Preoperative candidate evaluations for retinal prosthesis trials

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 844-850

  Xia, Yu ^a   Ren, Qiushi ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Psychological evaluations; Psychophysics; Rehabilitation; Retinal prosthesis

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PROSTHETICS;

CANDIDATE SELECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; FUNCTION TESTS; PROSTHETIC DEVICES; PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION; RETINAL PROSTHESIS; RETINAL PROSTHETICS; SELECTION CRITERIA; VISUAL FUNCTIONS;

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;

COGNITION; EXPECTATION; FUNCTION TEST; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETINA; REVIEW; VISION;

EID: 78650841058     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039139881003301202     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Berson EL. Retinitis pigmentosa: unfolding its mystery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 4526-8.
2. Joffe L. The medical and surgical management of ARMD. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1996; 36: 99-116.
3. Delbeke J, Pins D, Michaux G, Wanet-Defalque M, Parrini S, Veraart C. Electrical stimulation of anterior visual pathways in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 291-7. (Pubitemid 32059443)
4. Chow AY, Chow V, Packo K, Pollack J, Peyman G, Schuchard R. The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 460-9. (Pubitemid 38456280)
5. Rizzo JF, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 5362-9.
6. Humayun MS, Weiland J, Fujii G, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 2003; 43: 2573-81.
7. Merabet LB, Joseph F III, Pascual-Leone A, Fernandez E. 'Who is the ideal candidate?': decisions and issues relating to visual neuroprosthesis development, patient testing and neuroplasticity. J Neural Eng 2007; 4: S130-5.
8. Dagnelie G. Psychophysical evaluation for visual prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2008; 10: 339-68.
9. Colby KA, Chang D, Stulting R, Lane S. Surgical placement of an optical prosthetic device for end-stage macular degeneration: The implantable miniature telescope. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125: 1118-21. (Pubitemid 47258046)
10. Davis PC, Hopkins K. Imaging of the pediatric orbit and visual pathways: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1999; 9: 93-114.
11. Witkin AJ, Ko T, Fujimoto J, et al. Ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography assessment of photoreceptors in retinitis pigmentosa and related diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142: 945-52.
12. Merabet LB, Theoret H. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an investigative tool in the study of visual function. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 356-68.
13. Herse P. Retinitis pigmentosa: visual function and multidisciplinary management. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 335-50.
14. Fishman GA, Jacobson S, Alexander K, et al. Outcome measures and their application in clinical trials for retinal degenerative diseases: outline, review, and perspective. Retina 2005; 25: 772-7.
15. Tamai M, Kunikata H, Itabashi T, et al. An instrument capable of grading visual function: results from patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Tohoku J Exp Med 2004; 203: 305-12.
16. Roman A, Cideciyan A, Aleman T, Jacobson S. Full-field stimulus testing (FST) to quantify visual perception in severely blind candidates for treatment trials. Physiol Meas 2007; 28: N51-6. (Pubitemid 47421730)
17. Kiser AK, Mladenovich D, Eshraghi F, Bourdeau D, Dagnelie G. Reliability and consistency of dark-adapted psychophysical measures in advanced eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 444-52.
18. Harding GF, Odom J, Spileers W, Spekreijse H. Standard for visual evoked potentials 1995. The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Vision Res 1996; 36: 3567-72.
19. Marmor MF, Hood D, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger M, Miyake Y. Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 2003; 106: 105-15.
20. Yanai D, Lakhanpal R, Weiland J, et al. The value of preoperative tests in the selection of blind patients for a permanent microelectronic implant. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2003; 101: 223-8.
21. Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Dagnelie G, Greenberg R, Propst R, Phillips D. Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 40-6.
22. Gekeler F, Messias A, Ottinger M, Bartz-Schmidt K, Zrenner E. Phosphenes electrically evoked with DTL electrodes: a study in patients with retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma, and homonymous visual field loss and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4966-74.
23. Haymes SA, Johnston A, Heyes A. Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 79-91.
24. Latham K, Usherwood C. Assessing visual activities of daily living in the visually impaired. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 55-65.
25. Turano KA, Geruschat D, Stahl J, Massof R. Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 865-77.
26. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Sloane M, Stalvey B, Wells J. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to visual function in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 350-9.
27. Turano KA, Massof R, Quigley H. A self-assessment instrument designed for measuring independent mobility in RP patients: generalizability to glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2874-81.
28. Pollard R. Conceptualizing and conducting preoperative psychological assessments of cochlear implant candidates. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1996; 1: 16-28.
29. Leinhaas MA, Hedstrom N. Low vision: how to assess and treat its emotional impact. Geriatrics 1994; 49: 53-6.
30. Chader GJ, Weiland J, Humayun M. Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis. Prog Brain Res 2009; 175: 317-32.
31. Knutson JF, Johnson A, Murray K. Social and emotional characteristics of adults seeking a cochlear implant and their spouses. Br J Health Psychol 2006; 11(Pt 2): 279-92.
32. Tolman J, Hill R, Kleinschmidt J, Gregg C. Psychosocial adaptation to visual impairment and its relationship to depressive affect in older adults with age-related macular degeneration. Gerontologist 2005; 45: 747-53. (Pubitemid 41759780)
33. Owsley C, Sloane M, McGwin C, Ball J. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: Relationship to cognitive function and everyday performance assessments in older adults. Gerontology 2002; 48: 254-65.
34. Veraart C, Duret F, Brelen M, Oozeer M, Delbeke J. Vision rehabilitation in the case of blindness. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004; 1: 139-53.
35. Finkelstein D, Feinberg S, Flom R, et al. Visual prostheses and visual rehabilitation in low vision research, assessment, and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1991; 2: 729-32.
36. Leat SJ, Lovie-Kitchin J. Measuring mobility performance: experience gained in designing a mobility course. Clin Exp Optom 2006; 89: 215-28.