Integrated optical coherence tomography and microscopy for ex vivo multiscale evaluation of human breast tissues

Cancer Research

Volumn 70, Issue 24, 2010, Pages 10070-10079

  Zhou, Chao ^a   Cohen, David W ^b   Wang, Yihong ^b,c   Lee, Hsiang Chieh ^a   Mondelblatt, Amy E ^b   Tsai, Tsung Han ^a   Aguirre, Aaron D ^a,d   Fujimoto, James G ^a   Connolly, James L ^b  

^a USA   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CYST; BREAST DUCT; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MICROSCOPY; OPTICAL COHERENCE MICROSCOPY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STROMA; ADULT; AGED; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CYTOLOGY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MICROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650409348     PISSN: 00085472     EISSN: 15387445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2968     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures; 2010.
2. Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:504-20.
3. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy - a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-64.
4. Crowe JP, Rim A, Patrick RJ, et al. Does core needle breast biopsy accurately reflect breast pathology? Surgery 2003;134:523-6.
5. Dillon MF, Hill ADK, Quinn CM, O'Doherty A, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N. The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of falsenegative cases. Ann Surg 2005;242:701-7.
6. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast - an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 2003;97:1824-31.
7. Agarwal T, Patel B, Rajan P, Cunningham DA, Darzi A, Hadjiminas DJ. Core biopsy versus FNAC for palpable breast cancers. Is image guidance necessary? Eur J Cancer 2003;39:52-6.
8. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.
9. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated largecore breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-11.
10. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208:717-23.
11. Connolly JL, Boyages J, Nixon AJ, et al. Predictors of breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer. Modern Pathol 1998;11:134-9.
12. Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ, et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 1996;78:1921-8.
13. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1668-75.
14. Fleming FJ, Hill ADK, Mc Dermott EW, O'Doherty A, O'Higgins NJ, Quinn CM. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:233-7.
15. Swanson GP, Rynearson K, Symmonds R. Significance of margins of excision on breast cancer recurrence. Am J Clin Oncol-Cancer 2002;25:438-41.
16. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinelnodein breast cancer - a multicenter validation study. New Engl J Med 1998;339:941-6.
17. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:599-609.
18. Schrenk P, Rieger R, Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:608-14.
19. Olson TP, Harter J, Munoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin TM. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2953-60.
20. McLaughlin SA, Ochoa-Frongia LM, Patil SM, Cody HS, Sclafani LM. Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:76-82.
21. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178-81.
22. Boppart SA, Luo W, Marks DL, Singletary KW. Optical coherence tomography: feasibility for basic research and image-guided surgery of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;84:85-97.
23. Hsiung PL, Phatak DR, Chen Y, Aguirre AD, Fujimoto JG, Connolly JL. Benign and malignant lesion in the human breast depicted with ultrahigh resolution and dimensional optical coherence tomography. Radiology 2007;244:865-74.
24. McLaughlin RA, Scolaro L, Robbins P, Hamza S, Saunders C, Sampson DD. Imaging of human lymph nodes using optical coherence tomography: potential for staging cancer. Cancer Res 2010;70:2579-84.
25. Nguyen FT, Zysk AM, Chaney EJ, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography. Cancer Res 2009;69:8790-6.
26. Izatt JA, Hee MR, Owen GM, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence microscopy in scattering media. Opt Lett 1994;19:590-2.
27. Aguirre AD, Hsiung P, Ko TH, Hartl I, Fujimoto JG. High-resolution optical coherence microscopy for high-speed, in vivo cellular imaging. Opt Lett 2003;28:2064-6.
28. Huang SW, Aguirre AD, Huber RA, Adler DC, Fujimoto JG. Swept source optical coherence microscopy using a Fourier domain mode-locked laser. Opt Express 2007;15:6210-7.
29. Izatt JA, Kulkarni MD, Wang H-W, Kobayashi K, Sivak MV Jr.Optical coherence tomography and microscopy in gastrointestinal tissues. IEEE J Sel Top Quant 1996;2:1017-28.
30. Aguirre AD, Chen Y, Bryan B, et al. Cellular resolution ex vivo imaging of gastrointestinal tissues with optical coherence microscopy. J Biomed Opt 2010;15:016025;1-9.
31. Zhou C, Wang Y, Aguirre AD, et al. Ex vivo imaging of human thyroid pathology using integrated optical coherence tomography and optical coherence microscopy. J Biomed Opt 2010;15:016001;1-9.
32. Aguirre AD. Advances in Optical Coherence Tomography and Microscopy for Endoscopic Applications and Functional Neuroimaging. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2008.
33. Hee MR, Huang D, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Polarization-sensitive low-coherence reflectometer for birefringence characterization and ranging. J Opt Soc Am B 1992;9:903-8.
34. deBoer JF, Milner TE, vanGemert MJC, Nelson JS. Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 1997;22:934-6.
35. Everett MJ, Schoenenberger K, Colston BW, Da Silva LB. Birefringence characterization of biological tissue by use of optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 1998;23:228-30.
36. Strasswimmer J, Pierce MC, Park BH, Neel V, de Boer JF. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography of invasive basal cell carcinoma. J Biom Opt 2004;9:292-8.
37. Loo C, Lin A, Hirsch L, et al. Nanoshell-enabled photonics-based imaging and therapy of cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004;3:33-40.
38. Adler DC, Huang SW, Huber R, Fujimoto JG. Photothermal detection of gold nanoparticles using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2008;16:4376-93.
39. Skala MC, Crow MJ, Wax A, Izatt JA. Photothermal optical coherence tomography of epidermal growth factor receptor in live cells using immunotargeted gold nanospheres. Nano Lett 2008;8:3461-7.
40. Zhou C, Tsai TH, Adler DC, et al. Photothermal optical coherence tomography in ex vivo human breast tissues using gold nanoshells. Opt Lett 2010;35:700-2.
41. Li X, Chudoba C, Ko T, Pitris C, Fujimoto JG. Imaging needle for optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2000;25:1520-2.
42. Zysk AM, Marks DL, Liu DY, Boppart SA. Needle-based reflection refractometry of scattering samples using coherence-gated detection. Opt Express 2007;15:4787-94.
43. Iftimia NV, Mujat M, Ustun T, Ferguson RD, Danthu V, Hammer DX. Spectral-domain low coherence interferometry/optical coherence tomography system for fine needle breast biopsy guidance. Rev Sci Instrum 2009;80:024302.
44. Rueckel M, Mack-Bucher JA, Denk W. Adaptive wavefront correction in two-photon microscopy using coherence-gated wavefront sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:17137-42.
45. Debarre D, Botcherby EJ, Watanabe T, Srinivas S, Booth MJ, Wilson T. Image-based adaptive optics for two-photon microscopy. Opt Lett 2009;34:2495-7.
46. Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK, Kamp G, Elzaiat SY. Measurement of intraocular distances by backscattering spectral interferometry. Opt Commun 1995;117:43-8.
47. Choma MA, Sarunic MV, Yang CH, Izatt JA. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003;11:2183-9.
48. de Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, Pierce MC, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2003;28:2067-9.
49. Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003;11:889-94.
50. Wieser W, Biedermann B, Klein T, Eigenwillig C, Huber R. Multi-Megahertz OCT: high quality 3D imaging at 20 million A-scans and 4.5 GVoxels per second. Opt Express 2010;18:14685-704.