Comparison of Corneal Powers Obtained from 4 Different Devices

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 148, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Shirayama, Mariko ^a   Wang, Li ^a   Weikert, Mitchell P ^a   Koch, Douglas D ^a  

^a CULLEN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; LENS POWER; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 70349265986     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.028     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Koch D.D., Wakil J.S., Samuelson S.W., and Haft E.A. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I. J Cataract Refract Surg 18 (1992) 342-347
2. Tennen D.G., Keates R.H., and Montoya C. Comparison of three keratometry instruments. J Cataract Refract Surg 21 (1995) 407-408
3. Cuaycong M.J., Gay C.A., Emery J., Haft E.A., and Koch D.D. Comparison of the accuracy of computerized videokeratography and keratometry for use in intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 19 (1993) 178-181
4. Manning C.A., and Kloess P.M. Comparison of portable automated keratometry and manual keratometry for IOL calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 23 (1997) 1213-1216
5. Vogel A., Dick H.B., and Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 1961-1968
6. Elbaz U., Barkana Y., Gerber Y., Avni I., and Zadok D. Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 143 (2007) 48-53
7. Santodomingo-Rubido J., Mallen E.A., Gilmartin B., and Wolffsohn J.S. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol 86 (2002) 458-462
8. Rosa N., Capasso L., Lanza M., Furgiuele D., and Romano A. Reliability of the IOLMaster in measuring corneal power changes after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 409-413
9. Nemeth J., Fekete O., and Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 85-88
10. Huynh S.C., Mai T.Q., Kifley A., Wang J.J., Rose K.A., and Mitchell P. An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children. Cornea 25 (2006) 383-387
11. Davies L.N., Mallen E.A., Wolffsohn J.S., and Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon Nvision-K5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 80 (2003) 320-324
12. Gantenbein C., Lang H.M., Ruprecht K.W., and Georg T. First steps with the Zeiss IOLMaster: a comparison between acoustic contact biometry and non-contact optical biometry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 220 (2003) 309-314
13. Heatley C.J., Whitefield L.A., and Hugkulstone C.E. Effect of pupil dilation on the accuracy of the IOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1993-1996
14. Zadnik K., Mutti D.O., and Adams A.J. The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 (1992) 2325-2333
15. Shankar H., Taranath D., Santhirathelagan C.T., and Pesudovs K. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 103-113
16. Holladay J.T., Moran J.R., and Kezirian G.M. Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 61-79
17. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
18. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 368-376
19. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 18 (1992) 125-129
20. Menassa N., Kaufmann C., Goggin M., Job O.M., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 1742-1747
21. Cho P., Lam A.K., Mountford J., and Ng L. The performance of four different corneal topographers on normal human corneas and its impact on orthokeratology lens fitting. Optom Vis Sci 79 (2002) 175-183
22. Kawamorita T., Uozato H., Kamiya K., et al. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg 35 (2009) 127-133
23. Hoffer K.J. Biometry of 7,500 cataractous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 90 (1980) 360-368
24. Ninn-Pedersen K., Stenevi U., and Ehinger B. Cataract patients in a defined Swedish population 1986-1990. II. Preoperative observations. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 72 (1994) 10-15
25. Buzard K., Shearing S., and Relyea R. Incidence of astigmatism in a cataract practice. J Refract Surg 4 (1988) 173-178