Parametric manipulation of the conflict signal and control-state adaptation

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 923-935

  Forster, Sarah E ^a   Carter, Cameron S ^b   Cohen, Jonathan D ^c   Cho, Raymond Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADJUSTMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; CONTROL STRATEGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650766109     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21458     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Switching intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2004). Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring; assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms. Neuron, 41, 473-487.
3. Beste, C., Saft, C., Andrich, J., Gold, R., & Falkenstein, M. (2008). Stimulus-response compatibility in Huntington's disease: A cognitive- neurophysiological analysis. Journal of Neurophysiology, 99, 1213-1223.
4. Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356-366.
5. Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
6. Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Yeung, N., Ullsperger, M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The conflict monitoring hypothesis: Computational and empirical investigations. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 91-102). New York: Guilford Publications.
7. Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179-181.
8. Brown, J., & Braver, T. (2005). Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science, 307, 1118-1121.
9. Brown, J., & Braver, T. (2007). Risk prediction and aversion by anterior cingulate cortex. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 266-277.
10. Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749. (Pubitemid 28243351)
11. Cho, R. Y., Orr, J. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2009). Generalized signaling for control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1161-1177.
12. Danielmeier, C., Wessel, J. R., Steinhauser, M., & Ullsperger, M. (2009). Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict. Psychophysiology, 46, 1288-1298.
13. Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007). Improved rejection of artifacts from EEG data using high-order statistics and independent component analysis. Neuroimage, 34, 1443-1449.
14. Durston, S., Davidson, M. C., Thomas, K. M., Worden, M. S., Tottenham, N., Martinez, A., et al. (2003). Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 20, 2135-2141.
15. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005a). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790.
16. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005b). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. Neuroimage, 24, 539-547.
17. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
18. Fan, J., Flombaum, J. I., McCandliss, B. D., Thomas, K. M., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage, 18, 42-57.
19. Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170.
20. Freitas, A. L., Banai, R., & Clark, S. L. (2009). When cognitive control is calibrated: Event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation. Psychophysiology, 46, 1-8.
21. Gajewski, P., Stoerig, P., & Falkenstein, M. (2008). ERP-correlates of response selection in a response conflict paradigm. Brain Research, 1189, 127-134.
22. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation and responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 480-506.
23. Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002, October). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679-709.
24. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
25. Iwaki, N., Miyatani, M.,&Toshima, T. (2003). A psychophysiological study on the function of the response-stop in the Eriksen task. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 100-108.
26. Jones, A. D., Cho, R. Y., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D., & Braver, T. S. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 300-317.
27. Kerns, J. G. (2006). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. Neuroimage, 33, 399-405.
28. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
29. Kopp, B., Mattler, U., Goertz, R., & Rist, F. (1996). N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 19-27.
30. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 356-367.
31. Ladouceur, C. D., Dahl, R. E., & Carter, C. S. (2007). Development of action monitoring through adolescence into adulthood: ERP and source localization. Developmental Science, 10, 874-891.
32. Larson, M. J., Kaufman, D. A., & Perlstein, W. M. (2009). Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 47, 663-670.
33. Liotti, M., Woldorff, M. G., Perez, R., III, & Mayberg, H. S. (2000). An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia, 38, 701-711.
34. Liston, C., Matalon, S., Hare, T., Davidson, M., & Casey, B. (2006). Anterior cingulate and posterior parietal cortices are sensitive to dissociable forms of conflict in a task-switching paradigm. Neuron, 50, 643-653.
35. MacDonald, A. W., III, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
36. Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2008). The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research, 73, 794-802.
37. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
38. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
39. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
40. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26.
41. Pardo, J. V., Fox, P., & Raichle, M. E. (1991). Localization of a system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature, 349, 61-64.
42. Posner, M. I., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neurosciences, 17, 75-79.
43. Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627-1631.
44. Rabbitt, P. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
45. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A.,&Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443-447.
46. Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. (2000). Performance monitoring in a confusing world: Error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 141-151.
47. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
48. Stürmer, B., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 35-44.
49. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroter, H.,& Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
50. Turken, A. S. D. (1999). Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 920-924. (Pubitemid 30602607)
51. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467-472.
52. van Veen, V. (2006). A neuroimaging approach to the relationship between attention and speed-accuracy tradeoff. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
53. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002a). The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 477-482.
54. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002b). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593-602. (Pubitemid 34553655)
55. Verbruggen, F., Notebaert, W., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 328-333. (Pubitemid 44412018)
56. Weissman, D. H., Gopalakrishnan, A., Hazlett, C. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2005). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex resolves conflict from distracting stimuli by boosting attention toward relevant events. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 229-237. (Pubitemid 40111083)
57. Wendt, M., Heldmann, M., Munte, T. F., & Kluwe, R. H. (2007). Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulus-response repetition using brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1104-1112. (Pubitemid 47026500)
58. Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 282-288.
59. Yeung, N., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The impact of cognitive deficits on conflict monitoring. Predictable dissociations between the error-related negativity and N2. Psychological Science, 17, 164-171.
60. Yeung, N., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 931-959.