Unimodal and crossmodal working memory representations of visual and kinesthetic movement trajectories

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 52-59

  Seemüller, Anna ^a   Fiehler, Katja ^a   Rösler, Frank ^a,b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

2300; 2320; 2343; Dual task interference; Haptics; Kinesthetic representations; Vision; Visual representations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650810275     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amedi A., Jacobson G., Hendler T., Malach R., Zohary E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex 2002, 12:1202-1212.
2. Amedi A., Malach R., Hendler T., Peled S., Zohary E. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(3):324-330.
3. Baddeley A.D., Lieberman K. Spatial working memory. Attention and performance 1980, Vol. VIII:521-539. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Cattaneo Z., Vecchi T. Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:631-642.
5. Chieffi S., Allport D.A. Independent coding of target distance and direction in visuo-spatial working memory. Psychological Research 1997, 60:244-250.
6. Chieffi S., Allport D.A., Woodin M. Hand-centered coding of target location in visuo-spatial working memory. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:495-502.
7. Classen J., Gerloff C., Honda M., Hallett M. Integrative visuomotor behavior is associated with interregionally coherent oscillations in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:1567-1573.
8. Connolly K., Jones B. A developmental study of afferent-reafferent integration. British Journal of Psychology 1970, 61(2):259-266.
9. D'Esposito M. From cognitive to neural models of working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B Biological Sciences 2007, 362:761-772.
10. Desmurget M., Vindras P., Gréa H., Viviani P., Grafton S.T. Proprioception does not quickly drift durino visual occlusion. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134:363-377.
11. Easton R.D., Greene A.J., Srinivas K. Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4(3):403-410.
12. Ernst M.O., Lange C., Newell F.N. Multisensory recognition of actively explored objects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 61(3):242-253.
13. Freides D. Human information processing and sensory modality: Cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit. Psychological Bulletin 1974, 81(5):284-310.
14. Gallace A., Spence C. The cognitive and neural correlates of tactile memory. Psychological Bulletin 2009, 135:380-406.
15. Garvill J., Molander B. Effects of standard modality, comparison modality and retention interval on matching form. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1973, 14:203-206.
16. Gibson J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems 1966, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
17. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research 2001, 41:1409-1422.
18. Hummel F., Gerloff C. Larger interregional synchrony is associated with greater behavioral success in a complex sensory integration task in humans. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:670-678.
19. Ittyerah M., Marks L.E. Memory for curvature of objects: Haptic touch vs. vision. British Journal of Psychology 2007, 98:589-610.
20. James T.W., Humphrey G.K., Gati J.S., Servos P., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:1706-1714.
21. Jolicoeur P., Dell'Acqua R. The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36:138-202.
22. Kiphart M.J., Hughes J.L., Simmons J.P., Cross H.A. Short-term haptic memory for complex objects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1992, 30:212-214.
23. Klauer K.C., Zhao Z. Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 133(3):355-381.
24. Kriegeskorte N., Sorger B., Naumer M., Schwarzbach J., van den Boogert E., Hussy W., et al. Human cortical object recognition from a visual motion flowfield. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23:1451-1463.
25. Lacey S., Campbell C. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: Evidence from interference effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:361-376.
26. Lacey S., Tal N., Amedi A., Sathian K. A putative model of multisensory object representation. Brain Topography 2009, 21:269-274.
27. Logie R.H. Visuo-spatial processing in working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1986, 38A(2):229-247.
28. Logie R.H., Marchetti C. Visuo-spatial working memory: Visual, spatial or central executive?. Mental images in human cognition 1991, 105-115. Elsevier, New York. R.H. Logie, M. Denis (Eds.).
29. Loomis J.M., Klatzky R.L., Lederman S.J. Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 1991, 20:167-177.
30. Martenuik R.G., Rodney M. Modality and retention effects in intra- and cross-modal judgements of kinaesthetic and visual information. British Journal of Psychology 1979, 70:405-412.
31. McCloseky D.I. Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiological Reviews 1978, 58(4):763-820.
32. Millar S. Effects of interpolated tasks on latency and accuracy of intramodal and cross-modal shape recognition by children. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 96:170-175.
33. Millar S. Tactile short-term memory by blind and sighted children. British Journal of Psychology 1974, 65(2):253-263.
34. Newell K.M., Shapiro D.C., Carlton M.J. Coordinating visual and kinaesthetic memory codes. British Journal of Psychology 1979, 70:87-96.
35. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
36. Posner M.I. Characteristics of visual and kinesthetic memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1967, 75(1):103-107.
37. Posner M.I., Nissen M.J., Klein R.M. Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review 1976, 83(2):157-171.
38. Possin K.L., Filoteo J.V., Song D.D., Salmon D.P. Spatial and object working memory deficits in Parkinson's disease are due to impairment in different underlying processes. Neuropsychology 2008, 22(5):585-595.
39. Ranganath C. Working memory for visual objects: Complementary roles of inferior temporal, medial temporal, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 2006, 139:277-289.
40. Reales J.M., Ballesteros S. Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25(3):644-663.
41. Rock I., Victor J. Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 1964, 143:594-596.
42. Schiffman H.R. Somesthesis I: Kinesthesis and cutaneous sense. Sensation and perception: An integrated approach 1990, 119-138. John Wiley & Sons, New York. H.R. Schiffman (Ed.).
43. Smyth M.M. Memory for movements. The psychology of movement 1984, 83-117. Academic Press, London. M.M. Smyth, A.M. Wing (Eds.).
44. Struiksma M.E., Noordzij M.L., Postma A. What is the link between language and spatial images? Behavioral and neural findings in blind and sighted individuals. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:145-156.
45. Woods A.T., Newell F.N. Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2004, 98:147-159.
46. Woods A.T., O'Modhrain S., Newell F.N. The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4(2):260-269.