Mining flexible-receptor docking experiments to select promising protein receptor snapshots

BMC Genomics

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2010, Pages

  Machado, Karina S ^a   Winck, Ana T ^a   Ruiz, Duncan D A ^a   Norberto de Souza, Osmar ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; INHA PROTEIN, MYCOBACTERIUM; LIGAND; OXIDOREDUCTASE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA MINING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DRUG DESIGN; METABOLISM;

MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; OXIDOREDUCTASES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 78650813408     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-S5-S6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Lyne PD. Structure-based Virtual Screening: an Overview. Drug Discov Today 2002, 7:1047-1055.
2. Caskey CT. The Drug Development Crisis: Efficiency and Safety. Annu Rev Med 2007, 58:1-16.
3. Lybrand TP. Ligand-protein Docking and Rational Drug Design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5:224-228.
4. Kuntz ID. Structure-based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery. Science 1992, 257:1078-1082.
5. Huang S, Zou X. Emsemble Docking of Multiple Protein Structures: Considering Protein Structural Variations in Molecular Docking. Proteins 2007, 66:399-421.
6. Cozzini P, Kellogg GE, Spyrakis F, Abraham DJ, Constantino G, Emerson A, Fanelli F, Gohlke H, Kuhn LA, Morris GM, Orozco M, Pertinhez TA, Rizzi M, Sotriffer CA. Target Flexibility: An Emerging Consideration in Drug Discovery and Design. J Med Chem 2008, 51:6237-6255. 2701403, 18785728.
7. Verkhivker GM, Bouzida D, Gehlhaar DK, Rejto PA, Freer ST, Rose PW. Complexity and Simplicity of Ligand-macromolecule Interactions: The Energy Landscape Perspective. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002, 12:197-203.
8. Teodoro ML, Kavraki LE. Conformational Flexibility Models for the Receptor in Structure Based Drug Design. Curr Pharm Des 2003, 9:1419-1431.
9. Totrov M, Abagyan R. Flexible Ligand Docking to Multiple Receptor Conformations: a Practical Alternative. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008, 18:178-184. 2396190, 18302984.
10. Wong CF. Flexible Ligand-Flexible Protein Docking in Protein Kinase Systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008, 1784:244-251.
11. Alonso H, Bliznyuk AA, Gready JE. Combining Docking and Molecular Dynamic Simulations in Drug Design. Med Res Rev 2006, 26:531-568.
12. Chandrika B, Subramanian J, Sharma SD. Managing Protein Flexibility in Docking and its Applications. Drug Discov Today 2009, 14:394-400.
13. Jiang F, Kim S-H. Soft Docking: Matching of Molecular Surface Cubes. J Mol Biol 1991, 219:79-102.
14. Apostolakis J, Plückthun A, Caflisch A. Docking Small Ligands in Flexible Binding Sites. J Comput Chem 1998, 19:21-37.
15. Leach AR. Ligand Docking to Proteins with Discrete Side-chain Flexibility. J Mol Biol 1994, 235:345-356.
16. Althus E, Kohlbacher O, Lenhof HP, Muller P. A Combinatorial Approach to Protein Docking with Flexible Side Chains. J Comput Biol 2002, 9:597-612.
17. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and Validation of a Genetic Algorithm for Flexible Docking. J Mol Biol 1997, 267:727-748.
18. Knegtel RMA, Kuntz ID, Oshiro CM. Molecular Docking to Ensembles of Protein Structures. J Mol Biol 1997, 266:424-440.
19. Österberg F, Morris GM, Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS. Automated Docking to Multiple Target Structures: Incorporation of Protein Mobility and Structural Water Heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins 2002, 46:34-40.
20. Pang Y-P, Kozikowski AP. Prediction of the Binding Sites of Huperzine A in Acetylcholinesterase by Docking Studies. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8:669-681.
21. Lin J-H, Perryman AL, Schames JR, McCammon JA. Computational Drug Design Accommodating Receptor Flexibility: the Relaxed Complex Scheme. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124:5632-5633.
22. Lin J-H, Perryman AL, Schames JR, McCammon JA. The Relaxed Complex Method: Accommodating Receptor Flexibility for Drug Design with an Improved Scoring Scheme. Biopolymers 2003, 68:47-62.
23. Amaro RE, Baron R, McCammon JA. An Improved Relaxed Complex Scheme for Receptor Flexibility in Computer-aided Drug Design. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2008, 22:693-705. 2516539, 18196463.
24. Machado KS, Schroeder EK, Ruiz DD, Norberto de Souza O. Automating Molecular Docking with Explicit Receptor Flexibility Using Scientific Workflows. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2007, 4643:1-11.
25. Dessen A, Quémard A, Blanchard JS, Jacobs WR, Sacchettini JC. Crystal Structure and Function of the Isoniazid Target of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 1995, 267:1638-1641.
26. Oliveira JS, Sousa ESH, Norberto de Souza O, Moreira IS, Santos DS, Basso LA. Slow-onset Inhibition of 2-trans-Enoyl ACP (CoA) Reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis by an Inorganic Complex. Curr Pharm Des 2006, 12:2409-2424. 16842188.
27. World Health Organization Gender and Tuberculosis. WHO Report 2002 2002, World Health Organization.
28. World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis Control: Surveillance. Planning. Financing. 2009, WHO Report 2009, World Health Organization.
29. Kruh NA, Rawat R, Ruzsicska BP, Tonge PJ. Probing Mechanisms of Resistance to the Tuberculosis Drug Isoniazid: Conformational Changes Caused by Inhibition of InhA, the Enoyl Reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Protein Sci 2007, 16:1617-1627. 2203378, 17600151.
30. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:235-242. 102472, 10592235.
31. Schroeder EK, Basso LA, Santos DS, Norberto de Souza O. Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of the Wild-Type, I21V, and I16T Mutants of Isoniazid-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Enoyl Reductase (InhA) in Complex with NADH: Toward the Understanding of NADH-InhA Different Affinities. Biophys J 2005, 89:876-884. 1366637, 15908576.
32. Kuo MR, Morbidoni HR, Alland D, Sneddon SF, Gourlie BB, Staveski MM, Leonard M, Gregory JS, Janjigian AD, Yee C, Musser JM, Kreiswirth B, Iwamoto H, Perozzo R, Jacobs WR, Sacchettini JC, Fidock DA. Targeting Tuberculosis and Malaria Through Inhibition of Enoyl Reductase: Compound Activity and Structural Data. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:20851-20859.
33. Oliveira JS, Sousa EHS, Basso LA, Palaci M, Dietze R, Santos DS, Moreira IS. An Inorganic Iron Complex that Inhibits Wild-type and an Isoniazid-Resistant Mutant 2-trans-enoyl-ACP (CoA) Reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Chem Commun 2004, 3:312-313.
34. Wang F, Langley R, Gulten G, Dover LG, Besra GS, Jacobs WR, Sacchettini JC. Mechanism of Thioamide Drug Action Against Tuberculosis and Leprosy. J Exp Med 2007, 204:73-78. 2118422, 17227913.
35. Irwin JJ, Shoichet B. ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. J Chem Inf Model 2005, 45:177-182. 1360656, 15667143.
36. Winck AT, Machado KS, Norberto de Souza O, Ruiz DD. FReDD: Supporting Mining Strategies Through a Flexible-receptor Docking Database. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009, 5676:143-146.
37. Quinlan JR. Learning with Continuous Classes. Proceedings of the Fifith Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Singapore: World Scientific 1992, 343-348.
38. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated Docking Using a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and Empirical Binding Free Energy Function. J Comput Chem 1998, 19:1639-1662.
39. Han J, Kamber M. Data mining: concepts and techniques. 2006, San Francisco: Morgan & Kaufmann.
40. Freitas AA, Wieser DC, Apweiler R. On the Importance of Comprehensible Classification Models for Protein Function Prediction. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2010, 99:172-182. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform.
41. Wang Y, Witten IH. Inducing Model Trees for Continuous Classes. Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Machine Learning 1997, 128-137.
42. Witten IH, Frank E. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2005, San Francisco: Morgan & Kaufmann.
43. Case DA, Cheatham-III TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Onufriev A, Simmerling N, Wang B, Woods R. The AMBER Biomolecular Simulation Programs. J Comput Chem 2005, 26:1668-1688. 1989667, 16200636.
44. Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Kumar V. Introduction to data mining. 2006, Boston: Addison Wesley.
45. Jeffrey GA. An introduction to hydrogen bonding. 1997, UK: Oxford University Press.
46. da Silveira CH, Pires DEV, Minardi RC, Ribeiro C, Veloso CJM, Lopes JCD, Meira W, Neshich G, Ramos CHI, Habesch R, Santoro MM. Protein Cutoff Scanning: A comparative Analysis of Cutoff Dependent and Cutoff Free Methods for Prospecting Contacts in Proteins. Proteins 2009, 74:727-743.