The long-term benefit of computer-assisted surgical navigation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Konyves, Arpad ^a   Willis Owen, Charles A ^a   Spriggins, Anthony J ^b  

^a SPORTSMED SA   (Australia)

^b SPORTSMED SA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650662626     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749799X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-5-94     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Svärd UCG, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001, 83-B:191-4.
2. Barck AL. 10-year evaluation of compartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989, 4(Suppl):S49-54. 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80007-5, 2584987.
3. Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 1993, 286:154-159.
4. McAlindon TE, S S, Cooper CS, Dieppe PA. "Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: The importance of the patellofemoral joint.". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1992, 51(7):844-849. 10.1136/ard.51.7.844, 1004766, 1632657.
5. Ahlbäck S. "Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation.". Acta Radiol[Diagn](Stockh) 1968, Suppl 277:7-72.
6. Amin AK, Patton JT, Cook RE, Gaston M, Brenkel IJ. Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: results from a matched study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 451:101-6. 10.1097/01.blo.0000224052.01873.20, 16760806.
7. Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991(273):151-6.
8. No listed authors National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 2009, No listed authors., http://www.njrcentre.org.uk
9. No listed authors Australian Orthopaedic Association national Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2009, Adelaide: AOA, No listed authors.
10. Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 2001, 392:272-8. 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00035, 11716395.
11. Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(1):52-7. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.20899, 19092004.
12. Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of the Knee: Postoperative Alignment and its Influence on Overall Results. Clinical Orthopaedics 1987, 221:278-285.
13. Fisher DA, Watts M, Davis KE. Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(Suppl 7):2-8. 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00291-2, 14560403.
14. Jung KA, Kim SJ, Lee SC, Hwang SH, Ahn NK. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Knee 2009, 17(6):387-91. 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.003, 19945880.
15. Rosenberger RE, Fink C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Tecklenburg K, Hoser C. The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16(12):1133-40. 10.1007/s00167-008-0618-7, 18810391.
16. Keene G, Simpson D, Kalairajah Y. Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, (88-B):44-48.
17. Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ. The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(1):29-34. 10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.012, 15660057.
18. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003, 11:40.
19. Seon JK, Song EK, Park SJ, Yoon TR, Lee KB, Jung ST. Comparison of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(3):351-7. 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.025, 18534460.
20. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86(6):818-23. 10.1302/0301-620X.86B6.15456, 15330021.
21. Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee 2009, 16(6):473-8. 10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006, 19464898.
22. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89(4):477-480. 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18094, 17463115.
23. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?. Int Orthop 2009, 33(6):1567-70. 10.1007/s00264-008-0690-0, 2899163, 19034445.
24. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of Postoperative Mechanical Axis Alignment on the Fifteen-Year Survival of Modern, Cemented Total Knee Replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:2143-2149. 10.2106/JBJS.I.01398, 20844155.
25. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Results of an Initial Experience in Thirty-five Patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84:90-98.
26. Willis-Owen CA, Konyves A, Martin DK. Factors affecting the incidence of infection in hip and knee replacement: an analysis of 5277 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92-B:1128-1133.