Global and local central non-upwind finite volume schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws in porous media

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 64, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 793-811

  Edwards, Michael G ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Central; Finite volume; Higher order Godunov; Hyperbolic; Lax Friedrichs; LLF; Monotonicity; MUSCL; Non upwind; Rusanov; Upwind

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL; FINITE VOLUME; HIGHER ORDER; HYPERBOLIC; LAX-FRIEDRICHS; LLF; MONOTONICITY; MUSCL; NON-UPWIND; RUSANOV; UPWIND;

POROUS MATERIALS;

EID: 78650388434     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2178     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aziz K, Settari A. Petroleum Reservoir Simulation. Applied Science Publishers: London, 1979.
2. Bell JB, Colella P, Trangenstein JA. Higher order Godunov methods for general systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 82:362-397.
3. Blunt MJ, Rubin B. Implicit flux-limiting schemes for petroleum reservoir simulation. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 102:194-210.
4. Edwards MG, Christie MA. Dynamically adaptive Godunov schemes with renormalization for reservoir simulation. SPE 25268, Proceedings of the Twelfth SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A., 28 February-3 March 1993; 413-422.
5. Durlofsky LJ. A triangle based mixed finite element finite volume technique for modeling two phase flow through porous media. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 105:252-266.
6. Edwards MG. A higher order Godunov scheme coupled with dynamic local grid refinement for flow in a porous medium. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 131:287-308.
7. Edwards MG. Cross-flow, tensors and finite volume approximation with deferred correction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 151:143-161.
8. Thiele M, Edwards MG. Physically based higher order Godunov schemes for compositional simulation. Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Paper 66403, Houston, TX, U.S.A., 11-14 February 2001.
9. Edwards MG. Non-upwind monotonicity based finite volume schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws in porous media. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Cannes, France, 30 August-2 September 2004.
10. Edwards MG. Non-upwind versus upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws in porous media. Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Paper: 93691, Houston, TX, U.S.A., February 2005.
11. Edwards MG. Higher-resolution hyperbolic-coupled-elliptic flux-continuous CVD schemes on structured and unstructured grids in 2-D. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2006; 51:1059-1077.
12. Lamine S, Edwards MG. Higher resolution convection schemes for flow in porous media on highly distorted unstructured grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2008; 76:1139-1158.
13. Edwards MG. Higher-resolution hyperbolic-coupled-elliptic flux-continuous CVD schemes on structured and unstructured grids in 3-D. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2006; 51:1079-1095.
14. Godlewski E, Raviart P. Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 118. Springer: New York, 1996.
15. Harten A, Hyman JM. Self adjusting grid methods for one dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1983; 50:235-269.
16. Rusanov VV. Calculation of interaction of non-steady shock waves with obstacles. Zhur Vychislitel noi Mathematicheskoi Fiziki 1961; 1:267-279.
17. Liu XD, Osher S. Convex ENO high order multi-dimensional schemes without field by field decomposition or staggered grids. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 141:1-27.
18. Edwards MG. The dominant wave-capturing flux: a finite-volume scheme without decomposition for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 218:275-294.
19. Kurganov A, Tadmor E. New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 160(1):241-282.
20. Kurganov A, Noelle S, Petrova G. Semi-discrete central schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2001; 23(3):707-740.
21. Liu XD, Lax P. Positive schemes for solving muti-dimensional hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 187:428-440.
22. Bear J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier: New York, 1972.
23. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 43:357-372.
24. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A sequel to Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics 1979; 32:101-136.
25. Shu CW, Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1988; 77:439-471.