Intraocular lens formula constant optimization and partial coherence interferometry biometry: Refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 50-62

  Aristodemou, Petros ^a,b   Knox Cartwright, Nathaniel E ^a   Sparrow, John M ^a,c   Johnston, Robert L ^d  

^a BRISTOL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d CHELTENHAM GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CALCULATION; CATARACT EXTRACTION; HUMAN; INTERFEROMETRY; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR;

AGED; AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; BIOMETRY; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; LIGHT; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 78650472001     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.037     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. I.M.E. Landau, and C.-G. Laurell Ultrasound biomicroscopy examination of intraocular lens haptic position after phacoemulsification with continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis and extracapsular cataract extraction with linear capsulotomy Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77 1999 394 396 Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770406.x/pdf Accessed September 4, 2010
2. T. Olsen Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth J Cataract Refract Surg 32 2006 419 424
3. J.T. Holladay, T.C. Prager, T.Y. Chandler, K.H. Musgrove, J.W. Lewis, and R.S. Ruiz A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations J Cataract Refract Surg 14 1988 17 24
4. J.A. Retzlaff, D.R. Sanders, and M.C. Kraff Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula J Cataract Refract Surg 16 1990 333 340 correction, 528
5. K.J. Hoffer The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas J Cataract Refract Surg 19 1993 700 712 errata 1994; 20:677
6. B. Zuberbuhler, and A.J. Morrell Errata in printed Hoffer Q formula [letter] J Cataract Refract Surg 33 2007 2 reply KJ Hoffer, 2-3
7. K. Petermeier, F. Gekeler, A. Messias, M.S. Spitzer, W. Haigis, and P. Szurman Intraocular lens power calculation and optimized constants for highly myopic eyes J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 1575 1581
8. T. Olsen Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85 2007 84 87 Available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118515533/PDFSTART Accessed September 4, 2010
9. J.T. Holladay Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations J Cataract Refract Surg 23 1997 1356 1370 Available at: http://www.docholladay.com/publications/ StandardizingConstants.pdf Accessed September 4, 2010
10. S.N. Madge, C.H. Khong, M. Lamont, A. Bansal, and R.J. Antcliff Optimization of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the Zeiss IOLMaster Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83 2005 436 438 Available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118668639/PDFSTART September 4, 2010
11. R.P. Gale, M. Saldana, R.L. Johnston, B. Zuberbuhler, and M. McKibbin Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery Eye 23 2009 149 152
12. J. Jabbour, L. Irwig, P. Macaskill, and M.P. Hennessy Intraocular lens power in bilateral cataract surgery: whether adjusting for error of predicted refraction in the first eye improves prediction in the second eye J Cataract Refract Surg 32 2006 2091 2097
13. P. Aristodemou, N.E. Knox Cartwright, J.M. Sparrow, and R.L. Johnston Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry J Cataract Refract Surg 37 2011 63 71
14. S.P.B. Percival, A.V. Vyas, S.S. Setty, and S. Manvikar The influence of implant design on accuracy of postoperative refraction Eye 16 2002 309 315 Available at: http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v16/n3/pdf/6700043a.pdf Accessed September 4, 2010
15. W. Haigis, B. Lege, N. Miller, and B. Schneider Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238 2000 765 773
16. O. Findl, W. Drexler, R. Menapace, H. Heinzl, C.K. Hitzenberger, and A.F. Fercher Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry J Cataract Refract Surg 27 2001 861 867
17. S. Norrby Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 368 376
18. S. Raymond, I. Favilla, and L. Santamaria Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculations: a randomized study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50 2009 2547 2552 Available at: http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/50/6/2547 Accessed September 4, 2010
19. H.J. Shammas A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurements Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J 10 1984 444 447
20. O. Findl, K. Kriechbaum, S. Sacu, B. Kiss, K. Polak, J. Nepp, G. Schild, G. Rainer, S. Maca, V. Petternel, B. Lackner, and W. Drexler Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 29 2003 1950 1955
21. M. Shirayama, L. Wang, M.P. Weikert, and D.D. Koch Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices Am J Ophthalmol 148 2009 528 535
22. P. Sunderraj Clinical comparison of automated and manual keratometry in pre-operative ocular biometry Eye 6 1992 60 62
23. H.J. Shammas, K.J. Hoffer, and M.C. Shammas Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 330 334
24. S.N. Fedorov, A.I. Kolinko, and A.I. Kolinko Estimation of optical power of the intraocular lens Vestn Oftalmol 80 4 1967 27 31
25. C. Prior, R.J. Ramsay, J. O'Day, and R. Stephens IOL prediction: an evaluation of preoperatively determined intraocular lens power accuracy Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 16 1988 111 117
26. N.E. Knox Cartwright, R.L. Johnston, P.D. Jaycock, D.M. Tole, and J.M. Sparrow The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: when should IOLMaster biometric measurements be rechecked? Eye 24 2010 894 900
27. Carl Zeiss Meditec AG. IOLMaster with Advanced Technology Software Version 5.4. User Manual, 2008. Available at: http://doctor-hill.com/zeiss- iolmaster/iolmaster-5-4.pdf. Accessed September 4, 2010
28. Medisoft Ophthalmology. Patient notes, audit and administration. Medisoft Ltd., Leeds, United Kingdom. Available at: www.medisoft.co.uk. Accessed September 4, 2010
29. Freemat download. Available at: http://www.freemat.sf.net. Accessed September 4, 2010
30. Lenth R V. (2006-2009). Java Applets for Power and Sample Size (computer software). Available at: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/∼rlenth/Power. Accessed September 4, 2010
31. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Summary of safety and effectiveness. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf6/P060022b.pdf. Accessed September 4, 2010
32. User Group for Laser Interference Biometry. Optimized A constants for the Zeiss IOLMaster. Available at: http://www.augenklinik.uni-wuerzburg.de/ulib/c1. htm. Accessed September 4, 2010