seed Trade Assoc. 46:104-113.
66. Tanksley, S.D., and J. Hewitt. 1988. Use of molecular markers in breeding for soluble solids content in tomato - a re-examination. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:811-823.
67. Tanksley, S.D., and J.C. Nelson. 1996. Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:191-203.
68. Van Deyne, A.E., J.C. Nelson, S.E. Harrington, E.S. Yglesias, D. Braga, S.R. McCouch, and M.E. Sorrells. 1995. Comparative mapping in grasses. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:744-754.
69. Wittaker, J.C., R.N. Curnow, C.S. Haley, and R. Thompson. 1995. Using marker-maps in marker-assisted selection. Genet. Res. 66: 255-265.
70. Yamamoto, T., Y. Kuboki, S.Y. Lin, T. Sasaki, and M. Yano. 1998. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci Hd-1, Hd-2 and Hti-3, controlling heading date of rice, as single Mendelian factors. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:37-44.
71. Zhang, W., and C. Smith. 1992. Computer simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:813-820.
72. Zhang, W., and C. Smith. 1993. Simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium: the effects of several additional factors. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:492-496.