Albedo hydrolysis modelling and digestion with reused effluents in the enzymatic peeling process of grapefruits

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 90, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 2433-2439

  Pagán, Axel ^a   Conde, Josep ^a   Ibarz, Albert ^a   Pagána, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Enzymes; Grapefruit; Optimisation; Peeling; Recovery

Indexed keywords

CELLULASE; POLYGALACTURONASE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FOOD HANDLING; FRUIT; GRAPEFRUIT; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; TEMPERATURE; TIME;

CELLULASE; CITRUS PARADISI; FOOD HANDLING; FRUIT; HYDROLYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYGALACTURONASE; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

CITRUS X PARADISI;

EID: 78650714550     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4103     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ben-Shalom M, Levi A and Pinto R, Pectolytic enzyme studies for peeling of grapefruit segment membrane. J Food Sci 51:421-423 (1986).
2. Bruemer JH and Griffin AW, Sectioning grapefruit by enzyme digestion. Fla St Hortic Soc 91:112-114 (1978).
3. Adams B and Kirk W, Process for enzyme peeling of fresh citrus fruit. U.S. Patent 5,000, 967 (1991).
4. Rouhana A and Mannheim CH, Optimization of enzymatic peeling of grapefruit. Lebensm-Wiss Technol 27:103-107 (1994).
5. Pretel MT, Fernández PS, Martínez A and Romojaro F, Modelling design of cuts for enzymatic peeling ofmandarin and optimization of different parameters of the process. Z Lebensm-Unters Forsch A 207:322-327 (1998).
6. Prakash S, Singhal RS and Kulkarni PR, Enzymic peeling of Indian grapefruit (Citrus paradisi). J Sci Food Agric 81:1440-1442 (2001).
7. Toker I and Bayindirli A, Enzymatic peeling of apricots, nectarines and peaches. Lebensm-Wiss Technol 36:215-221 (2003).
8. TD Product Sheet G702c-GB May 1996Ó (1996).
9. Pagán J, Artajo LS, Garza S, Pagán A and Ibarz A, Actividad enzimática de un preparado para pelado de cítricos (Enzymic activity of a citrus peeling preparation), Abstracts of IV Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingeniería de Alimentos. Valparaíso, Chile p. 59 (2003).
10. Stauffer CE, Viscometric measurements of enzyme activity, in Enzyme Assays for Food Scientist, ed. by Van Nostrand. Reinhold, New York, pp. 277-283 (1989).
11. Pagán J, Degradaci ón enzimática y características físicas y químicas de la pectina del bagazo de melocotón. PhD thesis dissertation. Universitat de Lleida p. 142 (1996).
12. Box GEP, Hunter WG and Hunter JS, Statistic for Experimenters. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2005).
13. Romojaro F, Riquelme F, Pretel MT, Martínez G, Serrano M, Martínez C, et al, Optimización del envasado de naranja pelada en cuarta gama (Packaging optimization of minimally processed peeled orange), in Nuevas Tecnologías de Conservación de Frutas y Hortalizas en Atmósferas Modificadas, ed by Zapata M and Segura P. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, pp. 131-165 (1996).
14. Pagán A, Ibarz A and Pagán J, Kinetics of the digestion products and effect of temperature on the enzymatic peeling process of oranges. J Food Eng 71:361-365 (2005).
15. López P, de la Fuente JL and Burgos J, Continuous determination of endopolygalacturonase activity by means of rotational viscometer. Anal Biochem 220:346-350 (1994).
16. Pagán A, Conde J, Ibarz A and Pagán J, Orange peel degradation and enzyme recovery in the enzymatic peeling process. Int J Food Sci Technol 41:113-120 (2006).
17. Waffenschmidt S and Jaenicke L, Assay of reducing sugars in the nanomole range with 2-2'-bicinchoninate. Anal Biochem 165:337-340 (1987).
18. Mc Ardle RN and Culver CA, Enzyme infusion: A developing technology. Food Technol 11:85-89 (1994).
19. Brady CJ, Fruit ripening. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 38:155-158 (1987).