Supramodality Effects in Visual and Haptic Spatial Processes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 631-642

  Cattaneo, Zaira ^a   Vecchi, Tomaso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

haptic processes; spatial processes; supramodality; working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; ORIENTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TOUCH; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 43549113820     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.631     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Amedi A., Jacobson G., Hendler T., Malach R., and Zohary E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex 12 (2002) 1202-1212
2. Amedi A., Malach R., Hendler T., Peled S., and Zohari E. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 324-330
3. Ballesteros S., and Reales J.M. Intact haptic priming in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for dissociable memory systems. Neuropsychologia 42 (2004) 1063-1070
4. Ballesteros S., Reales J.M., and Mayas J. Picture priming in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Psichotema 19 (2007) 239-244
5. Bertelson P., and de Gelder B. The psychology of multimodal perception. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 141-177
6. Botvinick M., and Cohen J.D. Rubber hand "feels" what eyes see. Nature 391 (1998, February 19) 756
7. Bushnell E.W., and Baxt C. Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1867-1881
8. Cornoldi C., and Vecchi T. Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences (2003), Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom
9. Craver-Lemley C., and Reeves A. How visual imagery interferes with vision. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 633-649
10. Davidson P.W., Abbott S., and Gershenfeld J. Influence of exploration time on haptic and visual matching of complex shape. Perception and Psychophysics 15 (1974) 539-543
11. Deibert E., Kraut M., Kremen S., and Hart Jr. J. Neural pathways in tactile object recognition. Neurology 52 (1999) 1413-1417
12. Easton R.D., Greene A.J., and Srinivas K. Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4 (1997) 403-410
13. Easton R.D., Srinivas K., and Greene A.J. Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (1997) 153-163
14. Eimer M. Electrophysiology of human crossmodal spatial attention. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 221-245
15. Feron J., Gentaz E., and Streri A. Evidence of amodal representation of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-old infants. Cognitive Development 21 (2006) 81-92
16. Ganis G., Thompson W., and Kosslyn S.M. Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 20 (2004) 226-241
17. Grefkes C., Weiss P.H., Zilles K., and Fink G.R. Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: An fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 35 (2002) 173-184
18. Hadjikhani N., and Roland P.E. Cross-modal transfer of information between the tactile and the visual representations in the human brain: A positron emission tomographic study. Journal of Neuroscience 18 (1998) 1072-1084
19. Hale S., Myerson J., Rhee S.H., Weiss C.S., and Abrams R.A. Selective interference with the maintenance of location information in working memory. Neuropsychology 10 (1996) 228-240
20. Heller M.A. Haptic dominance in form perception: Vision versus proprioception. Perception 21 (1992) 655-660
21. Heller M.A. Touch, representation, and blindness (Debates in Psychology Series) (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
22. Heller M.A., Brackett D.D., Scroggs E., Steffen H., Heatherly K., and Salik S. Tangible pictures: Viewpoint effects and linear perspective in visually impaired people. Perception 31 (2002) 747-769
23. Irwin D.E., and Zelinsky G.J. Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception and Psychophysics 646 (2002) 882-895
24. James T.W., Humphrey G.K., Gati J.S., Servos P., Menon R.S., and Goodale M.A. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 1706-1714
25. James T.W., Kim S., and Fisher J.S. The neural basis of haptic object processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2007) 219-269
26. Johnson C.L., Paivio A.U., and Clark J.M. Spatial and verbal abilities in children's cross-modal recognition: A dual-coding approach. Canadian Journal of Psychology 43 (1989) 397-412
27. Kappers A.M.L. Large systematic deviations in the haptic perception of parallelity. Perception 28 (1999) 1001-1012
28. Lacey S., and Campbell C. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: Evidence from interference effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2006) 361-376
29. Lederman S.J., Summers C., and Klatzky R.L. Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception 25 (1996) 983-998
30. Lewkowicz D.J. Development of intersensory perception in human infants. In: Lewkowicz D.J., and Lickliter R. (Eds). The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (1994), Erlbaum, Hove, United Kingdom 165-203
31. Logie R.H. Visuo-spatial working memory (1995), Erlbaum, Hove, United Kingdom
32. Loomis J.M. Tactile pattern perception. Perception 10 (1981) 5-27
33. Loomis J.M. Analysis of haptic and visual confusion matrices. Perception & Psychophysics 31 (1982) 41-52
34. Newell F.N., Ernst M.O., Tjan B.S., and Bulthoff H.H. Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 37-42
35. Newell F.N., Woods A.T., Mernagh M., and Bülthoff H.H. Visual, haptic and crossmodal recognition of scenes. Experimental Brain Research 161 (2005) 233-242
36. Pavani F., Spence C., and Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 353-359
37. Pazzaglia F., and Cornoldi C. The role of distinct components of visuo-spatial working memory in the processing of texts. Memory 7 (1999) 19-41
38. Pick H.L., Warren D.H., and Hay J.C. Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Perception & Psychophysics 6 (1969) 203-205
39. Pietrini P., Furey M.L., Ricciardi E., Gobbini M.I., Wu W.H.C., Cohen L., et al. Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101 (2004) 5658-5663
40. Posner M.I., Nissen M.J., and Klein R.M. Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review 83 (1976) 157-171
41. Power R.P. The dominance of touch by vision: Occurs with familiar objects. Perception 10 (1981) 29-33
42. Pylyshyn Z.W. What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin 80 (1973) 1-24
43. Reales J.M., and Ballesteros S. Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 (1999) 644-663
44. Ricciardi E., Bonino D., Gentili C., Sani L., Pietrini P., and Vecchi T. Neural correlates of spatial working memory in humans: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study comparing visual and tactile processes. Neuroscience 139 (2006) 339-349
45. Rinck M., and Denis M. The metrics of spatial distance traversed during mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 1211-1218
46. Rock I., and Victor J. Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143 (1964, February 7) 594-596
47. Saito D.N., Okada T., Morita Y., Yonekura Y., and Sadato N. Tactile-visual cross-modal shape matching: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 14-25
48. Sathian K., Zangaladze A., Hoffman J., and Grafton S. Feeling with the mind's eye. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 3877-3881
49. Schroeder C.E., and Foxe J. Multisensory contributions to low-level, "unisensory" processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15 (2005) 454-458
50. Shimojo S., and Shams L. Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11 (2001) 505-509
51. Smyth M.M., and Scholey K.A. Interference in immediate spatial memory. Memory & Cognition 22 (1994) 1-13
52. Streri A., and Gentaz E. Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes in human newborns. Somatosensory and Motor Research 20 (2003) 13-18
53. Thinus-Blanc C., and Gaunet F. Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense?. Psychological Bulletin 121 (1997) 20-42
54. Vecchi T. Visuo-spatial limitations in congenitally totally blind people. Memory 6 (1998) 91-102
55. Vecchi T., Cattaneo Z., Monegato M., Pece A., Cornoldi C., and Pietrini P. Why Cyclops could not compete with Ulysses: Monocular vision and mental images. NeuroReport 17 (2006) 723-726
56. Vecchi T., Monticelli M.L., and Cornoldi C. Visuo-spatial working memory: Structures and variables affecting a capacity measure. Neuropsychologia 33 (1995) 1549-1564
57. Vecchi T., Tinti C., and Cornoldi C. Spatial memory and integration processes in congenital blindness. NeuroReport 15 (2004) 2787-2790
58. Walker-Andrews A.S. Taxonomy for intermodal relations. In: Lewkowicz D.J., and Lickliter R. (Eds). The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (1994), Erlbaum, Hove, United Kingdom 39-56
59. Welch R.B., and Warren D.H. Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin 68 (1980) 638-667
60. Wijntjes, M. W. A., van Lienen, T., Verstijnen, I. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (in press). The influence of picture size on recognition and exploratory behaviour in raised line drawing recognition. Perception
61. Zangaladze A., Epstein C., Grafton S., and Sathian K. Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature 401 (1999, October 7) 587-590
62. Zuidhoek S., Kappers A.M.L., Van der Lubbe R.H.J., and Postma A. Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task. Experimental Brain Research 149 (2003) 320-330